I feel a dyno coming on
Almost a Member!
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: sc
'07 e63
did you say...
480 RWhp????? Not being able to clamp onto a wire only affects the torque #...right??? The RWhp # is not affected by that, or is it.
If you got 480 HP, holy s_it!! How did you only get 13.0_in the 1/4.
Am I missing something here?
D
If you got 480 HP, holy s_it!! How did you only get 13.0_in the 1/4.
Am I missing something here?
D
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 3
Mercedes Benz
So that is 480hp at the rear wheels? Thats well more than 507 at the crank then. Im lost at this point then. I really dont get it!
Thanks for the dyno run im sure this will become a very active thread.
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
2012 SLS AMG
Many people have been posting double as they hit submit again while it seems that the site is frozen, hence the 2 posts prior to your last one.
Yeah, can you explain the results for us 'dyno ignorant fools'. 480rwhp seems very high. Are you saying then that this is a mistake based on the inability to obtain the RPM and torque figures? Or, are you saying that that is legit despite being able to obtain the other numbers? Also how many miles do you have now?
Yeah, can you explain the results for us 'dyno ignorant fools'. 480rwhp seems very high. Are you saying then that this is a mistake based on the inability to obtain the RPM and torque figures? Or, are you saying that that is legit despite being able to obtain the other numbers? Also how many miles do you have now?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....5&postcount=23
Last edited by bfnnrgn; Sep 12, 2006 at 04:21 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
From: So.Ca.
E55
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
2012 SLS AMG
What are E55 guys getting for numbers? Now that the corrected is 380rwhp, that seems a bit low. Any thoughts on making this more accurate in order to get all the numbers and performance specs?
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
For comparison, what does a stock E55 spin the rollers at, so I can start laughing.........f*ck it I'm already laughing. 
Almost a Member!
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: sc
'07 e63
Sounds like Derek has a low HP producing engine, or his Hp loss thru the powertrain is huge, OR...... these 6.3, excuse me 6.2 engines are really putting out mid to high 400 HP at the crank. God I hope not.
D
PS: Derek, who signed your engine block, I hope it's not the same kraut who built mine. And, did you have the MAX AC button on during your pull and your 1/4 mile push..
D
PS: Derek, who signed your engine block, I hope it's not the same kraut who built mine. And, did you have the MAX AC button on during your pull and your 1/4 mile push..
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
I had mine dynod when it was brand new. I got 400 hp /468 ft-lbs at the rear wheels and mine is weak compared to some of the others who get 410-420. I might have picked up a few now that theres more miles on it.
Last edited by bfnnrgn; Sep 12, 2006 at 04:28 PM.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 594
From: Seattle
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
We already know that the 5 speed is an amazingly efficient transmission. AMAZINGLY, however the new 7 speed is supposed to be even better, and if Derek's car is not, in fact, a dog then the E55 vs. E63 argument was just solved on the dyno IMHO.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 0
From: So.Ca.
E55
My 05 E55 made sae corrected 396.52HP/476.60Tq 80deg/42% humidity but Im not saying this dyno was correct either.Car made 20hp less on the first pull due to heat soak.You can hear the difference of 20hp when the car is making its pull,it sounded alot more aggressive on the 396 pull for sure.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
From: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
2004 E55
so Derek.....what do I win for only missing the prediction by 5Hp?...(375Hp)
Let me guess.......
I'm curious - do you remember the RWTq #?
OK - but in all seriousness...NO WAY is this thing doing 507Hp at the crank!!
Last edited by Kens-E55; Sep 12, 2006 at 05:00 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
SL65
Well we all know the E55 dynos the same as the SL55 and that is a 500 HP car so technically the E63 never had a HP advantage except for in marketing speak. It's quite possible that the 7 speed being so close to it's max power that it was adjusted for reliablitly reasons and that is why it's not performing due to drive train loss.
Last edited by bfnnrgn; Sep 12, 2006 at 04:58 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
From: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
2004 E55
507Hp on E63
I smell a RAT!!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
From: Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.
2004 E55
BTW - with the K2 (before NOS) What was your best time and speed at the track?
(Chris @ C2 has "likened" my '04 to yours in performance-but with my travel schedule...it's almost impossible to get mine to a track..........................any volunteers?
)
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
STS,FGT,12C,P85D,M4
here are some E55 dynos:
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...no-Sheets.html
mine put down 419rwhp, 459 rwtq stock.....
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...no-Sheets.html
mine put down 419rwhp, 459 rwtq stock.....
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 3
From: El Paso, TX
'03 G500, '13 G63, '17 GLS63,
Geez, 380rwhp is pathetic when the outgoing model had at least 20rwhp more and was advertised with a number over 30hp less. I'm so disappointed in M-B and AMG. I still hold out some hope, but not much. Still, 380rwhp should have netted 12s...
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
07 SL550; C32 (sold)
assuming there's a 20% drivetrain loss, this means the car is only making about 455hp at the crank. where's the rest of the 50hp? something's off.
it could also mean that 7-spped tranny is sucking 33-34% of the power away!
it could also mean that 7-spped tranny is sucking 33-34% of the power away!
Last edited by amgme; Sep 12, 2006 at 05:36 PM.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
3rd gear. As listed in the first post, Dynojet. Having problem with graph post, nothing really to see other than what I posted.
Comparing to other dynos is a waste in my opinion. My K2 "only" dyno'd at 439rwhp but ran 11.65.
Comparing to other dynos is a waste in my opinion. My K2 "only" dyno'd at 439rwhp but ran 11.65.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
My PS is acting up. Here is the file if someone will convert it.
http://www.whitisconsulting.com/photos/e63dyno.tif
http://www.whitisconsulting.com/photos/e63dyno.tif
Last edited by DerekFSU; Sep 12, 2006 at 06:15 PM.
