It's been dynoed...
04-06-2005, 09:09 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55
It's been dynoed...
Plain and simple....thanks to Marcus from dragging me away from my project (The home theatre setup sounds awesome by the way) and being such a horrible influence 
:p
My scanner decided it didn't feel like working so I had to take pictures of the dyno sheets...(performed on a dynojet)
http://www.ekaz.net/E55.htm
:p My scanner decided it didn't feel like working so I had to take pictures of the dyno sheets...(performed on a dynojet)
http://www.ekaz.net/E55.htm
04-06-2005, 09:47 AM
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 S65
Do you know if those numbers are corrected or uncorrected HP? Let us know. I've seen a bunch of guys talking about what these cars are pushing and I'm curious if we are all talking the same thing. I am planning of doing some mods and want to have a good idea based on you guys. Thanks for the help.
Derrick
Derrick
04-06-2005, 12:41 PM
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55
Yes those numbers are RWHP and as for correction, yes...CF factor of 1.0.
It was great weather for a dyno Saturday....65 degrees, 13% humidity (maybe it was 19%?), and pressure of about 29
It was great weather for a dyno Saturday....65 degrees, 13% humidity (maybe it was 19%?), and pressure of about 29
04-06-2005, 12:55 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
Originally Posted by ekaz
Yes those numbers are RWHP and as for correction, yes...CF factor of 1.0.
It was great weather for a dyno Saturday....65 degrees, 13% humidity (maybe it was 19%?), and pressure of about 29
It was great weather for a dyno Saturday....65 degrees, 13% humidity (maybe it was 19%?), and pressure of about 29
04-06-2005, 02:16 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
Originally Posted by ekaz
K&N filters and the intake from an S55.
Trending Topics
04-06-2005, 04:56 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by medici78
Pretty impressive, considering it's relatively stock. Going by factory numbers, you're at around 10% drivetrain loss compared to factroy numbers, though most people I've talked to use 15% for auto trannies, making this even more impressive. Was this on the stock wheels or the 20s?
At 15% he's making 511bhp and 560btq. Well beyond factory specs. We have 400rwtq at nearly 2000rpm!
-m
04-06-2005, 06:10 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55
Originally Posted by Dvinn
I am really liking those Mayas. Does the DTRs come in 18" or 17" sizes and how heavy are they?
Does the DTRs come in 18" or 17" sizes and how heavy are they?
04-06-2005, 11:35 PM
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 S65
Originally Posted by Marcus Frost
E55 transmissions are very efficient, but 10% is not possible for an auto simply based on the fact it has a torque converter and it simply cannot spin 1:1. Even 15% is being very kind.
At 15% he's making 511bhp and 560btq. Well beyond factory specs. We have 400rwtq at nearly 2000rpm!
-m
At 15% he's making 511bhp and 560btq. Well beyond factory specs. We have 400rwtq at nearly 2000rpm!
-m
04-07-2005, 10:47 AM
#14
Originally Posted by DJe55
The reason it seems so much more than factory specs is because it's a corrected number. To really know where you're at you need to have the car dynoed without correcting the numbers. The uncorrected numbers will be closer to the 410rwhp range. I'm sure most of you guys know this but thought I would mention it anyway.
He said the correction factor used here was 1.0. If true, that means the corrected numbers and actual numbers are the same. The reason dynos use correction factors is to account for wide variations in temperature, humidity, etc. that affect performance. On a very hot, high humidity day the CF is going to be over 1, raising the actual numbers. On a cool, dry day the CF will be less than 1, lowering the actual numbers. This is designed to allow comparison of different cars/dyno runs even though the conditions were different (note: I'm not saying this works perfectly, just that that is the intent.) In short, the corrected numbers are normally the more accurate ones, although here it doesn't appear to make any difference.
