2007/2008 S 65
11-01-2005, 07:14 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Potomac, Md
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 E320 CDI, 2007 ML 320 CDI, 2008 C63, 2008 G55
2007/2008 S 65
I was in Affalterbach last week and took this picture of a pre-production 2007/2008 S 65 AMG. Apparently the S class will not get the new 6.3 liter engine. The 5.5 kompressor will remain as the AMG V8 and the 6.5 twin turbo will remain the AMG V12. Apparently AMG feels that the higher torque 5.5 K is a better engine for the heavier AMG vehicles like the E, S, CL and SL models. This car has the 6.5 liter twin turbo but does not have any AMG body work. The production vehicle will have the AMG body work but this particular vehicle is dressed down.
11-02-2005, 03:50 AM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
So they'll keep the 55 also? I didn't expect that. Apparently they want an S-AMG affordable for the commoners as well :-)
BTW, do you have more pictures? And do you mind if they get publilshed on a website?
BTW, do you have more pictures? And do you mind if they get publilshed on a website?
Last edited by sprins; 11-02-2005 at 03:57 AM.
11-02-2005, 01:04 PM
#5
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the exception of a version that is not naturally aspirated, it would be a step backwards for MB to use that motor. The S65 motor has an output of 604hp and 738ft lbs, whereas the new 6.3l has an output 510hp and 465 ft lbs. Am I missing something here?
11-02-2005, 01:40 PM
#6
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBs
Originally Posted by natec
With the exception of a version that is not naturally aspirated, it would be a step backwards for MB to use that motor. The S65 motor has an output of 604hp and 738ft lbs, whereas the new 6.3l has an output 510hp and 465 ft lbs. Am I missing something here?
And the three valve 5.5 liter AMG M113 V8 Kompressor has 493 hp and 516 lb-ft. My guess now is that they will keep using it in the S 63 AMG - maybe in an updated version.
11-02-2005, 02:29 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Wolfgang
And the three valve 5.5 liter AMG M113 V8 Kompressor has 493 hp and 516 lb-ft. My guess now is that they will keep using it in the S 63 AMG - maybe in an updated version.
Trending Topics
11-02-2005, 02:47 PM
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBs
Originally Posted by sprins
So you think the naming will indeed be S63 despite the 55 engine?
It's also difficult to predict what the sales organizations in the different countries decide as happened recently with the S500 vs S550...
11-02-2005, 02:48 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS 55 AMG
Originally Posted by sprins
So you think the naming will indeed be S63 despite the 55 engine?
11-02-2005, 02:59 PM
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Bipasha493
That wouldnt make too much sence.....5.5 litre and still call it a S63?
Say, is that you in the avatar?
11-02-2005, 03:20 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Potomac, Md
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 E320 CDI, 2007 ML 320 CDI, 2008 C63, 2008 G55
Here is the way I understand the new S-class engine choices:
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
S55 - AMG 5.5 liter Kompressor. (Same engine as current AMG S55).
S65 - AMG 6.5 liter bi-turbo. (Same engine as current AMG S65).
*6.3 liter could be used in the future, perhaps even a 6.3 liter kompressor producing over 600 HP.
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
S55 - AMG 5.5 liter Kompressor. (Same engine as current AMG S55).
S65 - AMG 6.5 liter bi-turbo. (Same engine as current AMG S65).
*6.3 liter could be used in the future, perhaps even a 6.3 liter kompressor producing over 600 HP.
11-02-2005, 04:10 PM
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by rake55
Here is the way I understand the new S-class engine choices:
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
11-02-2005, 04:44 PM
#13
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBs
Originally Posted by rake55
Here is the way I understand the new S-class engine choices:
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
S55 - AMG 5.5 liter Kompressor. (Same engine as current AMG S55).
S65 - AMG 6.5 liter bi-turbo. (Same engine as current AMG S65).
*6.3 liter could be used in the future, perhaps even a 6.3 liter kompressor producing over 600 HP.
S500 - normally aspirated 5.5 liter engine producing 380+ HP (This is not an AMG engine but the new Mercedes Benz 4 valve V8).
S55 - AMG 5.5 liter Kompressor. (Same engine as current AMG S55).
S65 - AMG 6.5 liter bi-turbo. (Same engine as current AMG S65).
*6.3 liter could be used in the future, perhaps even a 6.3 liter kompressor producing over 600 HP.
See this post:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....6&postcount=34
11-03-2005, 02:14 PM
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Potomac, Md
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 E320 CDI, 2007 ML 320 CDI, 2008 C63, 2008 G55
S65 AMG:
Where are you getting this information? It is direct contrast to what I was told while at AMG last week. You could be right but I was specifically told that the new 6.3 will not go into the S class as of yet. The AMG V8 will be the 5.5 Kompressor engine (Perhaps a 4 valve version) and the AMG V12 will be the current 6.5 twin turbo.
Where are you getting this information? It is direct contrast to what I was told while at AMG last week. You could be right but I was specifically told that the new 6.3 will not go into the S class as of yet. The AMG V8 will be the 5.5 Kompressor engine (Perhaps a 4 valve version) and the AMG V12 will be the current 6.5 twin turbo.
11-03-2005, 07:49 PM
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
04E55AMG, 05Dodge RAM 1500 Quad Cab, 02Montero Limited
Originally Posted by rake55
S65 AMG:
Where are you getting this information? It is direct contrast to what I was told while at AMG last week. You could be right but I was specifically told that the new 6.3 will not go into the S class as of yet. The AMG V8 will be the 5.5 Kompressor engine (Perhaps a 4 valve version) and the AMG V12 will be the current 6.5 twin turbo.
Where are you getting this information? It is direct contrast to what I was told while at AMG last week. You could be right but I was specifically told that the new 6.3 will not go into the S class as of yet. The AMG V8 will be the 5.5 Kompressor engine (Perhaps a 4 valve version) and the AMG V12 will be the current 6.5 twin turbo.
Rob Allen head of AMG in the US told us a few weeks ago @ MBUSA that the 6.3 engine will be in the S and the E by next summer. I would say he is a good person to listen to.
11-04-2005, 12:02 AM
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04E55 AMG
Rob Allen head of AMG in the US told us a few weeks ago @ MBUSA that the 6.3 engine will be in the S and the E by next summer. I would say he is a good person to listen to.
11-04-2005, 12:24 AM
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
04E55AMG, 05Dodge RAM 1500 Quad Cab, 02Montero Limited
Originally Posted by natec
Did Rob Allen say that the 6.3 engine in its current form would be placed in the S65/S63 by next summer? Or is there a possibility that a version of the 6.3 would be used that was not naturally aspirated (i.e. biturbo, supercharger). As it stands, I cannot understand why MB would go to the 6.3 from the 6.0 biturbo V12, and incur a subsequent loss of 94 horsepower and 273 ft lbs.
Based on Rob:
The S63 will replace the S55 since they are doing away with SC and going NA which will be a lighter engine with the 7G trans.
The S65 will not change and still be the leader in the line-up.
11-04-2005, 01:53 AM
#22
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04E55 AMG
Based on Rob:
The S63 will replace the S55 since they are doing away with SC and going NA which will be a lighter engine with the 7G trans.
The S65 will not change and still be the leader in the line-up.
The S63 will replace the S55 since they are doing away with SC and going NA which will be a lighter engine with the 7G trans.
The S65 will not change and still be the leader in the line-up.
11-04-2005, 03:01 AM
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBs
Originally Posted by 04E55 AMG
Rob Allen head of AMG in the US told us a few weeks ago @ MBUSA that the 6.3 engine will be in the S and the E by next summer. I would say he is a good person to listen to.
And the new M156 in the ML 63 AMG will not be used in the S 63 AMG.
Last edited by Wolfgang; 11-04-2005 at 03:19 AM.
11-04-2005, 03:43 AM
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
With all due respect, perhaps Rob Allen is not that a reliable source. He alledgedly also anounced the SLR nose on the SL recently: https://mbworld.org/forums/sl55-amg-sl63-amg-sl65-amg-r230/123590-breaking-news-new-sl-slr-nose-coming.html
Be aware that disputing Rob Allans alledged statements may cause agressive replies.
I've heard this "6,2l engine won't be in the new S-AMG" from 3 or 4 different places in the last week now.
Be aware that disputing Rob Allans alledged statements may cause agressive replies.
I've heard this "6,2l engine won't be in the new S-AMG" from 3 or 4 different places in the last week now.
Last edited by sprins; 11-04-2005 at 03:58 AM.
11-04-2005, 11:17 AM
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sprins
With all due respect, perhaps Rob Allen is not that a reliable source. He alledgedly also anounced the SLR nose on the SL recently: https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=123590
Be aware that disputing Rob Allans alledged statements may cause agressive replies.
I've heard this "6,2l engine won't be in the new S-AMG" from 3 or 4 different places in the last week now.
Be aware that disputing Rob Allans alledged statements may cause agressive replies.
I've heard this "6,2l engine won't be in the new S-AMG" from 3 or 4 different places in the last week now.
