SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL55 or SL65?
I’m going to buy SL 65 2005. Any experience in exploitation? I’m interested in transmission and other features of operation.WHat is more reliable sl55 or sl65?
Thanks for you attention, i hope you help me
PS Excuse if I have made mistakes, I am simple only I raise the level )))
Last edited by Andrian001; May 16, 2008 at 05:09 AM.
I’m going to buy SL 65 2005. Any experience in exploitation? I’m interested in transmission and other features of operation.WHat is more reliable sl55 or sl65?
Thanks for you attention, i hope you help me
PS Excuse if I have made mistakes, I am simple only I raise the level )))
I’m going to buy SL 65 2005. Any experience in exploitation? I’m interested in transmission and other features of operation.WHat is more reliable sl55 or sl65?
Thanks for you attention, i hope you help me
PS Excuse if I have made mistakes, I am simple only I raise the level )))
Trending Topics
It is faster but does lack some of the exhaust note of the SL55.
It does have a turbo lag that takes getting used to.
V12`s are always more maintenence. More Cylinders.
If you want just raw HP. Go for the SL65.
Both have the 5 speed Trans.
My SL55 has the performance package and I have had it 2 years.
Its been flawless so far and even survived a rear end hit with minimal
damage.
Its a tough world when you have to decide between these 2 cars.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I agree with you though, both are great cars.
Would I go back to the SL55? No way... I would miss the insane power, respectable performance and exclusivity of the 65.
Would I go back to the SL55? No way... I would miss the insane power, respectable performance and exclusivity of the 65.
I have an SL55 and have driven a number of 65s and for all the power of the 65, I still think I like the 55 better. It is a better all around package. Whereas
the 65 seems to be overwhelmed by the engine. But they are both great cars, and you will be happy with whichever you choose.







