W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Improviz, 0-125 vs 1/4 mile times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-30-2005, 03:42 PM
  #1  
M&M
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
M&M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Improviz, 0-125 vs 1/4 mile times

Dude, I don't have the time to pull the stats you looking for & even if I get them you will find a way to squirm out of it. If I find a car that traps 85mph on the 1/4 & then we talk about 0-15mph times, is that really going to helps?

So instead I'm going to pull a Bishop to Knight 4 checkmate move on your a$$. Let's see that superior intellect a work when the reverse is applied to you. Of course you know that whatever argument you squirm out, you will be prviding m with the same argument to use against you.

You state that although the M5 is 0.8 seconds faster than the E55 to 124mph, the 1/4 mile time will be similar. So I guess the same could be applied to an M5 & an SL/CL65. We've all seen the CL65 test where it got the same 0-124mph time as the M5, 13.8. But hey I love your excuses that that was a dud car, so I'll use all the tests I can find.

Here's the fastest 65:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/sl65amg2004-1.htm

Test in ams 13/2004
Gewicht 2057 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,0 s
0 - 100 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,1 s
0 - 130 km/h 5,9 s
0 - 140 km/h 6,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 10,1 s
0 - 200 km/h 12,6 s
400 m, stehender Start 11,9 s

Here's another:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/sl65amg2004-2.htm

Test in sport auto 09/2004
Gewicht 2049 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,3 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,6 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 7,1 s
0 - 160 km/h 8,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 10,5 s
0 - 200 km/h 13,1 s

& here's the slowest:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/cl65amg2004-1.htm

Test in sport auto 08/2004
Gewicht 2109 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,6 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 6,6 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 11,4 s
0 - 200 km/h 13,8 s

Now, the fastest 0-124mph for the 65 is 12.6.
The fastest 0-124mph for the M5 is 13.5 by Auto Bild.

The next fastest 65 test is 13.1
There are 2-3 tests of the M5 that got 13.8-13.9.

So it looks like the 65 is around 0.7-0.9 faster to 124mph.

So, my question is, forget about the badges on each car. Tell me again about your theory about 0-124mph & 1/4 mile times?
Old 04-30-2005, 05:26 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
The Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting M3 times on 1/4 mile
http://www.m3registry.com/siriusm3fo...Drag%20Day.wmv
Old 05-21-2005, 02:14 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Missed this one....

Originally Posted by Compensated BMW Spokesman and Troll Monkey&Moron
So, my question is, forget about the badges on each car. Tell me again about your theory about 0-124mph & 1/4 mile times?
Um, I already did, monkey boy....here, remember??

And the data still stands: cars tested many seconds apart, far more than the 0.8 seconds separating the M5 and E55, in time-speed were shown to be tied in time-distance. As to your beloved batmobile-resembling M5, we shall find out soon enough. I know that in between jerk-off sessions to BMW magazine spreads, you love to bother people with your drivel, but so far, drivel is all you've got. You don't have any direct comparison test data of the two cars in a time to distance race. Come back when you do.

Now go away and cash the nice little check BMW wrote you to go plugging their cars for over three years now on Internet forums all over the world.


Last edited by Improviz; 05-21-2005 at 12:52 PM.
Old 05-21-2005, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
M5KILLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mason Neck, VA
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by M&M
Dude, I don't have the time to pull the stats you looking for & even if I get them you will find a way to squirm out of it. If I find a car that traps 85mph on the 1/4 & then we talk about 0-15mph times, is that really going to helps?

So instead I'm going to pull a Bishop to Knight 4 checkmate move on your a$$. Let's see that superior intellect a work when the reverse is applied to you. Of course you know that whatever argument you squirm out, you will be prviding m with the same argument to use against you.

You state that although the M5 is 0.8 seconds faster than the E55 to 124mph, the 1/4 mile time will be similar. So I guess the same could be applied to an M5 & an SL/CL65. We've all seen the CL65 test where it got the same 0-124mph time as the M5, 13.8. But hey I love your excuses that that was a dud car, so I'll use all the tests I can find.

Here's the fastest 65:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/sl65amg2004-1.htm

Test in ams 13/2004
Gewicht 2057 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,0 s
0 - 100 km/h 3,9 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,1 s
0 - 130 km/h 5,9 s
0 - 140 km/h 6,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 180 km/h 10,1 s
0 - 200 km/h 12,6 s
400 m, stehender Start 11,9 s

Here's another:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/sl65amg2004-2.htm

Test in sport auto 09/2004
Gewicht 2049 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,3 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,3 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,6 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 7,1 s
0 - 160 km/h 8,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 10,5 s
0 - 200 km/h 13,1 s

& here's the slowest:

http://www.einszweidrei.de/mercedes/cl65amg2004-1.htm

Test in sport auto 08/2004
Gewicht 2109 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,6 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,8 s
0 - 120 km/h 6,6 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 8,2 s
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 11,4 s
0 - 200 km/h 13,8 s

Now, the fastest 0-124mph for the 65 is 12.6.
The fastest 0-124mph for the M5 is 13.5 by Auto Bild.

The next fastest 65 test is 13.1
There are 2-3 tests of the M5 that got 13.8-13.9.

So it looks like the 65 is around 0.7-0.9 faster to 124mph.

So, my question is, forget about the badges on each car. Tell me again about your theory about 0-124mph & 1/4 mile times?
some food for thought that even if blah blah blah were true. heres what 7% of purchase price can do for our cars. doenst a dinan intake cost 5k and give you what 5hp???

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/108419-0-125-12-9-sec-0-125-0-20sec.html

i assume youve already trolled it though, just couldnt bare the thought of commenting.
Old 05-21-2005, 12:37 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by The Hawk
Very interesting M3 times on 1/4 mile
http://www.m3registry.com/siriusm3fo...Drag%20Day.wmv
Wow, those modified M3's were running in the 12's, around one second faster than stock! You mean to tell us that heavily modified cars can run significantly faster 1/4 mile times than when they're stock? Who woulda thunk it....who could even fathom such a thing?

Well, maybe the owner of this 12 second Pontiac GT, a 14 second car when stock, (four speed auto to the M3's six speed manual) might have thunk it...

...or this 11 second Pontiac GTP, a 14 second car when stock,(four speed auto again)....

...or the owner of this 11 second Acura NSX (a low 13 second car stock)...

...or the owner of this 11 second Toyota MR2, a 17 second car stock...

...or the owner of this 11 second Audi S4, a 14 second car stock...

...or his fellow 11 second Audi S4 owner...

...or this 11 second Mazda Miata (a 17 second car stock)...

...or the owner of this 11 second Volkswagon Jetta, a 15 second car stock....

...or the owner of this 10 second C5 Corvette, a low 13 car stock...

...or the owner of this 10 second Supra, a mid 13 car stock....

...or the owner of this 10 second Pontiac Grand Prix GTP, a 14 second car stock....

...or the owner of this 10 second Honda Civic...

...or this 10 second Subaru WRX owner....

...or this 10 second Trans Am owner...

...or this 10 second Lexus SC300 owner...

...or this 10 second Mazda 323 owner....

...or this 10 second Chevy pickup owner....

...or this 9 second Mazda RX7 owner....

...or this 9 second Camaro owner....

...or this 8 second Mustang owner...

...or this 8 second Toyota Supra owner...

...or this 8 second 350Z owner....

...or this 8 second Viper owner....

....and you're in here bragging about modded M3's running 12's? Congratulations: there are modded Miatas, Civics, Grand Prix's, Jettas, RX7s, Mazda 323s, WRXs, and Chevy Pickups who will bury you.

Last edited by Improviz; 05-21-2005 at 12:56 PM.
Old 05-21-2005, 08:48 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Doctodd33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,971
Received 140 Likes on 107 Posts
ML350
dam Improviz.....you wasted his a$$. Someone got...how is it?.......POWN3D....something like that, although i dont know what the hell it means.....lmao

T
Old 05-22-2005, 08:42 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
04 E55
Originally Posted by Improviz
lol!
Old 09-24-2005, 09:01 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ProjectC55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: City with Tall buildings!
Posts: 5,475
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Originally Posted by Improviz
Um, I already did, monkey boy....here, remember??

And the data still stands: cars tested many seconds apart, far more than the 0.8 seconds separating the M5 and E55, in time-speed were shown to be tied in time-distance. As to your beloved batmobile-resembling M5, we shall find out soon enough. I know that in between jerk-off sessions to BMW magazine spreads, you love to bother people with your drivel, but so far, drivel is all you've got. You don't have any direct comparison test data of the two cars in a time to distance race. Come back when you do.

Now go away and cash the nice little check BMW wrote you to go plugging their cars for over three years now on Internet forums all over the world.

LOL!! Oh .my Gosh! Impro you are something else!!
Old 09-24-2005, 10:41 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
siswati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'10 Panamera S, '06 AMG CLS55, '07 Miata MX5, '02 MB SPRINTER, '99 Spec Miata Race Car (2X)
Yeah Improviz

despite being misguided on occassion (imho) - you sure do crack me up

bye the way M&M and Hawk - please keep posting - I love to see you guys bait the hook with your tasty meaningless drivel and then see Improviz chomp on the hook (he just cant help himself) - but of course he makes off with you hook, line, sinker, rods, reels, boats and who knows what as well!

gotta love this stuff - way more fun than ****!
Siswati
Old 09-24-2005, 11:11 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DerekFSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by M&M
Dude, I don't have the time to pull the stats you looking for & even if I get them you will find a way to squirm out of it.
M&M, this stuff really gets old. Can't you do something else?
Old 09-25-2005, 12:42 AM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Guys, this thread is like months old. We've all changed since then.
Old 09-25-2005, 03:52 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
VelocitE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Encino
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'06 CLS55 AMG
Damn, I thought it was a new one too, was looking forward to a good laugh. M&M getting tore into by Impro is always great fun!!
Old 09-25-2005, 04:41 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BMWEATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strip bar in Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
Originally Posted by Improviz
Um, I already did, monkey boy....here, remember??

And the data still stands: cars tested many seconds apart, far more than the 0.8 seconds separating the M5 and E55, in time-speed were shown to be tied in time-distance. As to your beloved batmobile-resembling M5, we shall find out soon enough. I know that in between jerk-off sessions to BMW magazine spreads, you love to bother people with your drivel, but so far, drivel is all you've got. You don't have any direct comparison test data of the two cars in a time to distance race. Come back when you do.

Now go away and cash the nice little check BMW wrote you to go plugging their cars for over three years now on Internet forums all over the world.

i love this guy!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Improviz, 0-125 vs 1/4 mile times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.