SL-Class (R230) 2003 -- 2012: Discussion on the SL500, SL550, SL600

SL/R230: Rear rotor and brake dust question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-05-2010, 04:44 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
aldouschiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmw M3 Convertible, SL550 AMG
Rear rotor and brake dust question

All,
I have notice my SL550 has more brake dust and rotor wear than front which doesn't make sense to me. My front rotor looks great not much wear no lip or anything but the rear rotor has much more than front. It generates more brake dust then front as well. Anybody has same experience? Any idea will be greatly appreciated!

Aldous
Old 11-05-2010, 05:23 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
pflowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 SL550
Change to ceramic pads with new stock rotors. That will eliminate any brake dust problems and give you better brakeing. I just did this and I also noticed that the rears were creating more dust than the fronts prior to the change. The whole job should be about $500. Use the Akebono pads.

Last edited by pflowers; 11-05-2010 at 05:30 PM.
Old 11-05-2010, 10:37 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StephenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
My fronts always have considerably more brake dust than the rears.
Old 11-05-2010, 11:22 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
aldouschiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmw M3 Convertible, SL550 AMG
I actually ordered Akebono pads last week and fixing to change both front and rear brake pads. I guess I need to order rear rotors. Any suggestion on good cross drilled rear rotors?
The wear on those rear rotors kind of surprise me. Any thoughts there might be some issue with adjustment ratio between front and rear. I thought front should always more brake dust as it should wear more than rear. My case just the opposite.
Old 11-05-2010, 11:35 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
pflowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 SL550
The stock rotors are fine unless you plan to put the car on a track. Stock fronts are drilled but the rears are solid. After changing the pads and rotors there is almost no dust on either the front or rear.

Last edited by pflowers; 11-05-2010 at 11:40 PM.
Old 11-05-2010, 11:57 PM
  #6  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
aldouschiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmw M3 Convertible, SL550 AMG
Yes, my front is drilled and rear is solid. I was hoping if I can get drilled rotors to match the front. Do you mind if I ask how much dealer charge for rear rotors?
Old 11-06-2010, 07:33 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
pflowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 SL550
Stock rotors are about $90 each. There are some after market rotors available. Do a search in this forum to find a recommendation.

Last edited by pflowers; 11-06-2010 at 07:38 AM.
Old 11-06-2010, 08:46 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StapleGun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1967 Morris Cooper "S", 1983 911SC, 1997 Toyota Tacoma, 1999 HD FXSTB, 1998 C43
Ceramic pads

The harder the compound the more wear/friction thus dust - I like to replace pads versus spending substantially more on rotors, again just me.
Old 11-06-2010, 11:29 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Rook3300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 SL500
On consumer vehicles (and most race vehicles) the brakes are used more on the front wheels than the rear. This greatly enhances stability and control under moderate to severe braking. If your braking was more rear-biased, then the car would want to enter corners rear-end first due to the rear wheels stopping better than the fronts. Hence, the front wheels will always have more brake dust on them than the rears.

If you are trying to get rid of the brake dust, then switch to ceramic brake pads. Anecdotal evidence has shown that you could wear down your rotors more quickly than with the OEM pads. Just something to consider -- there's always a trade-off.

-ROOK
Old 11-06-2010, 10:13 PM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
aldouschiu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmw M3 Convertible, SL550 AMG
Ordered lowering link, rear rotors and Akebono brake pad for front and rear. Hopefully I will get them next week!
Old 11-07-2010, 12:04 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Lee Wireless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 211
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
1995 SL500 - 2017 AMG GLC 43
The SBC system does not function as others have described in some of the posts above. I like they thought the same thing but was corrected by the attached pdf supplied to me by a mechanic whom I'm on a first name basis with at the dealership. As you can see from the pdf, the system is NOT setup like non-SBC systems. I asked why I needed rear brakes when he told me they were worn but the front were fine. He laughed and said until he was trained on the operation of SBC he didn't understand it either. See attached pdf explaining SBC operation.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Sensotronic Brake Control-2.pdf (1.30 MB, 989 views)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL/R230: Rear rotor and brake dust question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.