S55 AMG, S65 AMG , S63 AMG (W220, W221) 2001 - 2013 (Two Generations)

S63 or S65?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2019 | 07:54 PM
  #1  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
S63 or S65?



Hello everyone. New member here looking to purchase my first MB! My father has owned a couple, and I think that’s where my attraction began for them. I always have loved the W221 style and that’s what I am looking to purchase. I’m sure it has been posted and discussed previously, but being a new member I am not entirely sure how to begin searching for what could be countless answers. The following are what I am considering to purchase;

2010 S63 (6.2 N/A)
2011+ S63 (5.5 Bi-Turbo)
2010+ S65 (6.0 Bi-Turbo)

There is currently a 2010 S63 for sale locally within very reasonable price (see picture below of this exact model). From what I understand, the were two types of 7-Speed transmissions for the S63. Which year production was better? IF I do purchase the local 6.2 N/A do I really have to worry about head bolts like everyone claims? Does the 2010 have the better of the 7-Speed transmissions?

Or, if I decide to stay with the S63, should I hold out for a lower mileage Bi-Turbo? And if I do decide to go with the Bi-Turbo route, do I even bother with the S63 and just spend a little more coin on an S65? I could have sworn I read somewhere the 5-Speed transmissions in the S65 are not as good as the 7-Speed in the S63. Sorry for all the amateur questions, but this platform is new to me, and I’m eager to get behind the wheel of one. Thank you to anyone who can guide me in the right direction with this purchase. Below is a picture of the exact 2010 6.2 I would be considering.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 07:07 AM
  #2  
Jan AMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 119
From: Behind the wheel
The best or nothing
2011+ S63 (5.5 Bi-Turbo) sounds like the best bet.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 07:15 AM
  #3  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by Jan AMG
2011+ S63 (5.5 Bi-Turbo) sounds like the best bet.
Even if I can pick up that 2010 for a very low price? Like I had mentioned, if I do hold out for a 2011+ do I still consider the S63? Or look for an S65 at that point. Trying to figure out which model(s) have the best supporting transmission.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 07:47 AM
  #4  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,273
Likes: 3,916
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
Hmmm, do you have extra money to spend? Or a lot of extra money to spend?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by hyperion667
Hmmm, do you have extra money to spend? Or a lot of extra money to spend?
Depends on what’s a lot of “extra money”. Are you inferring maintenance cost or cost of repairs? Whichever model I go with, I will be purchasing an extended warranty regardless.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 08:24 AM
  #6  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,273
Likes: 3,916
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
Hope it works out for you mate, good luck to you!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 12:02 PM
  #7  
maw1124's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 363
'06 MB S55 AMG; '04 Audi Allroad 4.2; '05 BMW M3 Conv.; '92 MB 500E
Originally Posted by _MikeMoolah

Even if I can pick up that 2010 for a very low price? Like I had mentioned, if I do hold out for a 2011+ do I still consider the S63? Or look for an S65 at that point. Trying to figure out which model(s) have the best supporting transmission.
Yes, even if the 2010 is cheaper. The N/A was a bit underpowered for this chassis, IMO. Great for the E63, CLK63 and SL63, but borderline in the CL and a hair light in the S. The TTV8 has what it needs, which is why they cost more. As for the transmission question, see here... http://www.mercedesmedic.com/722-9-7...ems-solutions/ The differences are mostly about fuel efficiency. The 7GTronic couldn't support the engine start/stop function, which itself was about fuel efficiency (EPA CAFE regulations). The TTV12 in those years is about bragging rights IMO. Sure, its The Daddy, but it's also more costly in almost every conceivable manner, for extra power you probably don't need and most likely won't experience. But that depends upon you -- if you spend most of your time hustling around in the car with 4 grown adults and a boot full of luggage, maybe then the extra 4 cylinders and power is worth taking care of. But in those years, coil packs and ignition modules go almost at will, and nothing on the car is cheap. MB AMG didn't seem to get that remedied until the W222 chassis. Also, if the 63 has Airmatic and the 65 has ABC (which might be the case, I forget), then that's another reason to steer toward the 63. The major expenses on the W221 65 are coil packs, ignition modules and ABC system. Those 3 added together are 5-figure expenses by the time you deal with them. And if you have transmission issues (common on 65s because people tune the TCU and push them too hard), you're into regretting the purchase territory. The TCU on these cars cuts back torque delivery during shifts to protect the transmission. You start monkeying around with those safety parameters, and you're asking for transmission failure, which plenty of people have learned after the fact. Finally, brakes are costly on these cars and the heavier the car (65), the more you end up spending on brakes.

GL

maw

Last edited by maw1124; Jan 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 12:21 PM
  #8  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by maw1124
Yes, even if the 2010 is cheaper. The N/A was a bit underpowered for this chassis, IMO. Great for the E63, CLK63 and SL63, but borderline in the CL and a hair light in the S. The TTV8 has what it needs, which is why they cost more. As for the transmission question, see here... http://www.mercedesmedic.com/722-9-7...ems-solutions/ The differences are mostly about fuel efficiency. The 7GTronic couldn't support the engine start/stop function, which itself was about fuel efficiency (EPA CAFE regulations). The TTV12 in those years is about bragging rights IMO. Sure, its The Daddy, but it's also more costly in almost every conceivable manner, for extra power you probably don't need and most likely won't experience. But that depends upon you -- if you spend most of your time hustling around in the car with 4 grown adults and a boot full of luggage, maybe then the extra 4 cylinders and power is worth taking care of. But in those years, coil packs and ignition modules go almost at will, and nothing on the car is cheap. MB AMG didn't seem to get that remedied until the W222 chassis. Also, if the 63 has Airmatic and the 65 has ABC (which might be the case, I forget), then that's another reason to steer toward the 63. The major expenses on the W221 65 are coil packs, ignition modules and ABC system. Those 3 added together are 5-figure expenses by the time you deal with them. And if you have transmission issues (common on 65s because people tune the TCU and push them too hard), you're into regretting the purchase territory. The TCU on these cars cuts back torque delivery during shifts to protect the transmission. You start monkeying around with those safety parameters, and you're asking for transmission failure, which plenty of people have learned after the fact. Finally, brakes are costly on these cars and the heavier the car (65), the more you end up spending on brakes.

GL

maw
Excellent feedback, this is exactly what I have been searching for. The 2010 is CLEAN, and I absolutely fell in love with the look and all it’s options. But if the 2011+ Bi-Turbo is the better option, then I will hold out for that. Not to mention with some simple parts and a reflash the V8 can easily compare to the power of the V12. I will read up on that transmission link you provided as well. Thanks for making my decision easier!
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 04:04 PM
  #9  
JohnLane's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 1,209
From: Phoenix
222 S-65
OP look at interior in the V-8 car VS the S-65. S-65 got the best of everything. I'm particularly fond of the diamond stitched leather in the S-65.

Brakes are the same in S-63 vs S-65. Brake rotors on hats are readily available as replacements for expensive heavy stock parts.
S-63 with rear drive will have ABC. All wheel drive cars got Airmatic.

The seven speed box is busy shifting all the time. The bent-12 makes enough torque that more ratios are not really needed. That said... I look forward to buying a 222 chassis S-65 with that seven speed box.

The radio sucks in 221 cars. 222 cars got Burmeister sound that is the best I have heard in a car.

My 221 car has required some painful repairs. Love driving the dumb thing!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 06:33 PM
  #10  
maw1124's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 363
'06 MB S55 AMG; '04 Audi Allroad 4.2; '05 BMW M3 Conv.; '92 MB 500E
4Matic 63 cars didn’t come along until W222, which he’s not looking at. He’s after a W221. All W221 cars may have ABC, and that’s good info about the brakes. Yes the diamond stitched interior on the 65 cars is bad ***. But you pay for it elsewhere. Best advice is drive them both, and don’t make a keyboard decision. Coil packs and ignition modules really hampered the pre-W222 65 cars.

maw
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by maw1124
4Matic 63 cars didn’t come along until W222, which he’s not looking at. He’s after a W221. All W221 cars may have ABC, and that’s good info about the brakes. Yes the diamond stitched interior on the 65 cars is bad ***. But you pay for it elsewhere. Best advice is drive them both, and don’t make a keyboard decision. Coil packs and ignition modules really hampered the pre-W222 65 cars.

maw
I think I have officially ruled out the option of an S65. At this point it’s between the 6.2 or the 5.5 looking for the better motor far as reliability, and which of the 2 have the better 7-Speed trans. I understand power can be easily added to both platforms regardless of decision. Just trying to figure out which is best.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 11:42 PM
  #12  
maw1124's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 363
'06 MB S55 AMG; '04 Audi Allroad 4.2; '05 BMW M3 Conv.; '92 MB 500E
Originally Posted by _MikeMoolah


I think I have officially ruled out the option of an S65. At this point it’s between the 6.2 or the 5.5 looking for the better motor far as reliability, and which of the 2 have the better 7-Speed trans. I understand power can be easily added to both platforms regardless of decision. Just trying to figure out which is best.
You're kidding, right? Within the chassis run, they've upgraded both the engine and the transmission, and you're trying to make a decision? Here's a hint, you want the latest, lowest mileage, best optioned car you can afford. If you have a native preference for natural aspiration (right now power) over forced induction, it's an easy decision the other way + you save money up front by buying an older car. Either way, these are rather clear choices.

maw
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2019 | 11:00 AM
  #13  
JohnLane's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,613
Likes: 1,209
From: Phoenix
222 S-65
OP if it will be a bent eight the only one worth choosing is the turbo 5.5 liter.

As Maw mentioned above... As new as you can manage... If you are not handy about mechanical/electronic issues.... Be sure that you pay for the longest warranty that covers everything about it.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2019 | 01:17 PM
  #14  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by JohnLane
OP if it will be a bent eight the only one worth choosing is the turbo 5.5 liter.

As Maw mentioned above... As new as you can manage... If you are not handy about mechanical/electronic issues.... Be sure that you pay for the longest warranty that covers everything about it.
I was leaning towards the 5.5 from the start, just thought this deal was another great option. And yes, I definitely agree on the warranty as you mentioned.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2019 | 05:21 PM
  #15  
Fly by night's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 314
Likes: 5
E class
2012 or 2013 S63 5.5
owned 10 AMG cars over the years this is by FAR the best
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2019 | 06:43 PM
  #16  
_MikeMoolah's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
AMG
Originally Posted by Fly by night
2012 or 2013 S63 5.5
owned 10 AMG cars over the years this is by FAR the best
awesome!!
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE