SL/R232: R232 First Driving Reviews are Out
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a38737707/2022-mercedes-amg-sl-drive/
https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-re...z/sl-roadster/
https://www.motor1.com/reviews/560129/2022-mercedes-amg-sl-first-drive/
https://www.autoblog.com/2022/01/11/...amg-sl-review/
https://www.gearpatrol.com/cars/g386...g-sl63-review/
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...-drive-review/
https://www.thedetroitbureau.com/rev...des-amg-sl-55/
https://www.whichcar.com.au/reviews/...ew-first-drive
Last edited by unit; Jan 11, 2022 at 08:01 PM.
Motor Authority
Last edited by js_cls; Jan 12, 2022 at 02:05 AM.




https://www.roadandtrack.com/reviews...amg-sl-review/
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
M




But we didn’t see the V8 SL55 coming either…
Last edited by js_cls; Jan 13, 2022 at 09:53 AM.




https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...10FB23E4D4E6B5
It looks to me like the automotive press wrote as much as they could without violating the January 15 embargo. There are no test results with hard numbers. Some articles refer to the manufacturer's acceleration estimates (3.5 seconds 0-60 mph, or 3.6 seconds 0-100 kph for the SL63), and some hint that their own tests will be better.
I'd be willing to bet that the various mags have already done their track tests -- 0-30, 0-60, 0-100, quarter-mile time and speed, lateral g maximum, slalom times, and so on -- and will update their articles over the weekend or early next week to provide real numbers.
I'd be willing to bet that the various mags have already done their track tests -- 0-30, 0-60, 0-100, quarter-mile time and speed, lateral g maximum, slalom times, and so on -- and will update their articles over the weekend or early next week to provide real numbers.
Last edited by js_cls; Jan 14, 2022 at 11:43 AM.
I did see it in the flesh and sat into it last July, but no possibility to drive. It looks and feels like a very much upgraded AMG GT Roadster (in seat position, interior space, etc), only with more kilo's, but that might be only an issue when you drive it on track (that not many people will do, at least I would not).




I did see it in the flesh and sat into it last July, but no possibility to drive. It looks and feels like a very much upgraded AMG GT Roadster (in seat position, interior space, etc), only with more kilo's, but that might be only an issue when you drive it on track (that not many people will do, at least I would not).
GT Roadsters are just jarring in all models, IMO. No matter the setting chosen, it never feels "soft" enough. It isn't a car that I would be able to talk my fiance into for a Sunday drive. The power, however, does feel very similar. The SL isn't as tail happy as the GT is having AWD. I did my best to get the car unsettled and no matter what I did it felt like a slot car perfectly planted on the track.




GT Roadsters are just jarring in all models, IMO. No matter the setting chosen, it never feels "soft" enough. It isn't a car that I would be able to talk my fiance into for a Sunday drive. The power, however, does feel very similar. The SL isn't as tail happy as the GT is having AWD. I did my best to get the car unsettled and no matter what I did it felt like a slot car perfectly planted on the track.
She loves the GTC and takes it over the SL because it has something that isn't discussed here at all. The GTC is agile and nimble like no other SL ever was. It feels balanced and light-footed unlike any other MB for that matter. The main reason is the the engine doesn't sit on the front wheels like the SL and that the transmission is not attached to the engine (like the SL) but a transaxle (attached to the rear axle). It also has rear wheel steering, great steering feel and is lightweight.
Since the new SL not only replaces the old SL, but also the AMG GT roadsters and S-Class Cabs, the question is just how will this car fits these audiences. I for one will have to compare to the GTC, not our prior SL.
Am not critical but getting a softer E63s without a top wouldn't be compelling if it isn't as much fun to drive as our current top down ride.
She loves the GTC and takes it over the SL because it has something that isn't discussed here at all. The GTC is agile and nimble like no other SL ever was. It feels balanced and light-footed unlike any other MB for that matter. The main reason is the the engine doesn't sit on the front wheels like the SL and that the transmission is not attached to the engine (like the SL) but a transaxle (attached to the rear axle). It also has rear wheel steering, great steering feel and is lightweight.
Since the new SL not only replaces the old SL, but also the AMG GT roadsters and S-Class Cabs, the question is just how will this car fits these audiences. I for one will have to compare to the GTC, not our prior SL.
Am not critical but getting a softer E63s without a top wouldn't be compelling if it isn't as much fun to drive as our current top down ride.




She loves the GTC and takes it over the SL because it has something that isn't discussed here at all. The GTC is agile and nimble like no other SL ever was. It feels balanced and light-footed unlike any other MB for that matter. The main reason is the the engine doesn't sit on the front wheels like the SL and that the transmission is not attached to the engine (like the SL) but a transaxle (attached to the rear axle). It also has rear wheel steering, great steering feel and is lightweight.
Since the new SL not only replaces the old SL, but also the AMG GT roadsters and S-Class Cabs, the question is just how will this car fits these audiences. I for one will have to compare to the GTC, not our prior SL.
Am not critical but getting a softer E63s without a top wouldn't be compelling if it isn't as much fun to drive as our current top down ride.



