Went on Dyno yesterday...The lastest machine from DYNO DYNAMICS only 4 in the world...Told it doesnt matter on this machine...

Unfortunately coudnt put on DYNO mode, doesnt work the same as in US cars...but after couple of pulls ASP and ABC got confused and messtage said porblem with both on those systems, so basically the werent working anyway...

Also we switched the car only one time btw the run and they turned my heater up so it would take away some heat from engine...

Anyways:

1 pull showed 343 KBT at the wheels

2nd showed 338 KBT at the wheels

3rd showed 328 KBT at the wheels


Been told that we need to add those number by 1.36 to have HP numbers...

so last run showed around 443 HP at the wheels...

Torgue curve showing around 800-820 of Torgues stock should be aroound 700-720 (European measures)...

Raced yesterday night in 1/4 mile and beat stock E55's by 3-4 cars...


I will scan the graphs and post it here either on Today or on Monday...

 

what mods other than the eisenman exhaust do you have?

 

Hmmm...I think his signature has more than the exhaust in it...

 

That sort of difference doesn't count as it is only 0.3 sec.
(Terminal speed 180km/h = 50 m/sec. 3.5 car lengths =17m or 1/3 of 50m/sec = 0.33sec)
You will get bigger variation in the same car over 6 runs on the same night. Mine range from 12.3 to 12.9 sec, depending on the launch.

 

You mean times 1.36, not adds 1.36, right? Nice numbers.

 

i was referring to motor mods,don't care about the rest.was trying to figure out how with only eisenmann exhaust he beat a stock e55 by three cars;must have been a w210 e55 for that to happen.and no i wasn't there but in reality that wouldn't happen unless they let off or had problems(heat soak,etc.)

 

i don't know where you get those calculations but three to four cars at that speed is way more than .3 seconds.for instance,cars i've run on the street as well as the track that were a half seond faster were usually two cars ahead;and this ratio has been tested time after time w/ different races and cars.all of these cars and runs were in the 12.0-13.0 sec range.

 

Kleemann Style Headers Carlsson C-tronic 2 (lowering module)
Got to think that this stuff helps as well!!!
Have you seen the Kleemann headers?

 

Yep...I think those headers helped Me a lot....Eben when other E55 got a jump, I would still catch up with him and by 120-130 we would have big gap btw US...then I would hit the limiter at 155...

Btw tuned M6 did 315km on speedo...around 195-197mph...

I didnt remove my Primary CAT yet, I think they would help ME even more at higher speeds...but this another topic...

 

damn, i don't know how i missed seeing them.my mind has been racing here lately.

 

Nope - his calculation is fairly accurate. Cars that run in the 12-13 sec range in the 1/4 mile usually have trap speeds between 110 and 120 mph. That's the same as 160-176 ft/sec. Using the median value, at 168 ft/sec, a car will travel 84 feet in 0.5 seconds. For a car that is 16 feet long, this is a little over 5 car lengths. Having a half second and two car length difference in the 1/4 mile means you're going through the traps at 46 mph.

 

It's called MATHS.
You quote anectotal evidence ie. guesswork. Do the maths and you will see that at 1/4 mile the car is travelling at 180kph which means it takes 1 sec to travel exactly 50m. (180,000 m divided by 3600 sec) One car length is 4.85 m. 3.5 car lengths equals 17 m, or 1/3 of 1sec travel time. It does not take Einstein to figure it out.
3-4 car lengths at 1/4 mi mark, travelling at full speed is 0.3 -0.4 sec.
I think the metric calculations are a bit confusing...refer to the post above. Amen.

 

sorry in the real worl condititons these calculsations don't fit any races i've experienced at all and i've been doing it for years.all your mathematical equations don't add uip in my experiences.

 

So, your real world defies science...?
Your butt dyno is probably also more accurate than any machine, because "you've been using IT for years" too!
Sorry, but all my life I've dealt with facts, not "gut feeling" and "years of experience". You would never put a man on the Moon relying on your "experience"

 

like i said,the distances between the cars at the end of the race( quarter mile) ;whether marked off by odometer or at the track are in the approximate.these races, all of them for the most part involved vehicles with similar e.t and trap speeds and the results were what i stated and that is a fact.you weren't there and your "real world" scientific numbers don't mean jack to me.it was what is was;funny how everytime i post a kill story, which isn't often; some idiot has to question the outcome even when the results were within what is reasonable( not exact)just for the sake of argument.if it's so important and you believe that your scientific numbers are the rule,go to the track and video your results and then prove your point,until then don't assume your method is foolproof and my statements are not credible.get out from behind your computer and "walk the walk" if you are going to "talk the talk".

 

All so called "races" involving cars like the E55 at the drag strip are individual sprints where each car triggers his own photo cell in a rolling start. You are racing against the clock, not the guy near you (unless you are in the BIG LEAGUE, where reaction time and all that **** really counts)
Just because you beat someone by five car lengths does not mean your time is five car length's better than his. You could in fact have equal times , he just got bogged down for 0.5 sec! Dream on buddy, or better still, go back to high school and you will have more respect for science and maths.
BTW, it's not just your Maths and Science, your spelling and punctuation stinks too.

 

i wasn't the one claiming the 3- 4 car equating to .3 sec,get your facts straight.i don't have to dream, i experience it and it is what i state and that is the fact,and by the way if i want to further my education i'll go back to college not high school;i wouldn't limit my knowledge to that level of education as it seems that you have done.and i do respect math and science when it is applied correctly. i made my point and you made yours;somehow you keep trying to make it personal and drift away from the topic.let it go,i have!

 

You made it personal by calling me "some idiot". My reference to High School was only to point out how basic the knowledge of maths was required to solve this problem. I had no idea I was dealing with a highly educated college graduate...my sincere apology

 

my first post was at 5:40 am and was half asleep after taking xanax.my punctuation and spelling are flawless except for that post,so get over yourself and don't try and divert attention away from the issue.that is what people do when they can't respond w/a legitimate answer.

 

OK, I give up, have it your way. My initial post was to point out that a single win by 3 -4 car lenghts does not prove that one car is necessarily faster than the other. One can get that sort of variation between runs in the same car. The rest was just to show how it can vary at the drag strip. How did it get off topic? You decided that my calculations were suspect beacause you saw it with your own eyes and counted: one thousand, two thousand, three thousand as the cars went by. Now, that is accurate!

 

commmunity college on a football scholarship? damn, you must be a genius to have known that or psychic or maybe just some lonely old **** to waste your time and fabricate things and make personal attacks.personally,i have a life and much better things to do than waste my time and others with this nonsense.try venting your frustrations regarding your inadequacies somewhere else where it might benefit you more in a positive way

 

BOYS...you fisnished ???

 

Round one.
It's all your fault! Why couldn't you have got some decent mods?
You would have beaten your buddy by 15 car lengths and my friend here wouldn't need to count all his fingers (and toes) to work out the relative speeds of those cars.

 

Hahaha...soon my freind..sooon

 

1.36 is NOT RIGHT AT ALL. 19-20% is proper conversion rate for automatic (even the best automatics on earth are in that range).