SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: Ferrari California
Last edited by SL%%; Jun 1, 2008 at 11:18 PM.

F's have rather laughably primitive/inept safety strucs/engineering (even the 4300+lb 612 still lacks side/head airbags, as does the allegedly latest-tech Scud
), so would suspect F CA will have vastly inferior risk-adjusted perf vs any SL63 030...

If it had a BMW, etc badge it would have moderate sales success, but the horsey will have it selling all they can make, and push Ferrari production even further.
It really isn't a price point competition for the SL63, as it is going to cost $~$240K. It was originally contrived as an 'entry' level car, but they decided against that.
Trending Topics
it does not look as aggressive as 430 or 599... in other words, it does not look ferrari...
i would wait for 430 successor .. probably would look much better.. and the hard top is really not doing much for me anyway...
my SL has done top down for less than 5 times in 3 years.. all happened during the first 3 months...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
This one just doesn't light my fire.
But, a Scuderia 430, now that's a different story. Immediately fell in love with the looks of that car when I saw it introduced at Frankfurt, last year.
Just wished I could afford it!
JDB
This one just doesn't light my fire.
But, a Scuderia 430, now that's a different story. Immediately fell in love with the looks of that car when I saw it introduced at Frankfurt, last year.
Just wished I could afford it!
JDB
Try sticking a folding hardtop on it. Good luck.
I kind of like the California. Sure it's no 430 or Aston, but it looks pretty good to my eye. It has a little Maserati Granturismo DNA.
Last edited by JackStraw; Jun 4, 2008 at 12:08 PM.







