SL55 AMG, SL63 AMG, SL65 AMG (R230) 2002 - 2011 (2003 US for SL55 and 2004 for the SL65)

SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 AMG Forever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-02-2014, 12:41 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
SL65 AMG Forever

It's funny, everyone at some time wants a SL65, why I ask myself. Now I am back in a 65 I am happy again, owning the top SL also has nothing to
do with money, I have just changed an almost new SL63 for a 10 year old
SL65. I just love the shape, the interior everything, I have even gone off the
idea of fitting a wide body kit.

Here's to the SL65 an amazing car.
Old 06-03-2014, 07:48 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Maverick1975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Vath ML63 Brabus C63 SL63 CLK63BS C63BS
Don't you miss the throttle blipping?
Old 06-03-2014, 09:04 AM
  #3  
Member
 
pjdough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1999 E55, 2005 SL65
Amen brother! I've had straight 4s and 6s, V6s and V8s (incl AMG)...and an AMG V12 (TT). There's absolutely no comparision mechanically. Moreover, my SL65 has been extremely reliable with very few mechanical issues (those I've had, have been more related to the retractable roof (although nothing major)).

Cruising with the top down, my pretty blonde girlfriend riding shotgun, and the Meisterschaft exhausts growling is what I live for. Eat your heart out BMW, Porsche, Vette, Aston Martin, Ferrari, etc. owners...there just isn't anything out there to match THE luxury 2-seat convertable of our era.

Oh, and chirping the rears at 80+ while pegged to your seat like a Shuttle Astronaut blasting off from Kennedy Space Center gives me something my girlfriend really appreciates! As an ole buddy of mine would say, "makes me harder than chinese arithmetic!"

Enjoy!
Old 06-03-2014, 11:36 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Yes, Yes, Yes, you said it, however I am not privy to the Blonde
Old 06-03-2014, 06:52 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Viper98912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 2,977
Received 100 Likes on 83 Posts
Current: C217 V12TT AMG Previously: C55 AMG, SL65 AMG
I need one of these dammit.
Old 06-03-2014, 10:13 PM
  #6  
Member
 
Jan T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sl65, SL600 RENNtech, Verde Ithaca LP640, 3 highly modified Panteras, Maserati Biturbo, 300D turtle
Ha ha yes, biggest bang for the buck out there...now RENNtech it and you will really enjoy it (but ware some diapers on the first ride).
Old 06-04-2014, 09:01 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Yes, Yes , just had her re mapped and K&N filters installed.

Can you die from happiness
Old 06-04-2014, 09:14 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
sgaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'06 E500, '99 ML430 and '07 SL65
Originally Posted by sound 8
Yes, Yes , just had her re mapped and K&N filters installed.

Can you die from happiness
Well, before you die (or throw more money away on filters) you might want to read this http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/kn-vs-oem-filter.html. K&N are properly the worst thing you can do for your car. A complete waste of money and on top of that, they need regular cleaning...and let us be honest, it is not likely to happen
Old 06-04-2014, 11:59 AM
  #9  
Member
 
rune solem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
SL 55 and a GT 3000 vr4 Here's my car: http://home.online.no/~ludvs/index.cfm
Congratulations coming back to the R230 sound 8!

Have a very nice summer in your new and gorgeous lookin' ride.
Old 06-04-2014, 01:30 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Thanks rune,
I'm loving it, forgot how much better looking she is compared with the 231.
Old 06-04-2014, 01:51 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by sgaar
Well, before you die (or throw more money away on filters) you might want to read this http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/kn-vs-oem-filter.html. K&N are properly the worst thing you can do for your car. A complete waste of money and on top of that, they need regular cleaning...and let us be honest, it is not likely to happen
My god who would think someone would do a test as complex as this for an
AIR FILTER
Basically it says all air filters are the same, also it seems everyone and his
dog uses K&N, people don't buy them from there dirt stopping ability, they
are bought for one reason...extra power.
What they should have done is stick a car on a Dyno and measure the BHP
on each filter, just in case there is another aspect not taken into consideration with these filters. Personally once re mapped it's got to have
a K&N, maybe it's better than a stock filter whatever make it is.
Old 06-04-2014, 02:23 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
you'll be happy for like 9 months before you start whining about something and switch again.
Old 06-04-2014, 02:25 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by sound 8
My god who would think someone would do a test as complex as this for an
AIR FILTER
Basically it says all air filters are the same, also it seems everyone and his
dog uses K&N, people don't buy them from there dirt stopping ability, they
are bought for one reason...extra power.
What they should have done is stick a car on a Dyno and measure the BHP
on each filter, just in case there is another aspect not taken into consideration with these filters. Personally once re mapped it's got to have
a K&N, maybe it's better than a stock filter whatever make it is.
maybe you should actually read the test instead of showing your ignorance. Any supposed power gain would fall well under dyno variation
Old 06-04-2014, 02:53 PM
  #14  
Member
 
pjdough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1999 E55, 2005 SL65
And...how did we get from the virtues of the SL65 to insulting language over swapping air filters. JC...if you don't have something constructive / complementary to say...save us from the agony of reading BS.

Sound 8 - Welcome back and good luck with the car! Enjoy...
Old 06-04-2014, 03:02 PM
  #15  
Member
 
sl65_rockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston/Chicago
Posts: 209
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
SL65
Amen. More positive vibes...less neg
Old 06-04-2014, 04:23 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
sgaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'06 E500, '99 ML430 and '07 SL65
The thing about air filters and K&N in particular, is the you cannot just assume that installing an particular air filter will increase the HP in a given car. In some case it will increase the HP (with some negative effects). With cars where they have a non-optimal construction, size and/or location, it could be a help. K&N air filters generally have a larger surface which will naturally increase the flow across the filter compared to the stock filter. If you on top of that move the intake or filter to the front and insulate it from the rest of the engine compartment so it can scoop up colder air, it would also be a help.

If you look at the construction of the SL air intake and the location, you already have a 'cold air' intake on each side of the radiator. The size of the filters is already close to optimal so the gain from adding K&N filters to an SL65 is minimal at best.

With K&N too much dirt gets through them, they don’t add any power, and owners end up going to the service department regarding drivability problems stemming from the oil on a K&N getting into the MAF system.

Another interesting observation is that nobody, I mean NOBODY, offers K&N air filters as the stock filter. It doesn't matter if we are looking at a high performance $500.000 Lamborghini or Ferrari, or if we look at a Smart car. Not for a second do I believe it comes down to cost when we are looking at Lamborghini or Ferrari....or SL65's for that matter.

But again, each to his or her own and if you feel that a K&N adds something to your car, then you should definitely install them. Happy driving....
Old 06-04-2014, 04:26 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
sgaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina, US
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'06 E500, '99 ML430 and '07 SL65
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
maybe you should actually read the test instead of showing your ignorance. Any supposed power gain would fall well under dyno variation
That is not always true. It greatly depends one the construction and placement of the stock filter. Assuming that this: http://www.lsxtv.com/tech-stories/en...intake-options is true, it proves my point.

It is important to keep in mind what the baseline is and what you do to the car. Simply swapping the filter is not always the solution.
Old 06-04-2014, 04:41 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Jan T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Sl65, SL600 RENNtech, Verde Ithaca LP640, 3 highly modified Panteras, Maserati Biturbo, 300D turtle
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
you'll be happy for like 9 months before you start whining about something and switch again.
Yeah, I go through the same analogy with my Maserati Biturbo...love it when it works, hate it when it doesn't. But with the SL65 with RENNtech, the upside is worth any punishment in maintenance costs (none for me "yet").
Old 06-04-2014, 04:57 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by sgaar
That is not always true. It greatly depends one the construction and placement of the stock filter. Assuming that this: http://www.lsxtv.com/tech-stories/en...intake-options is true, it proves my point.

It is important to keep in mind what the baseline is and what you do to the car. Simply swapping the filter is not always the solution.
was it a clean stock filter? was the k&n brand new? When brand new, the k&n may flow better, but give it a few thousand miles and that miraculous filter will now flow less than stock. Not to mention the oiling of the filter, and the higher silicia in your used oil analysis.

interesting also that only the stock dyno chart crosses at 5250rpm.
Keep in mind also that these magazines and websites are sponsored and have been known to do some dyno trickery (no fan for stock, add fan for aftermarket, different vehicle temps, etc) to make the numbers say what they want.
Old 06-04-2014, 10:02 PM
  #20  
alx
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,268
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts
Originally Posted by sound 8
It's funny, everyone at some time wants a SL65, why I ask myself. Now I am back in a 65 I am happy again, owning the top SL also has nothing to
do with money, I have just changed an almost new SL63 for a 10 year old
SL65. I just love the shape, the interior everything, I have even gone off the
idea of fitting a wide body kit.

Here's to the SL65 an amazing car.
Right?
Old 06-05-2014, 10:05 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by alx
Right?
Absolutely
Old 06-05-2014, 10:06 AM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
you'll be happy for like 9 months before you start whining about something and switch again.
Car dealers need to make money,, sometimes !
Old 06-05-2014, 10:23 AM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Originally Posted by Quadcammer
maybe you should actually read the test instead of showing your ignorance. Any supposed power gain would fall well under dyno variation
You my friend are the ignorant one

I did read it, and then decided I just wasted time when I could have been
polishing my 65

It was a big complex test that proves nothing. Sure if you put every filter
tested in your car I doubt you will feel the difference. We are dealing with
miniscule differences in engine power, and the average man just wants the
cheapest and probably wouldn't know if it added another 30 hp.
The test was akin to testing how fast grass grows....er no no that is more interesting. Just fit a K&N and imagine all that extra power, it works like
a lot of Kings new clothes items.
Now where's that polish, thanks guys for some great posts, even Quadcam.
Old 06-05-2014, 02:46 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
hpV12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Audi A4
Post some pics Sound 8, please. Would like to see color combo of your 65, and there really is nothing like the nuclear bomb V12TT under your right foot
Old 06-06-2014, 09:20 AM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
Look at the post.............what do you think............needs lowering though.
I kept my first 230 SL55 for 5 years, I never modified it, and it started to
get some problems so I sold it for the 2009 SL63.
Sometimes I wish I had kept it and done wheels, ecu, and more, might still
have it, didn't have that V12 feel so ultimately the 65 was always what I
would end up in. Do you know I have to look at her when I get up in the
night for a wee. out the window of course

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SL55/63/65/R230 AMG: SL65 AMG Forever



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM.