Customized Special Order 2015 S550 - The wait begins
First of all, I sincerely apologize for the "get a life" thing I said. It's not for me to follow something like this nearly as closely as many of you did, but I was out of line to make light of it. If so many of you folks find this so utterly interesting, informative and entertaining, who am I to judge?
As far as the car goes, it certainly is lovely. I wouldn't have ordered it that way, but most folks here probably wouldn't have either. I congratulate LM and hope he enjoys his new ride.
As for my new car, the "customization" I would have loved, is not something MB is willing to do: I would have loved a new S550 without the Panorama Roof, without run flat tires and with a jack & spare hidden in the trunk. All that said, I do not think I would have paid what LM paid for his custom order to get those things. I will deal with these three issues the best I can and live with them.
So, I still don't like black cars. I still don't like interiors that are half black and half another color. I still think that the cost to build this thing was way off the charts and a waste of money, but that's JUST ME and I do apologize to anyone I may have offended with my previous remarks.
May we all enjoy whatever it is we are driving, as much as LM is enjoying his wonderful new car.
Merry Christmas to all,
Streamliner








I think you are working with my dealer. I just got this from them a little while ago suggesting the same thing...-
Last edited by LovinMercedes; Dec 4, 2014 at 03:15 PM.




The total list price was $2,680 for parts and labor. The grill itself is a little over $2,000 list price.
I did not get a credit for the 550 grill.
Last edited by LovinMercedes; Dec 3, 2014 at 09:25 PM.
The total list price was $2,680 for parts and labor. The grill itself is a little over $2,000 list price.
I did not get a credit for the 550 grill.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG












Remember, here in Northern California, the roads are not as bad as the Northeast. The roads and highways I went on today were relatively smooth.
Frankly, I was very surprised at the ride, in a good way. I can't imagine that on the flat smooth roads, the car could feel that much better with the conventional tires. Even the ridges in the roads and the areas where the roads were not as smooth, felt better than I had thought. I would imagine the place where one might get the most improvement with conventional tires, is going over bumps or rough roads.
I have scheduled a drive in an AMG S63 with 20" conventional tires. I will make my decision after that but frankly, I was surprised at the level of the ride comfort with the run flats.
When I had my Individual 7 series in 2010, it had run flats and I really did not like those. I had lots of bubbles in the sidewalls. I am told the new Mercedes Benz MOE tires do not have that problem. What are the experiences of others with respect to bubbles in the side walls.
Frankly, I thought this was going to be a no-brainer, but now I am not sure. Hopefully a drive in the S63 will make the decision a little more clear.
Remember, here in Northern California, the roads are not as bad as the Northeast. The roads and highways I went on today were relatively smooth.
Frankly, I was very surprised at the ride, in a good way. I can't imagine that on the flat smooth roads, the car could feel that much better with the conventional tires. Even the ridges in the roads and the areas where the roads were not as smooth, felt better than I had thought. I would imagine the place where one might get the most improvement with conventional tires, is going over bumps or rough roads.
I have scheduled a drive in an AMG S63 with 20" conventional tires. I will make my decision after that but frankly, I was surprised at the level of the ride comfort with the run flats.
When I had my Individual 7 series in 2010, it had run flats and I really did not like those. I had lots of bubbles in the sidewalls. I am told the new Mercedes Benz MOE tires do not have that problem. What are the experiences of others with respect to bubbles in the side walls.
Frankly, I thought this was going to be a no-brainer, but now I am not sure. Hopefully a drive in the S63 will make the decision a little more clear.
RE: tire bubbles - I know its regional roads contributing to this - but I have changed.... 8 tires.... 8! (RF) before switching to conventional - in which I have switched 2 due to flats - which occurred on the most horrific pot holes you could imagine. Those incidents would have put MULTIPLE bubbles in the run flats and they'd have had to be switched out.
Let us know how you feel when you test out the S63 with the conventional tires.
Overall - the build quality and feel of this car trumps the 221 though. No doubt.




Last edited by LovinMercedes; Dec 5, 2014 at 10:43 PM.
Remember, here in Northern California, the roads are not as bad as the Northeast. The roads and highways I went on today were relatively smooth.
Frankly, I was very surprised at the ride, in a good way. I can't imagine that on the flat smooth roads, the car could feel that much better with the conventional tires. Even the ridges in the roads and the areas where the roads were not as smooth, felt better than I had thought. I would imagine the place where one might get the most improvement with conventional tires, is going over bumps or rough roads.
I have scheduled a drive in an AMG S63 with 20" conventional tires. I will make my decision after that but frankly, I was surprised at the level of the ride comfort with the run flats.
When I had my Individual 7 series in 2010, it had run flats and I really did not like those. I had lots of bubbles in the sidewalls. I am told the new Mercedes Benz MOE tires do not have that problem. What are the experiences of others with respect to bubbles in the side walls.
Frankly, I thought this was going to be a no-brainer, but now I am not sure. Hopefully a drive in the S63 will make the decision a little more clear.
Drive precision/stability/braking on bumpy CA rds (worst stretch I often deal w/is Bway in SF btwn Columbus&Tunnel) really depends upon interaction of tires/forged wheels/CCB/MBC, etc.....not sure an S63 w/std (?nonforged) wheels&steel brakes and Airmatic/4Matic is a useful comparo
Been driving new 65s w/factory-spec perf tires/forged wheels/ABC (and in past 2yrs CCB) on these worst CA rds for past 8+yrs and find this talk of routine tire failure/bubbles, etc etc truly foreign
Have ridden in many S550 Airmatic cabs w/18 or 19" wheels and likely non-perf tires through such bumpy (or even pothole-ridden in case of NYC) rds in SF or NYC and suspect properly spec'd new AMGs are both more confidence-inspiring (esp in braking/handling under duress) and comfortable, despite perhaps counterintuitive larger wheels/tires, firmer chassis, etc etc




Drive precision/stability/braking on bumpy CA rds (worst stretch I often deal w/is Bway in SF btwn Columbus&Tunnel) really depends upon interaction of tires/forged wheels/CCB/MBC, etc.....not sure an S63 w/std (?nonforged) wheels&steel brakes and Airmatic/4Matic is a useful comparo
Been driving new 65s w/factory-spec perf tires/forged wheels/ABC (and in past 2yrs CCB) on these worst CA rds for past 8+yrs and find this talk of routine tire failure/bubbles, etc etc truly foreign
Have ridden in many S550 Airmatic cabs w/18 or 19" wheels and likely non-perf tires through such bumpy (or even pothole-ridden in case of NYC) rds in SF or NYC and suspect properly spec'd new AMGs are both more confidence-inspiring (esp in braking/handling under duress) and comfortable, despite perhaps counterintuitive larger wheels/tires, firmer chassis, etc etc
With respect to the S550 and S63, I believe they are both alloy wheels but you do have the difference in the S550 with MBC vs. the S63 with Airmatic/4Matic.
The S65 might be a more useful comparison because both have MBC but then again, the S65 have the forged wheels.
Clearly, the 18's and 19's will be more comfortable so one must compare against 20's.
Given these variables, my questions would be:
1. Wouldn't the MBC be more comfortable than the Airmatic/4Matic, so that if the S63 was more comfortable with those features and a similar alloy wheel, could you draw the conclusion that it is because of the conventional tires vs. the run flats.
2. If you used a S65 as a comparison where both are MBC cars, and the S65 were come comfortable, could you assume it was the conventional tires, or does the fact that the S65 has a forged wheel and the S550 is not, play a role in the comfort of the ride.
3. Are there too many variables between the S550, S63 and S65 that any comparison of the drive comfort on 20 wheels, conventional vs. run flat, is just a fruitless exercise, which I think might be the point you are originally making.
Surely, you can draw some conclusion from the different model rides on 20 inch, conventional vs. run flat, or maybe not?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.




The advice I'd give - since you are going to keep the till the next model year ( i assume ) - approach your dealer - You've given them a lot of business.
There is an approved tire - the dunlop gt max sport conventional tire. Mercedes is approving this - and will pay for this. Ask them to order it for you. Have them put it on your car NOW - and then tell them if you like it - they can keep the runflats and put it in their stock since they are basically new. If you drive with conventional and you see no difference - you will give THOSE back to the dealer to put into stock since we all know they'll need it.
No one loses.....and you get to see first hand - on your own car - how it rides with - and how it rides without conventional.




The tires are $400 or so a pop (probably 300 for the dealer if that!)
For $1200 - they can do you a favor on a $160,000 car to insure smoothness.
Naturally all this can be said very nicely haha.
See what they say - or compromise to do a 50/50 cost split. You spoke so highly of them - I'm sure they aren't going to go to the mattress on this.
It;s the very essence of the S Class....a comfortable right.






