Let’s get all these issues straightened out with AMG.
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/privatel...read.php?t=475
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/privatel...read.php?t=475
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/privatel...rums/index.php
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
has amg come up with a reason as to why many e55's have lost 60-75hp directly after the secondary air pump recall and ecu flash and what do they intend to do to restore these cars to spec?
that's the polite way to put it. if i was in a bad mood, i'd tell him that we KNOW FOR A FACT based on exclusive conversations with mb that these cars have been limited and want to know what they intend to do to remove the problem.
has amg come up with a reason as to why many e55's have lost 60-75hp directly after the secondary air pump recall and ecu flash and what do they intend to do to restore these cars to spec?
that's the polite way to put it. if i was in a bad mood, i'd tell him that we KNOW FOR A FACT based on exclusive conversations with mb that these cars have been limited and want to know what they intend to do to remove the problem.
has amg come up with a reason as to why many e55's have lost 60-75hp directly after the secondary air pump recall and ecu flash and what do they intend to do to restore these cars to spec?
that's the polite way to put it. if i was in a bad mood, i'd tell him that we KNOW FOR A FACT based on exclusive conversations with mb that these cars have been limited and want to know what they intend to do to remove the problem.
Not good for us 55 guys and....
AMG's engine production advised us this week that the initial 6.3 AMG V-8s produced and bench tested are delivering the 507 horsepower (U.S.) at the flywheel as specified.
We are trying to replicate the conditions under which U.S. owners are achieving their results. There are several important factors including fuel type and quality / octane, temperature - both ambient and engine operating, relative humidity and the like. AMG will be testing under a variety of conditions using complete vehicles.
More to come on this topic.
Not looking too well for 63 owners either...He did say more to come though.They either read the thread here or the calls have been coming in already.
pretty much just what i expected.
You guys bashed me when I tried to give you feedback, but all you want to hear is confirmation of a conspiracy, which will never happen.
If you want MB to address whatever issues you think or are really having, then be methodical and they will respond in kind. This is exactly like playing poker with a bunch of people that show you their cards. Even I could sit back and preempt your every move.
Anyhow, go ahead and flame some more. Maybe it will help your position.
Note one thing on the E55 question (since I could give a rat's ans about the E63), he didn't play dumb. He said he was not aware of "any modifications that directly impacts the E55 AMG's standard horsepower". Two key words. standard (i.e. unmodified) and horsepower (not curve or TQ). Now, take the majority of problem kids that DO have mods out of the equation and what do you end up with? A small population that still claims to be stock and affected. Does that mean they are lying? No, it means they have not built much of a case. Just crying isn't going to help. Neither is diving under the tuner bus.
Summary:
Make a hypothesis
Test that hypothesis
you end up with a theory that you can validate.
How, you ask? Simple do a comparison dyno between your stock "affected" car and a stock 'unaffected" car. Notice how such a study would negate all of the arguments over relative conditions.
The 63's HP debate will get a response from AMG,might not be an answer that will satisfy the owners but it will somehow explain why the car gets low rwhp.I see nothing but complaints coming from the owners,and I dont blame them.
You guys bashed me when I tried to give you feedback, but all you want to hear is confirmation of a conspiracy, which will never happen.
If you want MB to address whatever issues you think or are really having, then be methodical and they will respond in kind. This is exactly like playing poker with a bunch of people that show you their cards. Even I could sit back and preempt your every move.
Anyhow, go ahead and flame some more. Maybe it will help your position.
Note one thing on the E55 question (since I could give a rat's ans about the E63), he didn't play dumb. He said he was not aware of "any modifications that directly impacts the E55 AMG's standard horsepower". Two key words. standard (i.e. unmodified) and horsepower (not curve or TQ). Now, take the majority of problem kids that DO have mods out of the equation and what do you end up with? A small population that still claims to be stock and affected. Does that mean they are lying? No, it means they have not built much of a case. Just crying isn't going to help. Neither is diving under the tuner bus.
Summary:
Make a hypothesis
Test that hypothesis
you end up with a theory that you can validate.
How, you ask? Simple do a comparison dyno between your stock "affected" car and a stock 'unaffected" car. Notice how such a study would negate all of the arguments over relative conditions.
i'm sure rob is a great guy but he is either uninformed or has a gag order. the problem has been substantiated in no uncertain terms.
for the rest of your argument, you have no idea what you're talking about or what kind of case we have. what gets posted here is only the tip of the iceberg. to think we don't have dyno proof of the loss of hp AND tq and to think that it hasn't been brought to the attention of mb goes to show that you have no idea. your "simple" solution has been done, it's what helped me get most of my hp and tq back with replacement parts...but it didn't get us to the root of our problem.
our problem is that mb has altered our cars, is purposefully ignoring us, and hoping we will go away. their problem is that we have this forum.
Last edited by chiromikey; Sep 20, 2006 at 11:54 PM.
You guys bashed me when I tried to give you feedback, but all you want to hear is confirmation of a conspiracy, which will never happen.
If you want MB to address whatever issues you think or are really having, then be methodical and they will respond in kind. This is exactly like playing poker with a bunch of people that show you their cards. Even I could sit back and preempt your every move.
Anyhow, go ahead and flame some more. Maybe it will help your position.
Note one thing on the E55 question (since I could give a rat's ans about the E63), he didn't play dumb. He said he was not aware of "any modifications that directly impacts the E55 AMG's standard horsepower". Two key words. standard (i.e. unmodified) and horsepower (not curve or TQ). Now, take the majority of problem kids that DO have mods out of the equation and what do you end up with? A small population that still claims to be stock and affected. Does that mean they are lying? No, it means they have not built much of a case. Just crying isn't going to help. Neither is diving under the tuner bus.
Summary:
Make a hypothesis
Test that hypothesis
you end up with a theory that you can validate.
How, you ask? Simple do a comparison dyno between your stock "affected" car and a stock 'unaffected" car. Notice how such a study would negate all of the arguments over relative conditions.
i'm sure rob is a great guy but he is either uninformed or has a gag order. the problem has been substantiated in no uncertain terms.
for the rest of your argument, you have no idea what you're talking about or what kind of case we have. what gets posted here is only the tip of the iceberg. to think we don't have dyno proof of the loss of hp AND tq and to think that it hasn't been brought to the attention of mb goes to show that you have no idea. your "simple" solution has been done, it's what helped me get most of my hp and tq back with replacement parts...but it didn't get us to the root of our problem.
our problem is that mb has altered our cars, is purposefully ignoring us, and hoping we will go away. their problem is that we have this forum.


