Project: Aiming for the fastest W210 E55
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Land of Blondes...
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2001: Supercharged E55 AMG
Project: Aiming for the fastest W210 E55
Ok, here is the meal
--> 11.863/195,54 Km/h (Fastest W210 this far, Jim Cannon's)
And here is the deal -->![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
:JE custom made Pistons
:New steel bore
:CR 9,0:1
:Ported and polished heads
:Ported S/C
:465cc Injectors
:Bigger fuel pump
:Modded MAF with larger house
:Larger throttle body
:Smaller S/C pulley and larger crank pulley
:Unique mapped ECU tune
:Boost will be between 0,8-1,2 bar (12-17 Psi)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03345.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03347.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03346.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03348.jpg)
Ported S/C inlet & outlet
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03355.jpg)
Ooh, and you may ask WHY all these mods and money on a W210 instead of buying a W211
Answer = LOVE for the E55 W210
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
And here is the deal -->
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
:JE custom made Pistons
:New steel bore
:CR 9,0:1
:Ported and polished heads
:Ported S/C
:465cc Injectors
:Bigger fuel pump
:Modded MAF with larger house
:Larger throttle body
:Smaller S/C pulley and larger crank pulley
:Unique mapped ECU tune
:Boost will be between 0,8-1,2 bar (12-17 Psi)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03345.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03347.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03346.jpg)
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03348.jpg)
Ported S/C inlet & outlet
![](http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y157/abalonee/DSC03355.jpg)
Ooh, and you may ask WHY all these mods and money on a W210 instead of buying a W211
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
Answer = LOVE for the E55 W210
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Is this still the quickest W210? There was some talk floating around the forum about a 10.45 E55 and Ted Baldwin's times were pretty close to Jim Cannon before Ted increased his boost. Haven't heard what he has run since.
Still your car should be a beast when done regardless.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
06 CLS55 Renntech stage 5, 04 CL600 ( will miss ),02e55 , 11 R350
Great work , I am sure you will be very happy..... curious though .. any reason why you wouldnt bore it out to 6.0L ? With that amount of work , it would be very convenient.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Holy Sheet!!
I'm doing the same thing BUT was having trouble with the car stuttering at 2500rpm. I have the 82mm TB but the MAF is the choke point or the dual CAI is just bringing in too much air for the MAF to handle and is getting confused. The elbow after the MAF and before the ported SC inlet also needs to have fins inside to smooth out the air and mesh screens should be inserted in front of 2 Y inlets and another at the Y outlet into the MAF.
Can you give me your source for the modified MAF, fuel pump, injectors and larger crank pulley? I want to make sure these components are similar to mine.
I plan on adding 15mm to my stock from 150mm crank pulley to 165mm which will give me another 6psi . I have a 65mm SC pulley now which gives me 12psi measured so I plan to settle down at 18psi which should be the max boost for the Kleemann Autorotor twin-screw blower.
Are you using www.abacoperformance.com for the MAF or somebody else? What is the brand and PN# of the injectors you plan to use? I purchased SLR injectors but may just return them if you've got better ones. Please share with us the PN# for the pump as well. Who's doing your crank pulley? ASP or a company in Sweden? Can you refer me to your vendors so I don't have to go through a trial and error process?
I truly believe that if we can get the MAF, injectors, fuel pump and SC pully issues sorted out, these Kleemanized cars can break the dragtimes overall MB record of 10.5 second ET and 133 trap record WITHOUT nitrous.
I'm doing the same thing BUT was having trouble with the car stuttering at 2500rpm. I have the 82mm TB but the MAF is the choke point or the dual CAI is just bringing in too much air for the MAF to handle and is getting confused. The elbow after the MAF and before the ported SC inlet also needs to have fins inside to smooth out the air and mesh screens should be inserted in front of 2 Y inlets and another at the Y outlet into the MAF.
Can you give me your source for the modified MAF, fuel pump, injectors and larger crank pulley? I want to make sure these components are similar to mine.
I plan on adding 15mm to my stock from 150mm crank pulley to 165mm which will give me another 6psi . I have a 65mm SC pulley now which gives me 12psi measured so I plan to settle down at 18psi which should be the max boost for the Kleemann Autorotor twin-screw blower.
Are you using www.abacoperformance.com for the MAF or somebody else? What is the brand and PN# of the injectors you plan to use? I purchased SLR injectors but may just return them if you've got better ones. Please share with us the PN# for the pump as well. Who's doing your crank pulley? ASP or a company in Sweden? Can you refer me to your vendors so I don't have to go through a trial and error process?
I truly believe that if we can get the MAF, injectors, fuel pump and SC pully issues sorted out, these Kleemanized cars can break the dragtimes overall MB record of 10.5 second ET and 133 trap record WITHOUT nitrous.
Last edited by AMGSC; 11-24-2009 at 11:40 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Hey ABALONE, I have the same Snap-On tool box as the one you have in the pictures...1980's when they were made to last...Great motor build keep the power turning!
#12
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Land of Blondes...
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2001: Supercharged E55 AMG
Wow, thanks a lot for the support friends ![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
I will update the info on the parts used when the engine is all started up and measured up so everything is working
AMGSC --> Thanks for the info, we can keep in contact in PM when we get a bit longer on my project. Hope we can get our cars to work out fine.
I'm running a 63,5 mm S/C pulley, but thinking of going up to a bigger one combined with a bigger crank pulley. To small S/C pulley will only get belt slip and increased the wear and stress the bearings. Problem is that you can't go to big on the crank pulley to increase boost, cause it will not be much space between the water pump pulley (you could go smaller on the water pump pulley to of course)
I calculated that i will need a 200+ mm crank pulley to reach over 1,0 bar of boost, so there i might have a problem
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Crank pulley will be a custom made one on top of the stock crank pulley = a new larger ring will be heat/cold mounted on the stock crank pulley.
Regarding the bore to 6 liter or so. Decided not to go that route. It will not increase the HP that much as one would think, only the torque, and with 5,4L i will have enough torque to play with
We are talking about a 5,4L engine, i think we get a bit spoiled sometimes and not realize that it's quite big after all
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Going with a bigger bore will also make the engine weaker cause the 5,4L is not that thick, and the biggest problem is that i would have had to with new head gaskets and other things that will have to be modified for a 6 liter big cylinder bore = To much extra work and to few HP to gain.
Also decided to not go with cams, at least not at this time. To much money right now for me. And after reading a bit and talked to a few, there isn't that much to gain from cams if i look at it from how i use my car, on the streets. A few top HP would of course be cool, but not the the cost of a high reving engine that wakes up after 5200 rpm, the automatic gearbox will still shift at just over 6000 rpms so i really don't see the gain for me. Think power will be there after all.![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
I'll keep you posted
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
I will update the info on the parts used when the engine is all started up and measured up so everything is working
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
AMGSC --> Thanks for the info, we can keep in contact in PM when we get a bit longer on my project. Hope we can get our cars to work out fine.
I'm running a 63,5 mm S/C pulley, but thinking of going up to a bigger one combined with a bigger crank pulley. To small S/C pulley will only get belt slip and increased the wear and stress the bearings. Problem is that you can't go to big on the crank pulley to increase boost, cause it will not be much space between the water pump pulley (you could go smaller on the water pump pulley to of course)
I calculated that i will need a 200+ mm crank pulley to reach over 1,0 bar of boost, so there i might have a problem
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Crank pulley will be a custom made one on top of the stock crank pulley = a new larger ring will be heat/cold mounted on the stock crank pulley.
Regarding the bore to 6 liter or so. Decided not to go that route. It will not increase the HP that much as one would think, only the torque, and with 5,4L i will have enough torque to play with
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![bow](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bowdown.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Going with a bigger bore will also make the engine weaker cause the 5,4L is not that thick, and the biggest problem is that i would have had to with new head gaskets and other things that will have to be modified for a 6 liter big cylinder bore = To much extra work and to few HP to gain.
Also decided to not go with cams, at least not at this time. To much money right now for me. And after reading a bit and talked to a few, there isn't that much to gain from cams if i look at it from how i use my car, on the streets. A few top HP would of course be cool, but not the the cost of a high reving engine that wakes up after 5200 rpm, the automatic gearbox will still shift at just over 6000 rpms so i really don't see the gain for me. Think power will be there after all.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
I'll keep you posted
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Great let's keep in touch. I am already running and all 8 cylinders are at exactly 160 after flooring it for over 1K miles. Only problem I have is slight stumble/stutter at 2500rpm due to MAF.
I also decided to stay with the 5.4 block although the spare 5.4 block that was damaged can still be bored if I get bored. Vadim at FD has the contact of the shop that built HAVOC's 5.7 litre which is a beast since I rode in it just today.
I also decided to stay with the 5.4 block although the spare 5.4 block that was damaged can still be bored if I get bored. Vadim at FD has the contact of the shop that built HAVOC's 5.7 litre which is a beast since I rode in it just today.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
2005 E55 AMG - - 2005 SL55 AMG - - - - - - 2006 SLK55 AMG - - - - - - 2013 Ducati Diavel AMG -
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Good luck with the build and keep us posted.
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Wait until all the intake and exhaust mods with more boost and ECU/TCU tune are on!
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
Last edited by Havoc; 11-25-2009 at 05:15 AM.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
Looks Good!
Thought you had to pull the tranny along with the block? That thing should be great if all works out.
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Looks Good!
Thought you had to pull the tranny along with the block? That thing should be great if all works out.
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
btw...I have a 5.5 litre block FD can bore out to 6.1 liter for sale at $500 if anyone is interestd.
Vadim can prolly build this for a ridiculously great price. He's already got Havoc's 5.7SL55 running smooth as velvet but powerful as a hammer.
I believe that once the MAF restriction is solved by FD, ALL of the Kleemanized SC'd cars (E's, CLK's, SLK's and C's and all the 500s) will now have a stage 9 package which will include dual 3" CAIs, 82mm TB, larger injectors and fuel pump much like what Magnus is doing and a 12-18psi boost level.
Vadim can prolly build this for a ridiculously great price. He's already got Havoc's 5.7SL55 running smooth as velvet but powerful as a hammer.
I believe that once the MAF restriction is solved by FD, ALL of the Kleemanized SC'd cars (E's, CLK's, SLK's and C's and all the 500s) will now have a stage 9 package which will include dual 3" CAIs, 82mm TB, larger injectors and fuel pump much like what Magnus is doing and a 12-18psi boost level.
#21
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
By looking at the pic of the SC, Your going to run into tuning issues with the stock (tan) injectors. Looking at the scope of this project I would highly recommend upgrading to a 55k injector. You will find the duty cycle of the stock injectors to be maxed out... Well before you ever get to the goal you want.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
By looking at the pic of the SC, Your going to run into tuning issues with the stock (tan) injectors. Looking at the scope of this project I would highly recommend upgrading to a 55k injector. You will find the duty cycle of the stock injectors to be maxed out... Well before you ever get to the goal you want.
I've already figured that the size of my crank pulley needs to increase from 150mm to 165mm which will still clear the water pump pulley. This will take me to 16psi (12psi sc pulley + 6psi Crank pulley).
#23
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
At 1.2bar even the 55k injectors will max out. What do you recommend for these MBs running that much boost which Magnus and I are both planning to do? Would you have a part number you suggest? And what about your fuel pump. What did you do to upgrade it? I know you are running on 12psi as well.
I've already figured that the size of my crank pulley needs to increase from 150mm to 165mm which will still clear the water pump pulley. This will take me to 16psi (12psi sc pulley + 6psi Crank pulley).
I've already figured that the size of my crank pulley needs to increase from 150mm to 165mm which will still clear the water pump pulley. This will take me to 16psi (12psi sc pulley + 6psi Crank pulley).
Maybe look at an SLR injector. In most cases you want a better injector rather than something to compensate for the lack of injector.
#24
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Land of Blondes...
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2001: Supercharged E55 AMG
By looking at the pic of the SC, Your going to run into tuning issues with the stock (tan) injectors. Looking at the scope of this project I would highly recommend upgrading to a 55k injector. You will find the duty cycle of the stock injectors to be maxed out... Well before you ever get to the goal you want.
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
Stock injectors on a W210 are only at about right under 300cc and they have to be "raped" with 8 bas of fuel pressure to manage to get along with the Kleemann S/C fuel system, thats way tooo high
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
#25
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Land of Blondes...
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2001: Supercharged E55 AMG
Looks Good!
Thought you had to pull the tranny along with the block? That thing should be great if all works out.
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Depending on how much damage occured to mine I'm wondering if I should look into boring/sleeving my 4.3L instead of replacing it entirely?...I feel like more and more of these stout rebuilds are showing up, and running at that.
Care to share what typical costs are for this work? AMGSC? Abalone, I understand your far away also so $ may be different.
Good Luck!
Well, i'm in Sweden, and it wouldn't be quite fair to just transfer my costs from SEK to $US now when to US dollar is so weak compared to the Swedish Crown. You would probably think i'm crazy paying that much
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)