28.1 MPG highway / 25.2 MPG mixed
My gas mileage has been consistently very high compared to the specs especially the last 10000 miles even on mixed city and highway driving. Here in the San Francisco area it's not perfectly flat either and my highway driving I typically drive around 75 MPH.
Averaging 540+ miles per tank till refill of 22+ gallons. Sometimes I just fill because I don't trust the fuel gauge.
On my 2000 S500 I would typically get 490+ on the same 22+ gallons which significantly less.
Does anybody else get the same? Curious because it's not like I really have to try hard to get this mileage.
T
I've had the S550 4matic for 1500 miles and getting and average of 16.7 mpg at an average speed of 35. Even on the highway I haven't done much better than 23 mpg.
Trending Topics


to wit: (a very boring) 60mph for 500 miles trip with windows/roof shut and the air conditioning on last week. chicago to pittsburgh via the turnpike system. 31 mpg!
on the return trip (pittsburgh to chicago), i did 72mph for the same 500 miles (obviously) with the windows down and the air conditioning off, and i got 28 mpg and a sunburned left arm!
this little unscientific study makes me love the s-class even more. and makes me smile when i see adverts on the tele for saturns and toyotas boasting about their 30 mpg highway driving. i blew those claims out of the water driving an arguably MUCH better luxurious auto.
thought you all might like to read about my little trip and the results. i know we don't buy these cars to save on petrol and by owning one none of us care about the $100 fill-up, but i wanted to test what it could do given i had the time and all. and to shove it back in the faces of those that tell us that we drive gas guzzlers. not necessarily the case, 'eh?
prius my ***!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I get some ?6MPG in my daily <5mi urban commute....and some ?11MPG on my wkend pleasure drives on fast fwys/mtn twisties (but I accelerate and decelerate through various speed ranges for sheer sport and aural enjoyment
)....Expect to get an additional 1-2MPG when I "economize" by getting an '09 CL65 in Fall.....presumably, bigger motors don't need to work as hard as a humble 63 when pressed for perf....

Per my value judgment, any MPG data need to be risk-adjusted by healthcare costs/disabilities/oppty costs of lost wages, etc likely when alleged econoboxes are involved in a collision, vs same scenario w/a new S/CL.....

The current S class does not use that technology as far as I know. (If you are referring to that system that would shut off half of the cylinders when not under a heavy load). The last I heard of that was in the W140 models. Can anyone verify what I'm saying or correct me on this. I've never owned a 12 cylinder until now so that tech knowledge is over my head.
I also don't think the latest engines use it.
to wit: (a very boring) 60mph for 500 miles trip with windows/roof shut and the air conditioning on last week. chicago to pittsburgh via the turnpike system. 31 mpg!
on the return trip (pittsburgh to chicago), i did 72mph for the same 500 miles (obviously) with the windows down and the air conditioning off, and i got 28 mpg and a sunburned left arm!
this little unscientific study makes me love the s-class even more. and makes me smile when i see adverts on the tele for saturns and toyotas boasting about their 30 mpg highway driving. i blew those claims out of the water driving an arguably MUCH better luxurious auto.
thought you all might like to read about my little trip and the results. i know we don't buy these cars to save on petrol and by owning one none of us care about the $100 fill-up, but i wanted to test what it could do given i had the time and all. and to shove it back in the faces of those that tell us that we drive gas guzzlers. not necessarily the case, 'eh?
prius my ***!
Last edited by Mercedes22; Jul 28, 2008 at 09:52 AM.


12,939 miles
429.11 operating hours
30mph (average, i guess)
bang on 20.0mpg
therefore, if you trust the computers, i have a lifetime average of 20mpg for this 400hp beast; i'm not sure if that is good or bad?
admittedly, i have something of a light foot and usually (but not always) drive in 'c' (comfort) mode. i think the 7 gears makes the difference, though. to wit: when i was driving to chicago to pittsburgh per my original post above, the rpms were indicating 1,500; the engine just isn't working that hard at 60mph.
this is just my historical experience. carry on ,,,









