juicee63

Maybe we should wait for Friday and Saturdays results?

Phil , lets talk about Colorado and Golf instead

At least a 63 is finally on page 1

http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21

MB_Forever

Enjoy........

MB_Forever

Honostly, this is the perfect statement for this discussion. I agree with you 100% on this one.

Stock vs Stock, both cars are very close in performance. The E55 maybe at most 0.1 to 0.2 faster (on average) in 1/4 mile, but E63 is probably 0.1 to 0.2 faster in 1/2 mile.

At Atco, when both cars ran on the same track and same day, Oldgixxer's E63 ran a best of 12.1 and Enzom's E55 ran a best of 11.9. However, Enzom's car has PS2 tires instead of stock Conti's and wider width than stock in the rear (275). I believe if Oldgixxer moves to PS2 instead of continentals and maybe a little wider as well, then he'll definately break into the 11's also.

But once the E55 is modified, bye bye 63. So, it all depends on what you want.

oldgixxer

Really??You sure 'bout that?

Juicee,maybe we should tell that to the guy on Dragtimes you posted a link to

deaguero

Hey Old Gixxer: maybe your memory is failing you or maybe you just never were on this forum when the original E55's were posting numbers as I stated were the norm for the E55's. Like I said in my post the E63 is a great car but just dont assume because you weren't here for these numbers that they never happened. If you want to start something with me send me a PM oldgixxer!

oldgixxer

My my my,touchy arent we?
Are you seriously issuing me an "Internet Toughguy Challenge?"
PM you&then what,set up a fistfight?
Get real man,lighten up a bit,or do you really want to get personal as your post sounds?Im replying to a statement you just made.I didnt make it YOU DID.
You said "Many "stock" E55's were either in the high 11's or low 12's for the 1/4 mile and no E63 has matched that"
I matched it,whats the F'in problem???????????????

deaguero

Who mentioned fistfight old gixxer? You must be fantisizing in your napping!
You haven't matched the 11's that some of the E55's have done have you?
I agree, you are the fastest E63 that I am aware of but not in the 11's old gixxer, Where did you get that?
Go back to your "typical NY pushy attitude hole" and back to sleep old gixxer.

ItalianStallion

.....

oldgixxer

Now we resort to name calling?Are you 16yrs old?

Please enlighten me as to the EXACT meaning of your comment:"If you want to start something with me send me a PM oldgixxer!" as I'd love to know where you intend to go with this.....Sounds very aggressive if you ask me.

Your comment said high 11's or low 12's. I have the low 12's,I never said nor claimed to run a 11.WTF is your malfunction?You throw a statement out & somebody calls you on it with facts&you get you panties in a ruffle?

And since you keep saying I'm "napping",is that your intelligent twist on my screen name OLDgixxer?
Maybe do a search for "oldgixxer" in the off topic forum&see a pic of how old&tired I am.

You have no idea as to how immature&idiotic your dim witted,antagonistic replies to me are.Whatever your problem is,take it somewhere else as your caustic inflammatory remarks are not welcome here

MB_Forever

Guys, lets calm down and put this in perspective a bit. Stock vs Stock, both cars are within 0.1 to 0.2 from each other. That has been confirmed by AMGFEST06 and others. Here are some personal data, I've collected from going to the track events.......

At California Speedway, Famoso, and Sacramento, all the stock E55s and E63s that ran side by side scored almost identical numbers.....

At Fontana (same day runs for both cars):
================================
Best Stock E55 run: 12.9 @ 107 mph
Best Stock E63 run: 12.7 @ 112 mph

At Famoso (also same day runs)
========================
It was a 98 F, very humid, and high DA.
Best Stock E55 run (with filters): 13.1 @ 106 mph
Best Stock E63 run (stock filters): 12.9 @ 110 mph
and yes, the E55 had just replaced the IC pump a month prior to the event.

At Sacramento (same day runs for both cars):
===================================
Best Stock E55 run: 12.25 @ 117 mph
Best Stock E63 run: 12.54 @ 114 mph

At Atco (same day runs for both cars):
=============================
Best Stock E55 run: 11.9 @ 118 mph (with PS2 and wider tires)
Best Stock E63 run: 12.1 @ 117 mph

Now if you take averages of all runs in each event, the times become even closer and closer.

But again, once the E55 goes modified, the E55 kills the E63.

oldgixxer

MBForever,this has already gone beyond who's faster as this genlteman has an axe to grind with me personally from his extremely bold&brave statements

deaguero

You started this with your first post if you look back! You are a typical internet mindless poster saying anything you want and when someone challenges you, you get "your" panties in a ruffle and start name calling.

I could care less about your 1/4 mile times. you are really a self centered opinionated person so end of response since you are hopeless simple minded person with a negative square root of 3 for an IQ!

ItalianStallion

"DIE ROB DIE! E55 FTMFW! YEAH!!! E63's SUCK! My torque kills you! 11.8 beats your 12.1! Mwahahahaha!!!"

Is that what Daguera really meant?

oldgixxer

Go back to the golf course oldman&work on yer gut

And I must be doing something right with my IQ of 3,cuz I managed to infuriate a highly intelligent California boy w my pushy NY attitude,and I did it before I had to climb back in my hole.
Ok,climbing back in my hole now,by sweetiepie

Do ya really think you'd smack me in the head like the emoticons doing in your last post?

Carl Lassiter

From limited seat time the suspension and brakes on the 63 are a good improvement as are the looks. 7-speed likely helps up top but the ratios should be more tuned towrds performance. However, the only one that would hand an M5 its *** is a modded 55k. Otherwise it's as close as to make no difference and a case of different strokes for different folks.

Carl Lassiter

OldGixxer is a bodybuilder and former doorman in NJ. He's a also a valuable contributor to the forum. Not getting involved just giving you the heads up.

oldgixxer

Thankyou Carl,that was very nice of you.

deaguero

Totally emotional & hopeless. Promise this is the last post oldgixxer!

ItalianStallion

I've also heard that he's a gun-toting maniac with a thirst for blood and a twitchy trigger finger.

The funniest part of this whole argument is that oldgixxer didn't say anything wrong

I love these discussions

Jakpro1

Revlovers.com finally put this thing to bed.

Great video of the CLS55 and 63 BOTH STOCK going at it.

Gotta register to see the video, but here ya go.

Screen shots below.

oldgixxer

Thankyou!

Now,I'm BEGGING you deaguero,please come smack some sense into me.Don't back down now...How bout I even pay for your plane ticket to come to NY& do it?Please,pretty PLEASE??I'll even pick you up at the airport in THE FASTEST&QUICKEST E63
Bring it on old man

MB_Forever

Carl Lassiter, I don't think that is a good way of putting it, as it can get easily misconstrued. Phil (deaguero) has also been a member of this forum for a long time. He also contributed a lot, and he is a very well respected and loved member by many.

I'm not saying who is mistaken here, but just clarifying that both are good members here. I'm not sure what happened, but suddenly the conversation aggressive and off topic

oldgixxer

I can tell you exactly what happened here:
-deaguermo said no 63's have run hi 11's low 12's.When I replied "are you sure" his reply was interpreted as sarcastic&inflammatory&if I wanted to "start something to PM him"...Hey Old Gixxer: maybe your memory is failing you or maybe you just never were on this forum when the original E55's were posting numbers as I stated were the norm for the E55's. Like I said in my post the E63 is a great car but just dont assume because you weren't here for these numbers that they never happened. If you want to start something with me send me a PM oldgixxer

So,please tell me what I did to warrant this ridiculous childlike response.
If I'm in the wrong,I will gladly apologize.However,as somebody already mentioned I said nothing wrong&this tool has a serious *** problem that needs to be adjusted pronto

PS-I'm done with this high school B.S. as I dont want to get banned cuz Ireally do love this site.
You wanna come smack me like your little characters are doing then PM me&I'll overnite you a 1st class ticket to Stewart Airport;if not leave it bro

juicee63

could it be that black cars are better from a dig than silver ones??And silver cars are faster from a roll? WOOHOO JAKPRO, thanks for the screen shots that makes sense kinda.

Thanks for the vid

deaguero

If I'm wrong I'll apologize too! End of posts