SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Good Bye DB9... Hello SL65
TIA
Edit - Here is a better article: http://autopark.blogspot.com/2006/02...-facelift.html
Edit - More info: http://www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm...class-in-depth
I think the ABC is updated and the engine management is enhanced a bit. Plus some other under the hood changes. If you're **** about having the latest & geatest I'd go for the '07, else you might want to pick up a discounted '06.
Last edited by sprins; Apr 1, 2006 at 04:44 PM.
So for just a little more money, The SL65 is a 360F1 and a Continental GT rolled into one, and there is a Mercedes dealer everywhere you go just in case.
Trending Topics
The lack of comfort surprised me the most, the DB9 is more of a hardcore sportscar than my SL55. With the I can drive both relaxed and sporty, with the DB9 you can only drive sporty.
And although the interior materials are of high quality, the finish in my SL55 and the feel of the material is superior to the DB9s.
My conclusion: The SL55 was and is the right car for me, and the DB9 disappointed me a bit.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The lack of comfort surprised me the most, the DB9 is more of a hardcore sportscar than my SL55. With the I can drive both relaxed and sporty, with the DB9 you can only drive sporty.
And although the interior materials are of high quality, the finish in my SL55 and the feel of the material is superior to the DB9s.
My conclusion: The SL55 was and is the right car for me, and the DB9 disappointed me a bit.
I got the same impresions as you. My neighbor brought home a demo yesterday and we took it out for a while and I was a bit disapointed. I think it looks great although this one was burgundy which doesn't work for me but like previously stated the nav and stereo buttons are tiny and tough to get used to. The power was ok and the sound was ok but not better. My SL just seemed to me like it does everything better but it does have the looks and the exlusivity that the SL will never have. I have the Bentley Cont. Convert on order and when that comes in it will have to do one hell of a job to make me give the SL the boot!
Nice gearbox though, better the SLs when used in manual mode and certainly exclusive, got far more looks from other people than the SL which looks from the front just like any other Mercedes at first glance and the SL's need for the trunk lid, rear window and top roof section to be pretty much the same length imposes limits all of its own.
The Bentley Continental's success is one of life's great mysteries to me...
That said, I'm not convinced the SL65 feels special enough for the price. There's only one car I'd consider to replace the SL55 and that's a Ferrari F599 Fiorano.
Last edited by blueSL; Apr 10, 2006 at 01:14 PM.
Of course the GT's success is a mystery to you.
You are a Sepo, look at what you export: Stupid RAP music and all the propoganda associated with it.
Class is not something that you can buy, it has to be appreciated. Something you Sepos will never grasp.
Since I have no idea who or what a Sepo is, I cannot comment further except to say that it is perfectly valid to express an opinion about a car on this forum without this sort of abusive comment coming back.
M
Nice gearbox though, better the SLs when used in manual mode and certainly exclusive, got far more looks from other people than the SL which looks from the front just like any other Mercedes at first glance and the SL's need for the trunk lid, rear window and top roof section to be pretty much the same length imposes limits all of its own.
The Bentley Continental's success is one of life's great mysteries to me...
That said, I'm not convinced the SL65 feels special enough for the price. There's only one car I'd consider to replace the SL55 and that's a Ferrari F599 Fiorano.




It's a sports car,seats are terriffic and the ride is maybe stiffer then typical GT but not uncomfortable(even on "smooth" Chicago streets)
Seats are indeed aggresively bolstered but the car is a sport rather then cruise oriented.
I love it and I'll miss it when trade it in late Summer.

All in all it is a matter of taste. But the thing that cought me off guard was that the appearance and image of the DB9 promised me something a bit different than it delivered. But you can also blame my (apparently unfounded) expectations of course
It's a sports car,seats are terriffic and the ride is maybe stiffer then typical GT but not uncomfortable(even on "smooth" Chicago streets)
Seats are indeed aggresively bolstered but the car is a sport rather then cruise oriented.
I love it and I'll miss it when trade it in late Summer.
I'm shocked by how many here have driven this car and been dissapointed. To me this is the sexiest car made right now, but I've never had the pleasure of driving one.
Of course the GT's success is a mystery to you.
You are a Sepo, look at what you export: Stupid RAP music and all the propoganda associated with it.
Class is not something that you can buy, it has to be appreciated. Something you Sepos will never grasp.
Since I have no idea who or what a Sepo is, I cannot comment further except to say that it is perfectly valid to express an opinion about a car on this forum without this sort of abusive comment coming back.
According to urbandictionary.com, Sepo is a derogatory term for American. I had never heard it before, but then again I don't recognize most of the acronyms and slang that are used in this forum.
I guess athlon can't comprehend that a Brit cannot appreciate the Bentley Continental and chose to lash out in this manner.
Perhaps we could give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he was drunk when he posted, because I can't imagine that he meant to denigrate all of the Americans on the forum or to suggest that a Brit is incapable of having an independent point of view.
It's a sports car,seats are terriffic and the ride is maybe stiffer then typical GT but not uncomfortable(even on "smooth" Chicago streets)
Seats are indeed aggresively bolstered but the car is a sport rather then cruise oriented.
I love it and I'll miss it when trade it in late Summer.
Dynamically, has mysterious traction issues on relatively gentle launch on dry pavement; steering feel is solid, but not P/F-like; mid-range torque for the fairly relevant (at least in CA) 60-100MPH accel is fairly tepid vs those accustomed to 55/65 torque; brake pedal feel is fairly weak vs P/F; handling is solid, not great for a 4000lb GT coupe (much weaker than the 4600lb SL65 or 4300lb 612 in handling).....
To me, DB9 was the epitome of a conglomerate discount....a weak GT car, given its cheap interior finishes, poor interior ergonomics and middling straight-line torque...and a weak sportscar, w/o the brilliant software/hardware steering/chassis/brake tech tricks that 65/612 have successfully used to hide their excess weight.....
DB9, w/its great exterior looks, impressive exhaust note and relative rarity, does make for a great cars-as-costume jewelry car.....
Dynamically, has mysterious traction issues on relatively gentle launch on dry pavement; steering feel is solid, but not P/F-like; mid-range torque for the fairly relevant (at least in CA) 60-100MPH accel is fairly tepid vs those accustomed to 55/65 torque; brake pedal feel is fairly weak vs P/F; handling is solid, not great for a 4000lb GT coupe (much weaker than the 4600lb SL65 or 4300lb 612 in handling).....
To me, DB9 was the epitome of a conglomerate discount....a weak GT car, given its cheap interior finishes, poor interior ergonomics and middling straight-line torque...and a weak sportscar, w/o the brilliant software/hardware steering/chassis/brake tech tricks that 65/612 have successfully used to hide their excess weight.....
DB9, w/its great exterior looks, impressive exhaust note and relative rarity, does make for a great cars-as-costume jewelry car.....





