SLK/R171: Comparison of SLK350 to Boxster S
coz if you don't think Boxster are good enough then the SLK won't be much better
although SLK got comfy suspension but is still a really harsh ride compare to your current ML
Tell you some, forget everything, wake up tommorow and take SLK, except you consider 911 else forget it.
Hope this strong statement will help
Gud luck
I'm sure the S is faster, corners harder etc etc. For 99% of your driving the comfort of the SLK will come up trumps.
The Airscarf alone is worth the difference.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
BINGO! That's me. Kind of like "Fa55t sitting still".
http://www.slkworld.com/42898-post1.html
No such luck, mate. As -1- said, only the 280 can still be had with a manual transmission in the US.
The ride in the Boxster S is also harsher, even compared to the AMG sport package. There is more feedback through the steering wheel in the Boxster S (my wife described it as 'buzzing'). I didn't mind it as much.
The Boxster S handles better and corners great. The SLK isn't as good there. As much as I'd like to drive like this all the time, I don't. For the vast majority of my driving, the SLK does a fine job and is still a lot of fun.
The 350 has good low-end power compared to the 280. The AMG 55 is more than I need for 99% of my driving, and the extra gas required for the rest of the time isn't worth it for me.
I like the looks of the Boxster S, but the SLK is also a great looker (especially compared to the older SLK's which were fulgy IMHO). I don't like the looks of the Lexus. It looks the same going forwards and backwards, and it rides like a boat. I'm not a fan of BMW's, so we didn't take one for a ride. We tried the Jaguar XK too, but the ride was not sporty enough and seemed to weigh a lot more.
There you have it. 3 months of research and test drives and for us, the SLK350 won out.
Now if they would just enhance their GPS.



