I feel a dyno coming on
09-12-2006, 04:10 PM
#26
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sc
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'07 e63
did you say...
480 RWhp????? Not being able to clamp onto a wire only affects the torque #...right??? The RWhp # is not affected by that, or is it.
If you got 480 HP, holy s_it!! How did you only get 13.0_in the 1/4.
Am I missing something here?
D
If you got 480 HP, holy s_it!! How did you only get 13.0_in the 1/4.
Am I missing something here?
D
09-12-2006, 04:11 PM
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
So that is 480hp at the rear wheels? Thats well more than 507 at the crank then. Im lost at this point then. I really dont get it!
Thanks for the dyno run im sure this will become a very active thread.
09-12-2006, 04:12 PM
#28
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 SLS AMG
Many people have been posting double as they hit submit again while it seems that the site is frozen, hence the 2 posts prior to your last one.
Yeah, can you explain the results for us 'dyno ignorant fools'. 480rwhp seems very high. Are you saying then that this is a mistake based on the inability to obtain the RPM and torque figures? Or, are you saying that that is legit despite being able to obtain the other numbers? Also how many miles do you have now?
Yeah, can you explain the results for us 'dyno ignorant fools'. 480rwhp seems very high. Are you saying then that this is a mistake based on the inability to obtain the RPM and torque figures? Or, are you saying that that is legit despite being able to obtain the other numbers? Also how many miles do you have now?
09-12-2006, 04:16 PM
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....5&postcount=23
Last edited by bfnnrgn; 09-12-2006 at 04:21 PM.
09-12-2006, 04:21 PM
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So.Ca.
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
09-12-2006, 04:23 PM
#33
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 SLS AMG
What are E55 guys getting for numbers? Now that the corrected is 380rwhp, that seems a bit low. Any thoughts on making this more accurate in order to get all the numbers and performance specs?
09-12-2006, 04:24 PM
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes
on
368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
For comparison, what does a stock E55 spin the rollers at, so I can start laughing.........f*ck it I'm already laughing. 
09-12-2006, 04:25 PM
#35
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sc
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'07 e63
Sounds like Derek has a low HP producing engine, or his Hp loss thru the powertrain is huge, OR...... these 6.3, excuse me 6.2 engines are really putting out mid to high 400 HP at the crank. God I hope not.
D
PS: Derek, who signed your engine block, I hope it's not the same kraut who built mine. And, did you have the MAX AC button on during your pull and your 1/4 mile push..
D
PS: Derek, who signed your engine block, I hope it's not the same kraut who built mine. And, did you have the MAX AC button on during your pull and your 1/4 mile push..
09-12-2006, 04:26 PM
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
I had mine dynod when it was brand new. I got 400 hp /468 ft-lbs at the rear wheels and mine is weak compared to some of the others who get 410-420. I might have picked up a few now that theres more miles on it.
Last edited by bfnnrgn; 09-12-2006 at 04:28 PM.
09-12-2006, 04:30 PM
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,725
Received 558 Likes
on
368 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
We already know that the 5 speed is an amazingly efficient transmission. AMAZINGLY, however the new 7 speed is supposed to be even better, and if Derek's car is not, in fact, a dog then the E55 vs. E63 argument was just solved on the dyno IMHO.
09-12-2006, 04:35 PM
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So.Ca.
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
My 05 E55 made sae corrected 396.52HP/476.60Tq 80deg/42% humidity but Im not saying this dyno was correct either.Car made 20hp less on the first pull due to heat soak.You can hear the difference of 20hp when the car is making its pull,it sounded alot more aggressive on the 396 pull for sure.
09-12-2006, 04:44 PM
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: So.Ca.
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55
09-12-2006, 04:53 PM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 E55
so Derek.....what do I win for only missing the prediction by 5Hp?...(375Hp)
Let me guess.......
I'm curious - do you remember the RWTq #?
OK - but in all seriousness...NO WAY is this thing doing 507Hp at the crank!!
Last edited by Kens-E55; 09-12-2006 at 05:00 PM.
09-12-2006, 04:56 PM
#41
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well we all know the E55 dynos the same as the SL55 and that is a 500 HP car so technically the E63 never had a HP advantage except for in marketing speak. It's quite possible that the 7 speed being so close to it's max power that it was adjusted for reliablitly reasons and that is why it's not performing due to drive train loss.
Last edited by bfnnrgn; 09-12-2006 at 04:58 PM.
09-12-2006, 05:11 PM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2004 E55
BTW - with the K2 (before NOS) What was your best time and speed at the track?
(Chris @ C2 has "likened" my '04 to yours in performance-but with my travel schedule...it's almost impossible to get mine to a track..........................any volunteers?
)
09-12-2006, 05:12 PM
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
here are some E55 dynos:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...no-Sheets.html
mine put down 419rwhp, 459 rwtq stock.....
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...no-Sheets.html
mine put down 419rwhp, 459 rwtq stock.....
09-12-2006, 05:15 PM
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
Geez, 380rwhp is pathetic when the outgoing model had at least 20rwhp more and was advertised with a number over 30hp less. I'm so disappointed in M-B and AMG. I still hold out some hope, but not much. Still, 380rwhp should have netted 12s...
09-12-2006, 05:28 PM
#47
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 SL550; C32 (sold)
assuming there's a 20% drivetrain loss, this means the car is only making about 455hp at the crank. where's the rest of the 50hp? something's off.
it could also mean that 7-spped tranny is sucking 33-34% of the power away!
it could also mean that 7-spped tranny is sucking 33-34% of the power away!
Last edited by amgme; 09-12-2006 at 05:36 PM.
09-12-2006, 05:55 PM
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3rd gear. As listed in the first post, Dynojet. Having problem with graph post, nothing really to see other than what I posted.
Comparing to other dynos is a waste in my opinion. My K2 "only" dyno'd at 439rwhp but ran 11.65.
Comparing to other dynos is a waste in my opinion. My K2 "only" dyno'd at 439rwhp but ran 11.65.
09-12-2006, 06:00 PM
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My PS is acting up. Here is the file if someone will convert it.
http://www.whitisconsulting.com/photos/e63dyno.tif
http://www.whitisconsulting.com/photos/e63dyno.tif
Last edited by DerekFSU; 09-12-2006 at 06:15 PM.
