SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: 0 to 155mph what beats an sl65?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-12-2006, 12:55 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Derelique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Fran, CA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLK55 AMG
0 to 155mph what beats an sl65?

straight line doing 0 to 155mph what will beat the sl65???

obvious ones:

enzo

veyron

s7

slr

carrera gt

koenigsegg

Any other stock cars?
Old 09-12-2006, 10:11 PM
  #2  
Member
 
terrence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 Porsche Carrera GTS, 2009 BMW 750Li, 2011 Ferrari 458, 2011 SLS AMG, 2012 C63 AMG BS
Not sure Carrera GT would beat it. Ford GT?
Old 09-13-2006, 12:57 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Well, a Carrera GT would definitely beat it (provided driver wasn't comatose). The Ford GT would probably also beat it. The only published 0-150mph time for SL65 was 20.5 seconds under very hot conditions. However, Car & Driver tested a previous SL65 to a much faster acceleration times but only up to 130mph (13.4 sec). I imagine under optimal conditions that would translate into around 17-18 seconds 0-150 (I know you were asking about 0-155mph limiter but close enough). The Ford GT has run 16.9 to 19.1 (the higher time in the same heat the SL65 ran in). The C6 Corvette Z06 has run 0-150 in as fast as 17.7 sec. The new 997 TT ran 19.1 sec. For additional perspective, the BMW M6 has been tested at 19.5 sec 0-150. The new Ferrari 599GTB also is said to run 0-150 in 15.3 sec. A properly running Ferrari 430 may also be as fast as the SL65 0-150, it was tested 0-130mph in 13.0 (not sure it could hold off the SL65's huge hp advantage the remaining 25mph).

Tom
Old 09-13-2006, 09:06 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HLG600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,795
Received 238 Likes on 184 Posts
R230 SL63 | W220 S55
It's really a different animal compared to the CGT or the Ford GT. The SL65 will be a dangerous opponent to the F430 and such cars in that class in highway tag. Due to tremendous midrange power it will pull nicely from a roll all the way to top end. That's what these cars are designed to do, perform at high speeds in comfort on the motorway.
Old 09-15-2006, 09:02 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by HLG600
It's really a different animal compared to the CGT or the Ford GT. The SL65 will be a dangerous opponent to the F430 and such cars in that class in highway tag. Due to tremendous midrange power it will pull nicely from a roll all the way to top end. That's what these cars are designed to do, perform at high speeds in comfort on the motorway.
That's a good point. SL65 will lose ground from launch on cars like the 430 and especially the 997TT, but accelerating from 100-150 they won't be able to match AMG's flagship. It would be intersting to see how the SLR faired at those speeds too, though it still probably have the edge. The new 722 version certainly would. There was a businessman driving a black SLR downtown today next to me at the lights. Nice machine but if you don't track then the 65 probably makes more sense.

BTW, Koenigsegg is extremely quick but, from tests I've seen, would probably break down before it reached triple figures.
Old 09-16-2006, 12:55 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
BiTurboAmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL65 AMG
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
That's a good point. SL65 will lose ground from launch on cars like the 430 and especially the 997TT, but accelerating from 100-150 they won't be able to match AMG's flagship. It would be intersting to see how the SLR faired at those speeds too, though it still probably have the edge. The new 722 version certainly would. There was a businessman driving a black SLR downtown today next to me at the lights. Nice machine but if you don't track then the 65 probably makes more sense.

BTW, Koenigsegg is extremely quick but, from tests I've seen, would probably break down before it reached triple figures.
There is a video of an slr racing a white sl65 and the slr pulls a car or two and as the speeds get higher the sl65 comes up fast and passes. I think its on street fire or you tube.
Old 09-16-2006, 02:06 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by 06E55
There is a video of an slr racing a white sl65 and the slr pulls a car or two and as the speeds get higher the sl65 comes up fast and passes. I think its on street fire or you tube.
Interesting. I'll try and find it. If the 65 is stock, which is most likely, then it really does prove that the SL65 has got to be one of THE best second hand buys on the market. The money they lose after a year is not reflective of the car's performance or dual coupe/convertible nature.
Old 09-16-2006, 02:36 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Mrdredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...6807cae883.htm
Old 09-16-2006, 04:40 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Zlicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hooptie
Cars that would beat the SL65 from 0-150:

Veyron ~ 1.2 million
Saleen S7 TT ~500K
Mclaren F1 ~ 1 million
Enzo ~ 650K
Ferrari 599 ~ 300K, i think
CGT ~ 400K
FGT ~ 150K
C6 Z06 ~ 70K

FGT: 16.9
C6 Z06: 17.5 (Motor Trend)

Not sure about the rest, but I am sure they all have better and more spectacular times than the FGT and Z06.

The Z06 pulls VERY hard to 162, but will fallshort once shifted into 5th gear at 162 mph

I believe

Last edited by Zlicious; 09-16-2006 at 04:43 AM.
Old 09-16-2006, 05:58 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
whats the time for sl65 0-300km/h or 180 mph?
Old 09-16-2006, 10:01 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Old 09-18-2006, 09:18 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
Scruffyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, ML500, GT3 RS, 997C2S
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter

BTW, Koenigsegg is extremely quick but, from tests I've seen, would probably break down before it reached triple figures.
Or crash into the tire wall.
It's still a nice looking car.
Old 09-21-2006, 12:15 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
CLKBSVegas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vegas-Baby
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a Black
road and track and a web page have some #s

I think R&T did a spread sheet on similar numbers last month? I also found a web page from a Euro mag that did a similar spread. You guys hit most of the cars, but don't forget about the Lambo G...I rememmber it on the list too.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: 0 to 155mph what beats an sl65?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.