SL/R232: SL R232 Tuning to 805hp


Mercedes-AMG SL 2022 ‣ performmaster ‣ Exclusive AMG tuning

I'm not ready to try this but if anyone else does I'd love to hear how it goes.
Stroked 427 with 640 HP naturally aspirated.
Mercedes-AMG SL 2022 ‣ performmaster ‣ Exclusive AMG tuning

I'm not ready to try this but if anyone else does I'd love to hear how it goes.




My only concern would be the transmission handling the extra torque. That said, anybody tuning their cars pays to play. There is always a risk of a big bill but safety should not be impacted...
Last edited by Wolfman; Jan 31, 2023 at 11:53 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG










According to RT, the 63 is still stronger as they use their own dyno numbers and show the stock 63 as 625hp and the tuned 55 at 579hp.
As for tuning, it has to be understood that in case of engine issues MB can void the warranty and it will take a lot of work and force to get any money out of a tuner, no matter what they promise.
MB is more lax than BMW when it comes to tunes but I know of a couple E63s cars that were blacklisted. Pay to play...
In general though, the SL55 feels like its offering more bang for the buck, in terms of value, not performance.
According to RT, the 63 is still stronger as they use their own dyno numbers and show the stock 63 as 625hp and the tuned 55 at 579hp.
As for tuning, it has to be understood that in case of engine issues MB can void the warranty and it will take a lot of work and force to get any money out of a tuner, no matter what they promise.
MB is more lax than BMW when it comes to tunes but I know of a couple E63s cars that were blacklisted. Pay to play...
In general though, the SL55 feels like its offering more bang for the buck, in terms of value, not performance.
Here from MB Engineer after I asked the question... Both the 55 and 63 trim levels are powered by AMG’s 4.0-liter, twin-turbocharged V8.The 63 gets some additional boost pressure and goosed software to deliver the additional oomph.
So its like BMW and their M cars and M Competition models..
Last edited by amgeater2; Jul 14, 2023 at 11:52 AM.
I am actually more interested in an exhaust upgrade since the 63 is pretty fast as is: any input on a new exhaust creating a warranty issue?




So its like BMW and their M cars and M Competition models..
So there will be some hardware differences just like in many of the other 4.0 liter AMG engines.




I am actually more interested in an exhaust upgrade since the 63 is pretty fast as is: any input on a new exhaust creating a warranty issue?
That means Renntech is up for the claim if they guarantee it. Be curious if they would really pay.
Exhausts should be no issue IMO. The manufacturer can only cancel coverage on the affected item and that is pulled. I would keep the original exhaust/cats in case of resale (lower value and emissions compliance).
So there will be some hardware differences just like in many of the other 4.0 liter AMG engines.
Last edited by amgeater2; Jul 14, 2023 at 03:25 PM.
I am actually more interested in an exhaust upgrade since the 63 is pretty fast as is: any input on a new exhaust creating a warranty issue?




Here is their Renntech's data, based on dyno results.
SL55 Stock Dyno measured by RENNtech (peak): 489 HP @ 4,900rpm; 582 LB-FT @ 3,400rpm
SL55 Tuned - Rated by RENNtech (peak @crank): 579 HP @ 5,050rpm; 664 LB-FT @ 3,350rpm
SL63 Stock Dyno measured by RENNtech (peak): 625 HP | 681 LB-FT
SL63 Tuned - Rated by RENNtech (peak @crank): 721 HP | 748 LB-FT
Opposite, you just quoted some MB engineer (or was it just a tech at the dealer) providing a quote that should not come out of an engineers mouth. No specifics whatsoever but with some goosed up software. Why don't you help the forum in contacting said engineer and ask him to provide specific details?




But it has been surprising that all engine outputs for the SL are below what these engines deliver in other cars. Even the SL43 is well below the power output of the engine in the CLA45.
The SL55 power is actually surprisingly similar to the non-AMG version of the same engine (M176). This is the standard Mercedes V8, which also was originally developed by AMG. These use single scroll turbos. So looking at the old W222 S560 S-Class, here is a comparison.
The only reason why I use Renntech numbers is that their dyno numbers provide for some consistency across models, along with stock figures.
S560:
Rated by Mercedes-Benz: 463 HP @ 5,250-6,000rpm; 516 LB-FT @ 2,000-4,000rpm
Dyno measured by RENNtech: 484 HP @ 5,600rpm; 538 LB-FT @ 4,750rpm
SL55:
Rated by Mercedes-Benz (avg.): 469 HP @ 5,500-6,250rpm; 516 LB-FT @ 2,250-4,500rpm
Dyno measured by RENNtech (peak): 489 HP @ 4,900rpm; 582 LB-FT @ 3,400rpm
Both engines even seem to tune to roughly the same power output.
Like others, I am eager to discover the exact specs of this particular engine and if for some reason, power is throttled perhaps for things like emissions reporting where MB is paying heavy penalties in Germany.
Last edited by Wolfman; Jul 14, 2023 at 04:38 PM.




