Here is my opinion on the 63's....give me your opinions
Mercedes has already released the information about the 63 engine. It will be a N/A 6.2 liter V8 making 503hp, and will be mated to a 7 speed automatic.
However, I don't think MB will attempt to sacrifice ANY power over the 55 engine, therefore I am forced to think that they will attempt to boost overall performance, including low end grunt.
That brings me to my ideas about a F/I 63 engine.
Here is what I think will happen.
C55---->C63 N/A
CLK55-->CLK63 N/A
SLK55-->SLK63 N/A
CLS55-->CLS63 F/I
CL55--->CL55 F/I
E55---->E63 F/I
S55---->S63 F/I
Does this look right?
If that makes sense at all.
You will not see a Kompressor version of the 6.3 engine, unfortunately. It is a great motor but the poor gas mileage and emissions are making MB sway away from the Kompressor setup. It seems that we will conitnue to see the TT V12, but for now the 55 & 32K engines are going the way of the dinosaurs...
I will probably be keeping my next 55K car for some time to come. Forced induction trumps any brand loyalty I have. I love having an extra 100-200+hp on tap with choice mods done in a very reliable manner... these high strung, high compression motors just don't offer that...
-m
According to both Motor Trend and Automobile magazines, the new M156 6.2L V8 (N/A 6.3) will find its way into the ML63, CLK63, E63, and R63. Two turbo charged versions of this engine are 'in the works' and will produce 563hp/664lb-ft and 697hp/886lb-ft (but no mention where these engines might end up). Additionally, they state the evolution of the N/A version would be to a increased displacement of 6.8L (N/A 6.9).
That said, I think it's likely that the upper level AMG's (CLS, CL, SL, S) will be getting a SC or TT version of MB's slick new N/A 5.5L V8 (which debuts in the 2007 S550), making 10-20% more HP than what the current SC 5.5L.
~ Ian
The NA engine will appear next year in the AMG versions of ML63, CLK63, E63, and R63. This engine is also slated to grow to 6.8 ltrs.
Trending Topics
one major reason that MB is choosing NA is due to the 7sp box, it can only handle certain amount of torque...
if I remember correctly, the current 5sp can handle 700lbs++ of torque and the new 7sp is around the 500lbs+ of torque...
don't quote exactly, but definately this a documented fact.
Until they find a heavy duty 7 sp, I doub the V12 TT's will have the 7 sp auto for now.
The SLK55 is the only AMG with the 7sp box and it works really well. With only 355/376lbs it easily dips into 12.7 to 12.8 and some members have gone as low as 12.5xx.
Even if the new C AMG keeps the 5.5 l or the 6.3 and tuned to about 410-420hp, the car will definately dip into mid to high 12's with the 7sp AMG box.
I'm guessing...the e,s,m,g, r will get the 490 to 505 tuned 6.3 engine with 470+lbs of torque.. which will make the e very good overall performer.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
one major reason that MB is choosing NA is due to the 7sp box, it can only handle certain amount of torque...
if I remember correctly, the current 5sp can handle 700lbs++ of torque and the new 7sp is around the 500lbs+ of torque...
don't quote exactly, but definately this a documented fact.
Until they find a heavy duty 7 sp, I doub the V12 TT's will have the 7 sp auto for now.
The SLK55 is the only AMG with the 7sp box and it works really well. With only 355/376lbs it easily dips into 12.7 to 12.8 and some members have gone as low as 12.5xx.
Even if the new C AMG keeps the 5.5 l or the 6.3 and tuned to about 410-420hp, the car will definately dip into mid to high 12's with the 7sp AMG box.
I'm guessing...the e,s,m,g, r will get the 490 to 505 tuned 6.3 engine with 470+lbs of torque.. which will make the e very good overall performer.
Ted
Sure they arent breaking, but its not safe from MB's point of view. Before u can sell a piece of machinery to the public, with a warranty, it has to work way below the limit at which it'd break to be reliable...
As a marketing stand point......why?
Exactly! They can't and they won't.Too much at stake here with AMG's first production engine. The M5 is killer (E55 is the killer of killers :v )......with that known........who would spend the same, if not more, for an inferior car then the BMW? (aside from the AMG freaks like myself
).And who is to say they won't work on the handling aspect of the E63.Do I think it will handle as well as the M5..............no,but I'm sure it will be nipping at its heals at the track/corners.My opinion still rides that the W211 e55 is the car to own for a few more years untill they tweak that 6.2 Liter out.(due to the tuning aspect of FI)
But........a stock E63 WILL be faster then a stock E55. Period.
A lot of people are counting out the E63 before it arrives
............HELL........BMW lovers thought of the upcoming M5 was the HOLY GRAIL years before it arrived.
The NA engine will appear next year in the AMG versions of ML63, CLK63, E63, and R63. This engine is also slated to grow to 6.8 ltrs.
~ Ian







