Interesting Test Drive Today....S65 vs. S600
I drove the car for the first time a few days ago with the salesman and my brother (who owns a stock S600) in the back seat. After a few short blasts I turned to my brother in the back seat and said "this things a turd"- to which he and the salesman fully agreed. It felt significantly slower than my brothers 600....it wouldn't even break the tires loose from a dead stop.
After suggesting to the dealer that maybe the intercooler pump was bad and other various possibilites they told me that they had just replaced the pump and assured me that was not the problem.....and that the "computer had been completely reset during the install and the car needs to re-learn the driving habits of the driver"...they assured me that over time the performance would improve. My brother and I both agreed that car needed about 100-130hp to make it right. I left empty handed and told them to call me when they found out what was wrong.
The salesman calls me 24hrs later and tells me he drove the car all day and it's "much better....night and day difference"....and that they changed nothing, just drove it. So, this morning I went for another test drive and indeed it WAS much better.....I'd say a 50-60% improvement since the day prior. So, just to be sure, my brother and I lined up his stock 600 next to me in the 65 (with the salesman riding shotgun with me) on a feeder road and got after it.....my brother pulled me both times. Not real bad, but he was definitely walking off on me. Once was from a 20-25mph punch and the other was 40-45- on both occassions I got my a** handed to me
. The salesman was just as surprised. We returned to the dealership and the head-tech says it's a combination of 2 things........low octane/bad gas (the car has been for sale for about 75 days and came from California where octane is as low as 85) and the ECU hasn't fully "re-learned" or adjusted for the drivers habits yet.
So, my questions are;
a) In a real world race (no magazine articles, etc) how bad should a stock '06 65 walk off on a stock '04 600....all else being equal.
b) Is it possible that bad gas (or low octane) and a computer that's been "reflashed" or "reset" would cause such a loss of power? Originally, I didn't think so- but after driving the car 24hrs later it DID improve substantially....I was very surprised.
c) If I drive the car aggressively will it slowly improve over time??
I guess what I'm worried about is going back next week, racing my brother and staying side-by-side with him? If that's the case, I'll buy a 600. The sole reason I'm looking at the 65 is becuase I want to be the fasted sedan on the road. I was always under the impression that the 65 would be .04-.05 faster than the 600 on the strip and would have no problem walking off on one from a roll. Am I wrong??
Thanks in advance for any feedback.....
-Busa196-

Tom
Last edited by TMC M5; Aug 16, 2008 at 08:06 PM.
S600 = 493hp and 590 lbs/ft torque
S65 = 604hp and 738 lbs/ft torque
S65 has 107 more hp and 148 more lbs/ft of torque.
Seems to me there should be no contest...S65 hands down.
Tom
also, imho, a well tuned 600 V12 TT is probably one of the smoothest running beasts on the road.....
Trending Topics
http://www.garage419.com/episode/419_20080807
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
, etc. so weight was as equal as it could be.
Nah, only kidding.....he's as curious as me as to the outcome.....he was planning on a 65 (W221) for his next car.....who knows now?? S600 = 493hp and 590 lbs/ft torque
S65 = 604hp and 738 lbs/ft torque
S65 has 107 more hp and 148 more lbs/ft of torque.
Seems to me there should be no contest...S65 hands down

My brother (“housclass” on this forum) and I had a chance to go back to the dealership yesterday and drive the 65 with some fresh gas. I actually let the salesman drive it while my brother and I were in the 600- I wanted no excuses if the 600 walked off on the 65 again.
After 3 blasts down the feeder road from a 25mph punch, the 65 walked away every time- but, it was by no means a “slaughter”. I’d say by the time we were at 120ish (no worries folks, private MB test facility)the 65 was 1.5 cars ahead?? Maybe my brother will chime in. This was the 3rd time we had test driven the car and it got noticeably faster each time. I’m now the proud owner of an ’06, CPO'd, Flint Gray S65 that gets a 9 of 10 in it's overall condition. After the 40 mile drive home and some short romp sessions I swear the car felt better by the time I got home. I have no doubt that after a week or two of me piloting her, she’ll be 100%.
What I’ve learned from this;
-What they say about the computer having to “learn” the habits of the driver are absolutely, positively true. I believe you have to drive it like you stole it if you want the car to perform like it’s supposed to.
-My brothers S600 friggin flies- for the very reason mentioned above. He drives his car hard everyday and I think that’s conducive to the way it performs. I’ll bet 600 for 600 his car would have a fairly significant advantage over the average grocery getter- and even a conservatively driven 65 as we’ve demonstrated.
Special thanks to my bro for showing me the ropes and guiding me to the world’s finest luxury sedan, IMO- and for making the continued trips to the dealership to act as a test dummy. Without him, his car, and a willing sales person to act as John Force this sale would not have happened.
I’ll post some pics later. Many thanks to all of you that chimed in.
-Busa196-
Congratulations!!! I am glad the S65 was able to work out whatever problems it was having with the bad gas. Flint gray is a beautiful color. Good luck with it...and you MUST to post pictures!!!
Tom
btw...the 65 was walking me good...amazing how driving a car hard can make such a HUGE difference!!!
Both are run on premium fuel. Beleive it or not the car learns how you drive.
Apart from better throttle response on the CL65 the power does not feel
vastly different but!! because I tend to drive it without passengers it's use
to being driven hard whereas the 600 normally has passengers and is being driven slower. However one day I took the 600 out and thrashed it, when I finished the brakes were moaning but the car felt like it was better than the CL. Also he's right, leave em for a week or more and they drive like crap.
It;s a bit off putting after a long drive cruising slowly I went for an overtake,
I had to brake and pull back, the fire had gone because of my slow cruissing.
To compare both cars they need the same fuel, and a good thrashing before
comparisons can be made. Sorry if I bored you.
Both are run on premium fuel. Beleive it or not the car learns how you drive.
Apart from better throttle response on the CL65 the power does not feel
vastly different but!! because I tend to drive it without passengers it's use
to being driven hard whereas the 600 normally has passengers and is being driven slower. However one day I took the 600 out and thrashed it, when I finished the brakes were moaning but the car felt like it was better than the CL. Also he's right, leave em for a week or more and they drive like crap.
It;s a bit off putting after a long drive cruising slowly I went for an overtake,
I had to brake and pull back, the fire had gone because of my slow cruissing.
To compare both cars they need the same fuel, and a good thrashing before
comparisons can be made. Sorry if I bored you.
Nope- no bore at all. My situation is a perfect example of what you've stated. I'm here to tell you, my 65 had to have gained 75-100HP over the 3 days of test driving.....and I have 2 witnesses to back it up. To go from losing badly to a 600, to walking off on one, takes a serious increase in HP. And, a few other AMG owners that I've talked to agree 100%. That being said, I don't plan on letting my car sit very long








