Just Spoke With ASP About Pulley Upgrade
Wasn't the dyno graph in the above post linked were before and after install of ASP pulley, if so it showed gained of whopping 50rwhp. But to be conservative we know by raising the boost w/o ecu shall net at least 30-35rwhp gain. Not bad for $895 price.
Wayne
- Inner hub that mounts to the crankshaft
- Rubber band that does the dampening
- Outter ribbed pulley that drives the accessories belt
On AMG Kompressor motors crankshaft damper drives the kompressor, which means that the rubber band has to support close to 100HP that it takes to spin the kompressor to redline.
A number of companies, including ASP, modify factory damper by machining away outter pulley and pressing on or welding on (ASP) a bigger diameter ring in order to increase compressor RPMs and thus increase the boost. Which also increases the load on the rubber band.
There have been a number of failures on this and other MB forums as well as other experiences from other users of other makes that had use this method to create larger pulley. Some failures have been very dramatic with extensive damage to the radiator and front engine cover. Some have were caught, due to excessive noise and did minor damage.
Now there have been some that lasted for a number of years without a problem. Since they are made on individual basis the quality of work is dependent on the skill and knowledge of who is doing the work. So far it has been very incosistent.
There have also been failures of stock, unmodified, dampers with rubber band separating and launching outter ring through the radiator, usually on high mileage cars.
Take your own chances.
Since both stock and aftermarket outter main crank pulley (that drives the compressor) are both 2pc pressed onto stock main inner pulley, I am assuming as long as stock diameter dampener ring were retained longetivity shouldn't be sacraficed.
However, now there's also another issue if the factory 2pc pullies were 'dynamicaly balanced' in respective to their weight, then techincally speaking putting on the aftermarket pulley might ruin the balancing on the pulley, then everyone that put on the aftermarket pulley should send their main inner pullies out for balancing with the aftermarket outter pullies.
Wayne
- Inner hub that mounts to the crankshaft
- Rubber band that does the dampening
- Outter ribbed pulley that drives the accessories belt
On AMG Kompressor motors crankshaft damper drives the kompressor, which means that the rubber band has to support close to 100HP that it takes to spin the kompressor to redline.
A number of companies, including ASP, modify factory damper by machining away outter pulley and pressing on or welding on (ASP) a bigger diameter ring in order to increase compressor RPMs and thus increase the boost. Which also increases the load on the rubber band.
There have been a number of failures on this and other MB forums as well as other experiences from other users of other makes that had use this method to create larger pulley. Some failures have been very dramatic with extensive damage to the radiator and front engine cover. Some have were caught, due to excessive noise and did minor damage.
Now there have been some that lasted for a number of years without a problem. Since they are made on individual basis the quality of work is dependent on the skill and knowledge of who is doing the work. So far it has been very incosistent.
There have also been failures of stock, unmodified, dampers with rubber band separating and launching outter ring through the radiator, usually on high mileage cars.
Take your own chances.
But then again there has also been a reported failure of the one piece design also.
The rubber ring on the the rear of the balancer is for dampening but the rubber ring on the crank pulley also serves another purpose. It helps with the load on the snout of the crank caused by the supercharger.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
- Inner hub that mounts to the crankshaft
- Rubber band that does the dampening
- Outter ribbed pulley that drives the accessories belt
On AMG Kompressor motors crankshaft damper drives the kompressor, which means that the rubber band has to support close to 100HP that it takes to spin the kompressor to redline.
A number of companies, including ASP, modify factory damper by machining away outter pulley and pressing on or welding on (ASP) a bigger diameter ring in order to increase compressor RPMs and thus increase the boost. Which also increases the load on the rubber band.
There have been a number of failures on this and other MB forums as well as other experiences from other users of other makes that had use this method to create larger pulley. Some failures have been very dramatic with extensive damage to the radiator and front engine cover. Some have were caught, due to excessive noise and did minor damage.
Now there have been some that lasted for a number of years without a problem. Since they are made on individual basis the quality of work is dependent on the skill and knowledge of who is doing the work. So far it has been very incosistent.
There have also been failures of stock, unmodified, dampers with rubber band separating and launching outter ring through the radiator, usually on high mileage cars.
Take your own chances.

One has vibration/harmonic issues.
One has inner ring rubber issues.
Pick your poison carefully... one just cost more.
MachC5
One has vibration/harmonic issues.
One has inner ring rubber issues.
Pick your poison carefully... one just cost more
www.evosport.com
Vadim, so you would recommend the EVO one over any other ones on the market correct?
Wayne
this is the only thread i've ever heard hearsay of a problem so imho, you guys might be making too much about the whole thing.
this is the only thread i've ever heard hearsay of a problem so imho, you guys might be making too much about the whole thing.
www.evosport.com
The stock MB balancer was designed for the engines rpm range, horsepower and supercharger. A better balancer would typically only be needed when our motors begin to spin past 7500 or if the engines horsepower increases substantially.
There is no arguing that the high performance dampeners are stronger ,hence they carry sfi approval. But their dampening advantage over a well designed stock balancer is always being debated back and forth.
Vadim, so you would recommend the EVO one over any other ones on the market correct?
Wayne
https://mbworld.org/forums/showpost....0&postcount=12
Go to evosport's site for their setup.




Too much work today...tommorow my friend