SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 sound
10-24-2005, 11:18 PM
#2
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK430
10-25-2005, 12:52 AM
#3
Before you spend a few grand, I'd cut off my resonators first, in fact before dropping four digit numbers for an exhaust, I did replace my resonators on a lot of our cars with a straight pipe.
The sound difference is amazing, but remember this, you have a turboed car, and the turbos muffle the engine exhaust quite a lot.
The sound difference is amazing, but remember this, you have a turboed car, and the turbos muffle the engine exhaust quite a lot.
10-27-2005, 08:08 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Palm, Fl
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL65/BENTLEY GT
It's not as muffled as it seems from the inside. I was driving another car as my wife trailed me. She came screaming by me like a jet and the sound was loud and intimidating. She didn't hear what I heard, but it was fun hearing what others hear as you fly past them. I was very much in awe!
10-29-2005, 01:16 AM
#6
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry for non topic, but it is in the theme of sl65 so i didnt think to create a new topic on this question. I wonder why the mercedes s65amg and sl65amg both have the same engine, but the one is a tank and the other is a rocket, but they both have the same acceleration? Why is that? I dont get it
Mercedes says 4.2 for both of them. I mean whats the point then?
Mercedes says 4.2 for both of them. I mean whats the point then?
10-29-2005, 01:26 AM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
Sorry for non topic, but it is in the theme of sl65 so i didnt think to create a new topic on this question. I wonder why the mercedes s65amg and sl65amg both have the same engine, but the one is a tank and the other is a rocket, but they both have the same acceleration? Why is that? I dont get it Mercedes says 4.2 for both of them. I mean whats the point then?
Mercedes says 4.2 for both of them. I mean whats the point then?Trending Topics
10-29-2005, 01:30 AM
#8
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it still weights much much less than the tank s65 man, so what you talking about? Who knows bettter than the manufacturer itself Certainly not the owner of the sl65 that thinks he goes in 2.5 sec BTW you didn't explain my question at all
Who knows bettter than the manufacturer itself Certainly not the owner of the sl65 that thinks he goes in 2.5 sec BTW you didn't explain my question at all
10-29-2005, 02:00 AM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
S65- 4894lb
SL65- 4564lb
CL65- 4654lb
SL and CL weigh about the same...S out weigh's them both. I already said, MB underrates there cars. And what SL65 can go zero to sixty in 2.5 sec?
SL65- 4564lb
CL65- 4654lb
SL and CL weigh about the same...S out weigh's them both. I already said, MB underrates there cars. And what SL65 can go zero to sixty in 2.5 sec?
10-29-2005, 02:10 AM
#10
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow wait a sec here guyz.... First i was not telling it goes 2.5 i was just emphacizing my point that the owner will almost alwayss say higher numbers.. Second of all Mercedes do not underate their numbers at all, more than that they write even lower numbers that almost always non of the review professionals can achieve.. Meaning they say for example we did 8.5 instead of 7.5 what Benz says. So the thing here is why would mercedes do such a thing if they almost weight the same, it doenst make sense at all than I mean why would you pay 50k more for the same perfomance,and only two seats instead of getting a plane like an S65. I don't get that, still nobody could answer the question..... Why s65 and sl65 are the same perfomance?
Also if it weights the almost the same as the plane(s65) it is not much of a sport car as Mercedes wants it to be......
So the thing here is why would mercedes do such a thing if they almost weight the same, it doenst make sense at all than I mean why would you pay 50k more for the same perfomance,and only two seats instead of getting a plane like an S65. I don't get that, still nobody could answer the question..... Why s65 and sl65 are the same perfomance?Also if it weights the almost the same as the plane(s65) it is not much of a sport car as Mercedes wants it to be......
10-29-2005, 02:17 AM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
Wow wait a sec here guyz.... First i was not telling it goes 2.5 i was just emphacizing my point that the owner will almost alwayss say higher numbers.. Second of all Mercedes do not underate their numbers at all, more than that they write even lower numbers that almost always non of the review professionals can achieve.. Meaning they say for example we did 8.5 instead of 7.5 what Benz says. So the thing here is why would mercedes do such a thing if they almost weight the same, it doenst make sense at all than I mean why would you pay 50k more for the same perfomance,and only two seats instead of getting a plane like an S65. I don't get that, still nobody could answer the question..... Why s65 and sl65 are the same perfomance?
Also if it weights the almost the same as the plane(s65) it is not much of a sport car as Mercedes wants it to be......
So the thing here is why would mercedes do such a thing if they almost weight the same, it doenst make sense at all than I mean why would you pay 50k more for the same perfomance,and only two seats instead of getting a plane like an S65. I don't get that, still nobody could answer the question..... Why s65 and sl65 are the same perfomance?Also if it weights the almost the same as the plane(s65) it is not much of a sport car as Mercedes wants it to be......
10-29-2005, 02:19 AM
#12
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You didnt answer my question.... Why would they, are their marketing manager stupid or something. So you saying they write the same acceleration for 185k(2 seater) and 170k(plane) that wouldn't be smart from their part.... 
10-29-2005, 02:22 AM
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
You didnt answer my question.... Why would they, are their marketing manager stupid or something. So you saying they write the same acceleration for 185k(2 seater) and 170k(plane) that wouldn't be smart from their part....
10-29-2005, 02:26 AM
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
I just talled you the example... It wouldn't be smart!
10-29-2005, 02:29 AM
#16
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No they don't underate their cars)) MAn common TELL ME THE REASON WHY? WHY WOULD MCLAREN F1 say their car goes 5 sec instead of 2.1??????????????? I dont get it TEll me then the real numbers, if you believe that. BTW they are selling it cause ppl who buy that don't care much, plus it is damn fast, but this case doesnt make sense and I want to know the truth here...
)) MAn common TELL ME THE REASON WHY? WHY WOULD MCLAREN F1 say their car goes 5 sec instead of 2.1??????????????? I dont get it TEll me then the real numbers, if you believe that. BTW they are selling it cause ppl who buy that don't care much, plus it is damn fast, but this case doesnt make sense and I want to know the truth here...
10-29-2005, 02:30 AM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
No they don't underate their cars)) MAn common TELL ME THE REASON WHY? WHY WOULD MCLAREN F1 say their car goes 5 sec instead of 2.1??????????????? I dont get it TEll me then the real numbers, if you believe that. BTW they are selling it cause ppl who buy that don't care much, plus it is damn fast, but this case doesnt make sense and I want to know the truth here...
)) MAn common TELL ME THE REASON WHY? WHY WOULD MCLAREN F1 say their car goes 5 sec instead of 2.1??????????????? I dont get it TEll me then the real numbers, if you believe that. BTW they are selling it cause ppl who buy that don't care much, plus it is damn fast, but this case doesnt make sense and I want to know the truth here...
10-29-2005, 02:36 AM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
88 Caddy on 28's
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
You don't know dude, don't answer like this eny more Just believe what you do You better get me the real numbers than It better be sl65 in less than 4 sec...
Just believe what you do You better get me the real numbers than It better be sl65 in less than 4 sec...
10-29-2005, 08:26 AM
#21
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MJ1133
What knowledge you got? That they underrate their race cars, oh good for you BTW im not talking about s55 or sl55 TEll me the real numbers than!
Btw who can explain the answer to me? .....
What knowledge you got? That they underrate their race cars, oh good for you
BTW im not talking about s55 or sl55 TEll me the real numbers than!Btw who can explain the answer to me? .....
Last edited by CRAZY-MERC-FAN; 10-29-2005 at 08:29 AM.
10-29-2005, 11:07 AM
#22
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bethesda,Md.
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
MJ1133
What knowledge you got? That they underrate their race cars, oh good for you BTW im not talking about s55 or sl55 TEll me the real numbers than!
Btw who can explain the answer to me? .....
What knowledge you got? That they underrate their race cars, oh good for you
BTW im not talking about s55 or sl55 TEll me the real numbers than!Btw who can explain the answer to me? .....
One is a convertible one is a sedan. They have the same engine and weigh about the same. I already have a sedan and wanted a nice convertible. What is hard to understand about that? If someone wants an mix of both they get the CL65.
10-29-2005, 01:03 PM
#23
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So basically they are the same accelration ..... Well i thought that s65 was much sportier, and faster or at least suppose to be faster. I mean it doesnt make sense to get in to 2 seater for exact the same perfomance as the large and big sedan.
10-29-2005, 03:11 PM
#25
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bethesda,Md.
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bentley Arnage Red Label
Originally Posted by CRAZY-MERC-FAN
So basically they are the same accelration ..... Well i thought that s65 was much sportier, and faster or at least suppose to be faster. I mean it doesnt make sense to get in to 2 seater for exact the same perfomance as the large and big sedan.
