Disappointing News



http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Sep06/1...otor_Show.html
The E55 crowd is fairly mutinous at this point because of the major torque reduction of the E63, and the resulting impact on straight-line performance. This engine in the heavier S class will result in even more dissatisfaction for the torque addicted.
I love the W221, but this makes the S63 a difficult decision, particularly because it's only a matter of time before the twin turbo version fixes the problem.
Last edited by whoover; Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47 PM.
http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Sep06/1...otor_Show.html
The E55 crowd is fairly mutinous at this point because of the major torque reduction of the E63, and the resulting impact on straight-line performance. This engine in the heavier S class will result in even more dissatisfaction for the torque addicted.
I love the W221, but this makes the S63 a difficult decision, particularly because it's only a matter of time before the twin turbo version fixes the problem.
Ted
M



This sample of one will continue to drive an S55 until a replacement doesn't involve such a compromise.




My gut tells me the N/A 6.3 in S/CL is only for 1-2 years before they put in a mild turbocharger.(575hp)
This sample of one will continue to drive an S55 until a replacement doesn't involve such a compromise.
This sample of one will continue to drive an S55 until a replacement doesn't involve such a compromise.
M
Trending Topics
M
Ted
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Downside of 65 is tricky traction vs 55/63, esp on wet roads....one needs to be cautious w/even mid-range accel....annoying for a commuter car where one may be multi-tasking and not very traction-focused....
Not as big an issue for S, but more relevant for CL/SL is advantage of 63's some ?200+lb lighter motor than 65, esp over front wheels, in terms of steering feel/handling....and 63 exhaust note may be more interesting than 65's.....




Downside of 65 is tricky traction vs 55/63, esp on wet roads....one needs to be cautious w/even mid-range accel....annoying for a commuter car where one may be multi-tasking and not very traction-focused....
Not as big an issue for S, but more relevant for CL/SL is advantage of 63's some ?200+lb lighter motor than 65, esp over front wheels, in terms of steering feel/handling....and 63 exhaust note may be more interesting than 65's.....
What payments for example?
Given that both S/SL65 are unlikely to materially change in terms of technologies/aesthetics over next 2 yrs, would argue these terms are fairly cheap.....and allow one to roll into perhaps new NA AMG V12 upon expiration of this 65 lease.....
Always interesting to look at 2 yr lease terms of mfrs to find subtle discts that make MSRP and trade-in value comparisons less relevant, esp if one gets a car early in its product life cycle.....
Recently got an '07 SL65 and find car's chassis balance/steering to be remarkably improved over '06's; unless 599 or CL63/65 proves otherwise, to-date, I enjoy driving my 65 more than any P/F/MB I've ever driven.....but, even in dry conds, can sense tail-wagging w/semi-aggressive use of throttle in mid-range accel.....for rainy CA winters, I have a 997TT Tip for ultimate high-perf traction in daily use....and will get CL63 in Spr/Summ07 and see if 63 is indeed more balanced than 65 (and whether 63's trac makes 997TT irrelevant for winter duty).....and if 63 proves weak, will simply get a CL65 in Fall07 when it's released.....
Seeing the weight increase and torque loss of the S63 compared to the S55, I got my deposit back two weeks ago.
I have owned five fine Mercedes automobiles, but they currently do not make a vehicle that works for me.


