MODERATORS....take the hint!
Well since this all started way back one in the W203 section. And it is stated that there is a drop off in W203 posts since the Kineda Incedent, then would I be wrong in assuming this thread should have stayed in the W203 section?
We also have members that want to post only to disrupt our forum and nothing more. Proof of that can be found by reading threads on mbklasse. In fact, the original post in this thread points to a great example. The poster asked a question about his signature, and even stated that they would be happy to change it if it violated the terms of use. When he was informed that it did, he went to the other forum and started the MBWORLD bashing thread. Here is his original thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...threadid=61439
Since then, we have been accused of trying to protect one sponsor over another, editing and deleting threads, letting certain members violate the TOU, while others are banned for doing so. The facts are, we are not protecting any of the sponsors, outside of the TOU. I do not work for ANY of them, so I have no reason for doing so, nor has anyone ever asked me to. If members violate the TOU, we will address that. However, we cannot review every single post on this forum, and we rely heavily on member input. Of course, when we hear of a member that is purposely planning to violate our terms, we will watch that member more closely. As for the editing and deleting; to my knowledge, there has been no post edited (unless you count merging it into one thread), or deleted since the original post by the member Rick.
Im sure you do have better things to do. I mean you have a business to run, I'm not going to go thru this you-hit-me-first tit for tat pansy bs with you. Your actions speak for itself...doesn't matter who from your admin panel did what, each individual from your panel is an equal representative of your company.
I am only 1 of many. I don't need to justify what I've said or beetch about it like some baby. Your actions further reinforce the points I have raised with my comments/remarks.
As for the acting like a child part, hey, you've gotta speak your audiences' lingo for them to understand? Civilized and professional manner...oh my, was that a joke? A professional would have stood by his sponsors, and laid down firm action against meaningless name-calling, insults, vulgarities etc...the post by CLKAL wasn't 1 page of bs, not 2 pages of bs, not 3 pages of bs BUT ****ING 20++ pages of it.
Where was your professionalism when you deleted/moved our threads without even displaying the <-- Moved icon? Or giving some form of notice...no instead you just removed it entirely, and dumped it all here. Don't be asking for my professionalism or courtesy when you give none, you don't have the right.
I don't feel a sense of achievement, but I do feel a sense of righteousness. I've done my part, you can insult me all you want, deny everything like you always do, it's your forum...as for how many members you'll have left, that is all up to you. I'm just the guy trying to shed some light to the subject for the general public, since you keep deleting and hiding my replies, and because pms and cordial requests don't seem to work with you...and blatant but substantiated remarks about your company seem to work and get up-to-the-minute responses.
Last edited by mbphreak; Feb 26, 2004 at 02:51 PM.
As for the acting like a child part, hey, you've gotta speak your audiences' lingo for them to understand? Civilized and professional manner...oh my, was that a joke? A professional would have stood by his sponsors, and laid down firm action against meaningless name-calling, insults, vulgarities etc...the post by CLKAL wasn't 1 page of bs, not 2 pages of bs, not 3 pages of bs BUT ****ING 20++ pages of it.
Where was your professionalism when you deleted/moved our threads without even displaying the <-- Moved icon? Or giving some form of notice...no instead you just removed it entirely, and dumped it all here. Don't be asking for my professionalism or courtesy when you give none, you don't have the right.
I find it funny that people who complain are usually those that only joined recently i.e. the last 6 months or so, or those that don't make a lot of posts on daily basis. Most of us that posts daily and have been here for a long time really doesn't care about this discussion.
How long have I been here? Where are my posts being made now? Are they worthless? Could you benefit from them?
And enough other long-termers are either not here or not participating as much. I never posted a lot here or anywhere, but typically my posts had substance.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Hmmm, you seem to care an awful lot about this one thread. A thread where you were participating in the name calling.....[/b]I'll say it again, there was NO thread edited or deleted. The MULTIPLE threads that were created (all in the wrong forums) were merged into the ONE thread in the correct forum. ALL the originators of the threads were advised that their threads had been merged.
You seem to want to spread a lot of Mis-information. None of your posts have been deleted or hidden. Your questions about your signature was handled in a professional way. You didn't like the answer, so you decided to go on this rant. [/B]
Any response on the 20+ page vendor bashing that wasn't locked moved or merged until now?
You don't care but you're posting in it...?
How long have I been here? Where are my posts being made now? Are they worthless? Could you benefit from them?
And enough other long-termers are either not here or not participating as much. I never posted a lot here or anywhere, but typically my posts had substance.
let this topic die already...
I think you should look where I got the "child naming calling part" it was a quote from your buddy Mr. Vanos. Did you fail English or are you some illiterate ****?
NOW that's name calling on my part and my first and only.
Don't even tell me my threads were not deleted when they were. WHERE IS THE "<== MOVED" INDICATOR TO THE THREADS?? WHY DIDN'T YOU DO THE SAME FOR THAT STUPID CLKAL THREAD? all you did was lock it, and only after I left that remark about Evosport. pfffttt, professional...professional at covering your own behinds.
Pffft, my sig? Well, if you pple could follow more closely to your stupid TOA, and not keep giving me mixed answers (MB BOB said it's not ok, then MACH430 said it's ok, then Vanos said it wasn't ok) maybe I wouldn't need to go on a rant.
Last edited by mbphreak; Feb 26, 2004 at 08:59 PM.
Pffft, my sig? Well, if you pple could follow more closely to your stupid TOA, and not keep giving me mixed answers (MB BOB said it's not ok, then MACH430 said it's ok, then Vanos said it wasn't ok) maybe I wouldn't need to go on a rant.
I've tried to stay out of this fray...
I said your siggy was not OK, if it included references off-site to commercial interests, such as mbklasse.com, to which Mr V agrees. To the extent that other moderators disagree with me... perhaps we are trying rather hard to allow you some lattitude of play, rather than go ballistic.
However, please don't take it as license to continue, as I respectfully disagree with the confrontational tact you have taken with it. While it's your right to express yourself, "fighting for your forum rights" in a virtual world simply makes no sense to me. You'd be better served walking into your back yard at night and baying at the moon.
Not to mention that there are no such things as forum rights. You have a right to life. You have a right to liberty. You have a right to your pursuit of happiness. But I am frankly tired of people purporting to assert their rights here. You do not have rights here, but instead you have privileges, only. My suggestion would be that everyone watch your privileges carefully, and try to be polite.
digital puke...
Any response on the 20+ page vendor bashing that wasn't locked moved or merged until now?
I'm not a moderator on that forum (W208) so I don't normally read those threads. I didn't even know about the thread in question until it was mentioned somewhere else. After reading through the whole thing, it was clear that there were some members that were out of control with their personal insults, so I decided to close the thread.
Now I'm not sure if anyone reported that thread to a moderator (since I'm not a moderator on that forum, I would not have been notified), but this would have been the first step a member should have taken. They could of also PM'd any moderator, or the admin too. If a sponsor feels that they are being treated on the forum unfairly, then they should take that up with the administrator.
WHAT? ANOTHER PRE-MENSTRUAL RELATED CHANGE TO YOUR TOA? Give me your excuse, I can't wait to here your next lame one. Don't tell me you're not allowing mine and allowing benzworld.org, cardomain.com, sounddomain.com, europrojecktz.com etc etc.
You take off mine I want to see you enforce your TOA on all the other peeps *in the 100s* with those .com references!
Last edited by mbphreak; Feb 27, 2004 at 04:24 AM.
Your signature clearly links to a competing site, which I, MB-Bob, Mr. Vanos, and who knows how many other moderators, have told you time and time again is not acceptable. The fact that you edited your signature today (of course clearly forgot to mention that in your outburst) would make any previous approval (which there are none) futile.
If you can not comprehend this, then I do not know what to tell you. You know what is acceptable and what is not. From your first post on this forum, you have done nothing but attempt to stir up trouble. It wasn't funny when you were attacking MBenzNL, and it is not funny now. Surely you can find something to fill the void that drives you to spend hours each day disrupting our forum.
This is a private forum, which you are allowed to participate in. 13,000 other members can respect these rules, why can't you? You wrote that you already have a new place. Maybe you should stay there.
I want to see all the benzworld.org, cardomain.com, sounddomain.com, europrojektz.com sigs removed as well, as a show of your claimed "unbias enforcement of TOA."
Better get on it boy, u have at least a few hundred to go through. Need my help to give you a jump start?
Don't bring Steve into this, he knows I was messing with him and it's water under the bridge.
First, yes, you did change your signature. While the picture remained the same, your text changed. To name one of the changes, it went from cklasse.com to www.cklasse.com. While you may count that as being exactly the same, it clearly is not, and thus you have been caught in the lie.
To this date, not one private message has ever been viewed without the direct consent of all parties involved. Give it a rest, seriously. If you can't figure out how to send a private message properly, maybe you should ask. The only way to even access your private messages would be to log in as you. Since we do not know your password, this would mean that it would be necessary to change your password to one that we could use to log in, thus leaving you unable to log on. But wait, you did!

You accuse us of being so overbearing on you, yet you have violated multiple rules and not been banned. You personally post on other forums about your goals to disrupt the daily activities on MBWorld. I for one am done playing your games. You don't have to like our rules, you even don't have to agree with our rules, but if you can't abide by our rules than you need to leave.




Oh geez, isn't this **** ever gonna end?
Pluck my eyeballs out and feed 'em to the dog!
C'mon people. It's just the way it is.
It's their forum, their money.
God if it was me and I had to put up with this crap (as an owner), I'd put an M80 in the server and never look back.
I'm not saying anything about who's right and wrong.
In fact I don't agree with alot of things here as of late.
But I'm SICK of discussing it.
Fact is nothing is private in the internet unless you use encryption.
Move on.
Last edited by C230 Sport Coup; Feb 27, 2004 at 05:23 AM.
I said your siggy was not OK, if it included references off-site to commercial interests, such as mbklasse.com, to which Mr V agrees.
A question for my own edification. This isn't meant to cause distress.
1. Are sites such as MBKlasse.com and BenzForum.com considered commercial interests because they have their own sponsors or simply because they are another benz website? I think a clarification might be useful.
2. On a few occassions, I've linked the MacNeil website when folks have asked about their weatherflectors. I have no affiliation with them other than being a customer. Also, I've never noted them to be a sponsor on any benz forum. As MacNeil is obviously an online business, was providing those links wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Mark
In the year or so that I've been on this site, I have only seen a couple controversial things come up, but they all appear to come from the c-class forums. I saw the littany of shill/spam/commerical posts by that guy that recently got banned, and IMO it was justified because he was clearly trying to use his pictures to solicit sales. I know because he offered to sell me stuff when I PM'd him. So to me, alot of the rants about the ban are either based on misinformation or outright ignorance. IMO the mods need to cull the herd and move on.
NO ACCESS TO MY ACCOUNT UNLESS U LOG IN w/ MY PASS?? BULL, HOW DID YOU REMOVE MY SIG THEN? CAUGHT IN ANOTHER LIE. Dropped your pants and said alakazam?
Hey man, I kindly ask you to better enforce your TOA on those other .org .coms and .nets if you plan to be such a by-the-toa standup guy you claim to be. Seriously...





