Dragstrip speed vs real world street speed
I think its easy to confuse these 2 types of speed...ie to focus on the very best times achieved at a dragstrip with a burnout and extrapolate that mean the car is equally fast on the road or at a typical stoplight.
While the best numbers he posted at the track are certainly very impressive, I wonder what would happen 8 out of 10 times if his stock E55 rolled up to a spontaneous stoplight race with a stock E63 without a "HUGE burnout" (his words).
I suspect that the stock E63 would win this kind of race 8 out of 10 times.
I could be wrong: Thoughts? Opinions? Flames?
ETA's are good, if you plan to to brag about times slips.
Trap speed if you want to know who is faster from a freeway roll.
Most of the time (disclaimer) the higher trap speed will win the highway or freeway pulls.
So far the E63 has not shown a consistent higher trap speed on the 1/4 mile track. From the 2 head to head test in Florida and Cali, the 63 performed equally to the 55.
The 7 speed auto has 2 more gears that are not really helping as much as we thought. I still believe from a roll the 63 will pull the 55 after the 100 mark, but under 100 it would be up to the driver.
my stock 55 ran a 12.6sec 1/4 mile on d/r. and on the street my mates 55 was as quick as mine.
we tried his 55 against me in the 63 and the 63 won every race comprehesively(we posted the video on the froum).
we tried from stand still
rolling @ low revs
rolling @ high revs
100km/h up
the 63 is a much superior car allround in stock form.
a pully;ecu;exhaust;etc on a 55 thats another ball game
this is what he said "you would pull away a about a carlength and just stay there"
these were from about60 to 110+
They're waiting for their motors to "loosen up"
Trending Topics
Are examples in the street I am forgetting where the stock E55 was faster than the stock E63? It would certainly not surprise me.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Here is a comparison of the E55 vs E63 on dragtimes.com:
http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21
Here is a comparison of the E55 vs E63 on dragtimes.com:
http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21
You offer compelling evidence that the E55 is quicker at the dragstrip (some stock & some not). Point noted. I offered 3 compelling examples of street comparisons where the stock E63 came out ahead. I assume you have no contrary evidence or you would have offered it.
I think this is an interesting subject, i.e. trying to figure out how these cars stack up against each other both on and off the dragstrip. To you, any discussion other than which car is faster down a 1/4 mile track after a huge burnout may be "blah, blah, blah".
Here is a comparison of the E55 vs E63 on dragtimes.com:
http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21
Last edited by chiromikey; Nov 8, 2006 at 06:35 PM.




As it stands, the E55 is the quicker car from a dig. I'm not saying that the E63 doesn't have merit or that it would win in certain circumstances. However, I would not consider a few street runs as evidence that the E63 is the quicker car.
i live in the houston area and would enjoy meeting up with some 63's anytime...on the street or strip...anybody want to play with the slower 55...let me know?
john
I'm in the Memphis area and also bone stock and would be glad to meet up with a 63 owner if we could find a safe place for testing.
As it stands, the E55 is the quicker car from a dig. I'm not saying that the E63 doesn't have merit or that it would win in certain circumstances. However, I would not consider a few street runs as evidence that the E63 is the quicker car.
Impromptu encounters on the street, and even prearranged races leave too many variables to be considered a reasonable method by which to compare the performance of the 55 and 63. Reaction time, traction, etc. all play a role.
In reality, a few tenths and at the tree and a bit of tire spin can make the difference between a 13.0 car winning a race and a low to mid-12 second car winning the race.
I wouldn't put an ounce of stock in these "street encounter" stories. As of now, IMO, the 55 is still the faster car. It is also still the easier car to mod. And finally, it is a proven performer.
S.
It simply made me wonder whether this phenomenon could explain why there were 3 separate reports (see below) where owners reported that multiple street tests they performed on their own vehicles (not random racers) showed the stock E63 to be faster than the stock E55.
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/161712-confirmed-e63-faster-than-e55.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/167474-tested-e63-m5-run-e63-vs-e55.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=169773
I am simply asking the question: Is it possible that the E55 is faster on the track with a pre-race burnout, and the E63 is faster at a stoplight race without a pre-race burnout? Without a burnout, maybe the results change since the tires dont lay down the torque as well for the E55.
It is disappointing that at this point there have not been more 1/4 mile times from owners of the E63. Of course, there was a 12.5 second time listed by Car and Driver for the E63 wagon. The only other 1/4 mile time I know of (mine) is not a good reference point because of the universally poor times on the slippery track.
Blah, blah, blah.
Last edited by E63AMG; Nov 9, 2006 at 12:51 AM.
any report on what stock 55's were doing that weekend?
Last edited by chiromikey; Nov 9, 2006 at 12:23 AM.
I'd be lying if I said I haven't made my fair share of passes on the street, both impromptu and "organized", but 160mph...that's just ridiculous.
S.
I agree.
E63AMG - I'm not sure what the point of the thread really is, other than to prove to yourself that you made the right decision choosing to buy a 63 and sell your 55. I think it's been proven that, best case (for the 63 owners), the 63 and 55 are equal to each other in acceleration with the 63 trailing slightly due to the 55 rolling out of the hole harder.
Overall, it seems like the 63 is an improvement over the 55 - BUT, if you're into racing from a dig, the 55 is still king. The clocks can't be fudged, fooled or misinterpreted.



