SL/R129: URGETN, Need advice on R129: good price or not&
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Almaty
URGETN, Need advice on R129: good price or not&
I have an opprotunity to purchase SL 55 AMG 1998 silver 90K km, fully loaded, including Alpine stereo and video system (~$10K) and new 19" titan-firbe weels ($9K). Though, it has no hard top. The first image from the left (on a parking lot).
Along with transportation and customs costs, it will cost me $62 - 65K in Russia.
Shall I go for it?
P.S. the car is perfect, one owner, and I have been looking for it for 2 years.
well, there is another one, registered in 2000, 90K as well, just plain SL 55 AMG with a panorama hard top, but, will cost me $80-83K. The second image from the left (in a showroom).
Along with transportation and customs costs, it will cost me $62 - 65K in Russia.
Shall I go for it?
P.S. the car is perfect, one owner, and I have been looking for it for 2 years.
well, there is another one, registered in 2000, 90K as well, just plain SL 55 AMG with a panorama hard top, but, will cost me $80-83K. The second image from the left (in a showroom).
Last edited by Asset; Aug 2, 2006 at 06:57 AM. Reason: describe attached pictures
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal.
SL500 2001 Formula 1 Edition;
SL AMG's are pretty rare, so it is hard to find a price comparison.
This link says that fewer than 300 SL's were given the AMG "treatment" before 2003:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_SL-Class
If that is true, given that you are talking about a very limited production, you are not really in a position to price shop.
However, you can find comparable Brabus cars for less money -- someone in Los Angeles, who posted here, was selling a 1998 with $50,000 worth of Brabus mods for $38,000 a month or two ago.
But I would go with the AMG because it is considered "factory" and it is a rare and amazing car.
This link says that fewer than 300 SL's were given the AMG "treatment" before 2003:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_SL-Class
If that is true, given that you are talking about a very limited production, you are not really in a position to price shop.
However, you can find comparable Brabus cars for less money -- someone in Los Angeles, who posted here, was selling a 1998 with $50,000 worth of Brabus mods for $38,000 a month or two ago.
But I would go with the AMG because it is considered "factory" and it is a rare and amazing car.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal.
SL500 2001 Formula 1 Edition;
Originally Posted by HLG600
There never was an R129 SL55 AMG; the SL55 AMG was introduced in R230 form. The only factory R129 AMG's are the SL60 and SL73. 
The SL55 AMG was sold through AMG in the R129 bodystyle from 1998 to 2001 in limited quantity. It was the predecessor of the production R230 SL55 AMG sold today.
Certainly, wikipedia could be wrong.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 341
From: NJ
2009 SL63 AMG
Anyone can post info on Wikipedia; I'd love to be shown otherwise, but there is no such thing as an R129 SL55. MB-AMG never made a production R129 with the naturally aspirated 5.4 Litre V8. I am sure custom jobs have been done, but I have never heard of a factory R129 SL55.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Almaty
Originally Posted by HLG600
Anyone can post info on Wikipedia; I'd love to be shown otherwise, but there is no such thing as an R129 SL55. MB-AMG never made a production R129 with the naturally aspirated 5.4 Litre V8. I am sure custom jobs have been done, but I have never heard of a factory R129 SL55.
Actually, there are only 55 and 73 from 1998 till aug 2001. check this link http://www.autonet.ru/catalogs/auto/.../serie/SL.html
though it is in Russian, you can easily figure out the models, year, technical data, and see some really small pictures
here is some technical info on 55 R129, from http://www.mbclubs.ru/w129t.php3
Model; Year; Engine; Displt; Type; PS/kWt; Нм; Max speed; sec to 100 km/h
SL 55 AMG; 98-01; M119 AMG; 5439; V8; 354/260; 530; 250; 5,9 sec
SL 60 AMG; 93-98; M119 AMG; 5956; V8; 381/280; 580; 250; 5,6 sec
SL 73 AMG; 99-01; M120 AMG; 7291; V12; 525/385; 750; 300; 4,8 sec
Alright guys, thank you all! I will get the car, do some restyling (mostly interior), take pictures (before and after restyling) and post them here. It will be seen here in about 1,5-2 months!!!
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 341
From: NJ
2009 SL63 AMG
Interesting info, thanks.
One thing though, it lists the motor used in the R129 SL55 as an M119, which is the same base motor used in the 500SL/SL500 and SL60 from 1990-1998. What I am trying to figure out is why MB would downrate their 6.0 Litre M119 to a 5.4 (or 5.5) Litre M119? I don't think it can be the N/A 5.4 Litre we see today in the C55 SLK55 CLK55 because that is not an M119. These newer ones, which were available in the US market in 2001, had a 3V per cylinder configuration, while the M119's had a 4V per cylinder configuration. Either this was simply a name change, or it was the not the M119.
Regardless, best of luck with the car and don't forget the pics! Welcome to MBWorld!
HLG
One thing though, it lists the motor used in the R129 SL55 as an M119, which is the same base motor used in the 500SL/SL500 and SL60 from 1990-1998. What I am trying to figure out is why MB would downrate their 6.0 Litre M119 to a 5.4 (or 5.5) Litre M119? I don't think it can be the N/A 5.4 Litre we see today in the C55 SLK55 CLK55 because that is not an M119. These newer ones, which were available in the US market in 2001, had a 3V per cylinder configuration, while the M119's had a 4V per cylinder configuration. Either this was simply a name change, or it was the not the M119.
Regardless, best of luck with the car and don't forget the pics! Welcome to MBWorld!
HLG
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Almaty
Originally Posted by HLG600
... had a 3V per cylinder configuration, while the M119's had a 4V per cylinder configuration.
HLG
HLG
Sure I'll post the pictures.
Thank you!
