SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL63 Spr08 US arrival?

Rumors are interior is all-new....though not clear if SL will have CL/S-caliber DistronicPlus/BrakeAssist/Parktronic interlinks....or latest Comand/stereo systems.....or whether SL gets a new CL/S-caliber braking system....

Am ordering an early SL63 030 (awaiting prob later Blk Series)...but have ambivalent views re: SL......as much as I suspect its steering/chassis will be sharper than CL63's....not sure if brakes will be all-new/advcd ('07 SL65 had simply awful brake pedal feel, though excellent stopping dists/fade resistance).....and hate crash risks of even retractable hardtop convertibles (prefer Blk Series' rumored fixed cf roof struc).....suspect passive safety of CL63 is far greater esp if rear-ended on high-speed fwys...or if facing frontal collision in mtn twisties....a 4600lb rigid coupe w/likely stronger roof struc, w/more ample crumple zones and higher ride ht (am enough of a safety fanatic to always drive w/roof and windows closed, though I much enjoy listening to the brilliant exhaust note of 63, esp in mtn twisties).....excellent choices debating btwn two of world's greatest cars.....

Last edited by WSH; Dec 17, 2007 at 11:45 PM.
heavier SL with same amount of lower torque then the 55K, i don't think i will be too happy with that

and then i bet you the 63TT engine comes out 1 year after this SL63 comes out, so early adopters will be screwed
heavier SL with same amount of lower torque then the 55K, i don't think i will be too happy with that

and then i bet you the 63TT engine comes out 1 year after this SL63 comes out, so early adopters will be screwed

M
Ted
Last edited by Ted Baldwin; Dec 18, 2007 at 06:35 PM.
Ted
Ted
Trending Topics
Ted
News flash Ted, the next SL is at least 2-3 years off. You had better believe that Mercedes didn't go through all this trouble of facelifting the R230 to replace it so soon.
M
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
News flash Ted, the next SL is at least 2-3 years off. You had better believe that Mercedes didn't go through all this trouble of facelifting the R230 to replace it so soon.
M
News flash Ted, the next SL is at least 2-3 years off. You had better believe that Mercedes didn't go through all this trouble of facelifting the R230 to replace it so soon.
M
..........You are right and wrong. I think we are getting a bit loose with the HP numbers. I have never expected there to be an NA SL63 or G63 because the HP and torque numbers of the 507Hp and 465Lbft of torque will be a step backwards for these very heavy cars. To the extent that there will be NA SL63 afterall, means that I was partially wrong. If the NA SL63 gets beefed up to over 540HP as others are suggesting, it essentially addresses the problem I was raising. But I don't expect you to acknowledge it. I have argued with you before, and there will be no end to this. So claim victory, so it will stop.
..........As far as the new SL being 2-3 years away; Again we are being a bit loose with the numbers. If the replacement for the SL comes out 2 years from now as you have stated, then that will be only one year after the NA SL63. Mercees has done this before. Stuffing the ttv12 into the CL65 and then replacing the body style one year later. Now you can pick up a W215 CL65 for $60K. I won't be too quick to dismiss this concern. I know you have an issue with me, but I'm not the only one that has expressed it. One possible scenario that may make sense is the one already pointed out by another forum member. That is; MB will beef up the HP and torque in the NA SL63 to address the concerns I and others have raised. Then introduce the TTV8 a year or so later as a replacement for the 65's. There may not be the need in the future for the current V12TT if the V8TT can be made to be just as powerful or even more powerful. This will save the buyers of the beefed up NA SL63 from suffering the same fate as the buyers of the W215 CL65. You won't agree with anything I've said, but it is all good.
Ted
..........As far as the new SL being 2-3 years away; Again we are being a bit loose with the numbers. If the replacement for the SL comes out 2 years from now as you have stated, then that will be only one year after the NA SL63. Mercees has done this before. Stuffing the ttv12 into the CL65 and then replacing the body style one year later. Now you can pick up a W215 CL65 for $60K. I won't be too quick to dismiss this concern. I know you have an issue with me, but I'm not the only one that has expressed it. One possible scenario that may make sense is the one already pointed out by another forum member. That is; MB will beef up the HP and torque in the NA SL63 to address the concerns I and others have raised. Then introduce the TTV8 a year or so later as a replacement for the 65's. There may not be the need in the future for the current V12TT if the V8TT can be made to be just as powerful or even more powerful. This will save the buyers of the beefed up NA SL63 from suffering the same fate as the buyers of the W215 CL65. You won't agree with anything I've said, but it is all good.
Ted
For the record I think there will be a new SL for the 2011 model year here in the U.S. so all that other stuff you're saying may be right about what they'll do with engine wise then, but again that doesn't have anything to do with what we were discussing. Period.
Lastly even if they do come out with a SL63 with 540 or so hp, the torque will never match or even come close to mathing the old 5.5L SC V8 so again what is the point of bringing that up?
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Dec 19, 2007 at 07:38 AM.
..........As far as the new SL being 2-3 years away; Again we are being a bit loose with the numbers. If the replacement for the SL comes out 2 years from now as you have stated, then that will be only one year after the NA SL63. Mercees has done this before. Stuffing the ttv12 into the CL65 and then replacing the body style one year later. Now you can pick up a W215 CL65 for $60K. I won't be too quick to dismiss this concern. I know you have an issue with me, but I'm not the only one that has expressed it. One possible scenario that may make sense is the one already pointed out by another forum member. That is; MB will beef up the HP and torque in the NA SL63 to address the concerns I and others have raised. Then introduce the TTV8 a year or so later as a replacement for the 65's. There may not be the need in the future for the current V12TT if the V8TT can be made to be just as powerful or even more powerful. This will save the buyers of the beefed up NA SL63 from suffering the same fate as the buyers of the W215 CL65. You won't agree with anything I've said, but it is all good.
Ted
I for one agree with Ted. After the beating I took on the Sl65 I wouldn't touch a first Gen NA SL63. I would however buy a low mile SL65 for 90k that to me is a better car anyway and let the latest and greatest tank in value before touching one again.
M
M
M
Someday there will be an updated 12 cylinder engine, and AMG will modify it as well. I don't see why a twin turbo V-8 would sit atop the Benz lineup. Maybe there will be a turbo 63, but it will probably be part of a "Black" series and will also have the 5-speed transmission.
M
M
M




That's exactly what Ferrari is working on right now,Hybrid technology to increase performance ,not fuel efficiency as a main objective.
If it works,MB and others will just follow suit.
M
M

AMG has hinted they may turbo/SC the 63 motor; and have heard rumors new V12 motor is <12mos away.....suspect AMG is figuring out how to sell fast-depreciating AMG SL's, esp when Ferrari is about to launch a $200Kish retractable hardtop in CY08.....let's face it, perhaps 90%+ of buyers are buying a brand/image, not hp/tq; safety; chassis, etc.....reality is most would be most happy w/a Ferrari SUV w/XXL wheels/tints/loud exhaust/XXL cupholders (and trays for their fast-food dinners) and rear-seat entmt sys for their rugrats and mutts....



