SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL600 question
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
SL600 question
I realize this is a bit off-topic considering it's not a 55 or 65, but to heck with it, the 600 forum is so lame. Anyhow... considering a SL600 instead of the E55... anyone know some 1/4 mile times?
I just want to make sure I upgrade to a faster car, not go to a slower car.
So, any times? Thanks in advance.
I just want to make sure I upgrade to a faster car, not go to a slower car.
So, any times? Thanks in advance.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 ML63 Silver Dead at 85k, 14 RS5, 05 SL600
Stock I would love to know the answer as well. I will try to take mine to the track next spring. ECU tuned I believe it can break into the very high 11's. Not bad for stock rubber. If the ML63 is a 13.1 sec quarter then the SL600 is considerably better than 13.1 My estimate would be mid 12's stock based upon the seat of the pants comparison to the ML63. It isn't the 0-60 where it does the damage but rather the 60-120mph. Sounds like there are good tunes out there for 2k.
If you do try a 600 I strongly suggest putting the 19" wheels off the 55/65 on it. It handles like a totally different car with P zero Rosso 19" than the stock Michelin Pilot Sport 18". If I was doing it again I would look hard at the 65.
If you do try a 600 I strongly suggest putting the 19" wheels off the 55/65 on it. It handles like a totally different car with P zero Rosso 19" than the stock Michelin Pilot Sport 18". If I was doing it again I would look hard at the 65.
Last edited by kokanee; 09-24-2007 at 06:34 PM.
#3
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My ex-cars: 03 E55,04 C32, 05 C55 ,03 E320
I am thinking and in the process of negotiations for an SL600 too...
I test drove it...compared to our E55's...it does feel faster high end ..also on the highway
I test drove it...compared to our E55's...it does feel faster high end ..also on the highway
#4
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL55 AMG, M5 E60, 2002 S55 AMG, Range Rover Sport Supercharged,
SL600: V-12 Biturbo 510 horses at 612 ft lb torque.
E55: 469 horses, 516 ft lb torque. Think about it.
More torque and power for the SL600 and can be more easily modded to over 600 horses with ease...
Stock for stock? Quarter Mile times vary for both cars. I'd say pretty close.
E55: 469 horses, 516 ft lb torque. Think about it.
More torque and power for the SL600 and can be more easily modded to over 600 horses with ease...
Stock for stock? Quarter Mile times vary for both cars. I'd say pretty close.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
We have a great ECU set up for the 600 cars....plus we can do some custom work for different situations.
So far, only happy clients. The 600 cars are very tunable. They do need a little help in the chassis department.
So far, only happy clients. The 600 cars are very tunable. They do need a little help in the chassis department.
Trending Topics
#8
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SL55 AMG, M5 E60, 2002 S55 AMG, Range Rover Sport Supercharged,
Nope. It's around 612 ft lb torque on the current 600s.
The older ones (2003 to 2006 or 07) have 590 ft lb torque.
The older ones (2003 to 2006 or 07) have 590 ft lb torque.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Here you go...
Self reported times here: http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz--SL600-Drag-Racing.html
The 11.90 result appears to be from the famous/infamous MotorTrend test: http://www.caranddriver.com/shortroa...enz-sl600.html
Popular Mechanics ran 12.48 in a stock SL600: http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...86.html?page=3
Self reported times here: http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz--SL600-Drag-Racing.html
The 11.90 result appears to be from the famous/infamous MotorTrend test: http://www.caranddriver.com/shortroa...enz-sl600.html
Popular Mechanics ran 12.48 in a stock SL600: http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...86.html?page=3
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
so my times
So my times in video are respectable. Biggest problem I run into is traction off the launch, but with street tires that is going to be a problem.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'd guess your SL600 is chip tuned. Yes? No?
I upgraded my rear tires from the stock PZero Rossos to Nitto NT555RIIs. Shorter life but they really stick, both at the track and on the open road.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
yes and your your mph shows the hp gain, that 121mph was a good run for florida heat, drop some 100 octane + and youll get another mph
#15
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
11.9 modded? Or stock, stephen?
If modded, then I think I'll pass up the SL600. I thought the 600 would do that stock...
I've clocked 11.9 in my E55 just on K&N and exhaust. Street tires, as well.
If modded, then I think I'll pass up the SL600. I thought the 600 would do that stock...
I've clocked 11.9 in my E55 just on K&N and exhaust. Street tires, as well.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
it is modded, im sure you ran an 11.99 which is fast, but i can guarantee u that with your above mods you didnt run 121mph
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 SL600, 2001 S500, 1996 SL320
Wow
WOW a decision to buy an R230 (SL600) or stay with a E55 based only on a 1/4 MILE time.
Two totally different cars to me.
Nothing against the E55, but the SL600 is so much more luxurious.
Price point is totally different too.
Two totally different cars to me.
Nothing against the E55, but the SL600 is so much more luxurious.
Price point is totally different too.
#19
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
In any case, I'm not basing my decision just on the 1/4 mile time alone. It's just one of the many factors. I believe tomorrow is the day, if I get it, expect pictures. It is beautiful in person, pictures do not do the car justice.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Exodus
No, you had 2mph on me.
Last edited by JAYCL600; 09-27-2007 at 09:19 AM.
#21
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none