My E63 Dyno experience...
04-02-2008, 01:49 PM
#126
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: orange county NY
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 C55(sold)'05 E55(sold)'06 911C4S(sold)'06 ML350 '06 CLS55(sold),buncha slo bikes
Seriously though,05Venom's E63 was running 12.1x's@116mph+ so all the cars are pretty close.The extra .10sec may/may not have been driver related but being these cars are basically step on the gas&go who knows
04-03-2008, 05:07 AM
#127
MBWorld Fanatic!
04-03-2008, 10:14 PM
#128
Registered User
First off ... unless in 07 mercedes to mess with a limit before breakin ... I honestly don't think its the case. The only way I would believe that this is the case is if Mercedes told everyone to bring thier E63's back within 1k miles.
2nd ... I have the 7 speed in my SLK55 and the loss from crank to rear wheel is only 15.49%. I did multiple dyno runs ... this loss was on a Dynojet.
2nd ... I have the 7 speed in my SLK55 and the loss from crank to rear wheel is only 15.49%. I did multiple dyno runs ... this loss was on a Dynojet.
Mercedes told me to bring my 08 E63 in after 2000 miles for a tune . Tell u the truth it feels like its holding back .
You hear peeps dynoing stock e63's at 420-430hp but i think its the dyno Or they are testing a car that is hot . im going again saturday and im gonna yank the filters and let the car test cool . hope the oil reads in the 60c range or lower . i heard a light rim and tire package will also increase the final numbers too .
Last edited by DAGREEKNYC; 04-03-2008 at 10:17 PM.
04-03-2008, 10:18 PM
#129
MBWorld Fanatic!
04-03-2008, 10:19 PM
#130
Registered User
04-03-2008, 10:21 PM
#131
Registered User
Well thats how BMW treated me . HAd a 2004 745li and everytime the car went there they would dent ,scratch or ruin a rim . at least helms borthers service got some hot ss women working in there
04-08-2008, 11:16 AM
#132
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK 63
Just had my CLK63 dynoed on Sunday
Placed a big fan in the front, 91 oct fuel, dyno mode, manual mode in 4th gear.
Two pulls, both in the 364 range. The air fuel ratio quiet a bid on the lean side
I posted the dyno graph on the CLK section
Here is the link
https://mbworld.org/forums/clk55-amg-clk63-amg-w208-w209/238618-ever-wonder-if-clk63-making-mbs-claimed-475-bhp.html
Placed a big fan in the front, 91 oct fuel, dyno mode, manual mode in 4th gear.
Two pulls, both in the 364 range. The air fuel ratio quiet a bid on the lean side
I posted the dyno graph on the CLK section
Here is the link
https://mbworld.org/forums/clk55-amg-clk63-amg-w208-w209/238618-ever-wonder-if-clk63-making-mbs-claimed-475-bhp.html
04-13-2008, 10:19 PM
#133
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If these guys running dyno tests have 91 octane (I think that was mentioned in this thread) that would cost maybe 5% of the spec'd power?
Altitude hurts too. I live at 3200'/1000m and I know there is 10% lower air pressure here than sea level. My E63 had a much nicer growl at sea level than it does here.
08-26-2008, 02:25 AM
#134
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK500
Wow scary but.....
... but that dyno is basically identical to a C63. Your car has the same tune as a C63, im thinking something is not right here. I point your attention to
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/2008-m...mg-on-the-dyno
as my source on the matter.
If I were you i'd take mine back and ask why you have approximately 336KW at the flywheel....
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/2008-m...mg-on-the-dyno
as my source on the matter.
If I were you i'd take mine back and ask why you have approximately 336KW at the flywheel....
