What engine mods are necessary and cost involved to get the E55...
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Porsche 996 (300Hp) Powered Boxster/ Audi A6 Station Wagon
What engine mods are necessary and cost involved to get the E55...
neck by neck in accelaration till + 124Mph/200Kph with an M5?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 E55 Evosport I & II; VRP H/E
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
From a dig, you'll be neck and neck with an M5 stock to stock. Around the 1/4 mile mark, M5 will start to pull away.
The 1,325,234 videos that we have seen are always with one car modified on one side or the other and never stock to stock.
If you are planning on taking on an M, make sure you have some nice sticky tires (PS2's minimum) and MAKE IT FROM A DIG. If you do the 3 honk from a roll, it's not in your favor.
Let her put down her torque from the hole and she'll make you a happy man.
That actually brings on a good question. Wonder what mods a guy could add SPECIFICALLY to increase top end on our cars. We are always looking to improve 1/4 times, but wonder what we could do if we only wanted to boost the top end.
The 1,325,234 videos that we have seen are always with one car modified on one side or the other and never stock to stock.
If you are planning on taking on an M, make sure you have some nice sticky tires (PS2's minimum) and MAKE IT FROM A DIG. If you do the 3 honk from a roll, it's not in your favor.
Let her put down her torque from the hole and she'll make you a happy man.
That actually brings on a good question. Wonder what mods a guy could add SPECIFICALLY to increase top end on our cars. We are always looking to improve 1/4 times, but wonder what we could do if we only wanted to boost the top end.
#6
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 E63
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
From what I have seen, a stock E55 should be about even with an E60 M5. Now if you add our ECU and/or ECU & pulley.......the E55 will walk away!
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
but why would you want anything past the 1/4 mile? i get to 120+ in the 1/4 anything faster than that on the streets and you are lookin at serious trouble. so for real life racing it probably the person that can get from 0-60 or 70mph.
it would be different if i lived near a autoban but i live in the peoples republic of kalifornia and im not usally crusing around a empty air strip.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
If you plot geared rwhp vs road speed you will get a good idea of what I am getting at.
#10
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,394
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2015 S212
Just get better tires, so that you can put the power down instead of spinning in place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9VNFIEVnS0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9VNFIEVnS0
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 EuroElites E55
Just get better tires, so that you can put the power down instead of spinning in place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9VNFIEVnS0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9VNFIEVnS0
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well you are now fighting gearing more than power ... heatsoak is BS on our cars as an excuse to lose ag the M's at 120+ speeds. As speed rises, in my opinion, its 95% gearing ... so I would say start with a 2.82 and mbe go to a 3.02 ... but you will run out of revs if you want to get above 200mph ... 2.82 looks like the best we can do - but we still stay 2 gears short .. so you need a good lump extra power to overcome the SMG's better leverage.. how much ?? I thought of a way to calc this and will try and give it a crack tomorrow...
If you plot geared rwhp vs road speed you will get a good idea of what I am getting at.
If you plot geared rwhp vs road speed you will get a good idea of what I am getting at.
#15
Germany
I say we all take our cars and move to Germany so we can boost every M5 owner's ego. Just kidding M5 owners.........if you can't prove something in a 1/4 mile, forget about it. Who cares what car wins to 180+! One of these days we're going to see a video of someone running 150+ blowing a tire and killing themselves and possibly others. Let's keep the racing at the track. Be safe.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
$100 Johnson Pump
and custom IC HE (under $800)
dont believe me.. (search Cali Speedway event 9/21/2007) and ask JRocket about it.
The TB will be icing on the cake.. you won't need it.
Last edited by TopGun32; 09-26-2007 at 04:06 PM.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ha! yeah ... I feel like this ![BeatDeatHorse](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beatdeadhorse5.gif)
The worst part about those valves is that Wet are purposefully vague about them ... if its defending their intelectual property or perhaps other reasons we dont know.... but I am still pressing them to give me a better understanding of how they use them ... I think it makes the tuning of the ECU easier for them somehow. Think they use the fan to get more clean air to the lambda sensor ... then they use this somehow via ECU??? yeah I dont get it either... thats kind of all I have gathered. These valves add nothing to hp on their own... it has to be in conjunction with ECU - which is what they said.
ECU prog is in - will run car in this w/e and see where I am at - will strap in the Autoengenuity and see what sparks fly....
At end of day if I can trap ~120ish , I'll be happy!!
![BeatDeatHorse](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beatdeadhorse5.gif)
The worst part about those valves is that Wet are purposefully vague about them ... if its defending their intelectual property or perhaps other reasons we dont know.... but I am still pressing them to give me a better understanding of how they use them ... I think it makes the tuning of the ECU easier for them somehow. Think they use the fan to get more clean air to the lambda sensor ... then they use this somehow via ECU??? yeah I dont get it either... thats kind of all I have gathered. These valves add nothing to hp on their own... it has to be in conjunction with ECU - which is what they said.
ECU prog is in - will run car in this w/e and see where I am at - will strap in the Autoengenuity and see what sparks fly....
At end of day if I can trap ~120ish , I'll be happy!!
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
i recall reading that most m5 guys only used 7th for fuel economy, think it was 3rd and 6th that were the strong pulling ones according to some.
I have not seen many stock races as mostly people are modded... or have old pumps that fail and do not know about it.
I am not saying the M can not win, but lots of conflicting data has been shown
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
I still have to see an E beat an M from 120+ roll ... have not seen any evidence of that.
Any guru's there to help me with some calc's if I want to go from flywheel hp to road torque applied translating through the gearing its simple multiplication right?
i.e. flywheel torque x gearing x diff ratio = rwt, asumming no losses?
Any guru's there to help me with some calc's if I want to go from flywheel hp to road torque applied translating through the gearing its simple multiplication right?
i.e. flywheel torque x gearing x diff ratio = rwt, asumming no losses?
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well using this theorertical formula (which requires some vetting) I get a somewhat surprising result in one resopect and not that surprising in another....
So bascially I plot engine rpm vs road speed if you change up at redline everytime... I then compute the rwp applied to the road at that speed, so ineffect taking teh gearing of the cars into account... there is proabbly a much easier way of doing this but anyhow ...
The result is
1st M5, alsmost entirely across the road speeds...
2nd E63 v close to M5 initially and then falling off 3rd - 4th
3rd E55 well this was the surprise ... its substantially below both almost for the entire road speed spectrum...
This is surprising since in real life this is not what we are seeing ...
What am I missing ? Chart is excel ... how do I post it?
So bascially I plot engine rpm vs road speed if you change up at redline everytime... I then compute the rwp applied to the road at that speed, so ineffect taking teh gearing of the cars into account... there is proabbly a much easier way of doing this but anyhow ...
The result is
1st M5, alsmost entirely across the road speeds...
2nd E63 v close to M5 initially and then falling off 3rd - 4th
3rd E55 well this was the surprise ... its substantially below both almost for the entire road speed spectrum...
This is surprising since in real life this is not what we are seeing ...
What am I missing ? Chart is excel ... how do I post it?
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
E55 kleemenn k4 lost at high speeds! and excuses was gearing..... yet sleeper just showed other wise and whats more the M was modded and not stock like the M6 in the k4 vid.
so please enlighten me on how this happened?
many people also applied the laws of physics and said gearing can not out way 100 + odd hp difference like that.
Also i believe it is not as simple as, if you have this gear ration you win, but i know nothing about these things so i will sit and read and learn i hope
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Searching and learning is the key! keep it up m interested to find out to
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by Zod; 09-27-2007 at 07:23 AM.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well using this theorertical formula (which requires some vetting) I get a somewhat surprising result in one resopect and not that surprising in another....
So bascially I plot engine rpm vs road speed if you change up at redline everytime... I then compute the rwp applied to the road at that speed, so ineffect taking teh gearing of the cars into account... there is proabbly a much easier way of doing this but anyhow ...
The result is
1st M5, alsmost entirely across the road speeds...
2nd E63 v close to M5 initially and then falling off 3rd - 4th
3rd E55 well this was the surprise ... its substantially below both almost for the entire road speed spectrum...
This is surprising since in real life this is not what we are seeing ...
What am I missing ? Chart is excel ... how do I post it?
So bascially I plot engine rpm vs road speed if you change up at redline everytime... I then compute the rwp applied to the road at that speed, so ineffect taking teh gearing of the cars into account... there is proabbly a much easier way of doing this but anyhow ...
The result is
1st M5, alsmost entirely across the road speeds...
2nd E63 v close to M5 initially and then falling off 3rd - 4th
3rd E55 well this was the surprise ... its substantially below both almost for the entire road speed spectrum...
This is surprising since in real life this is not what we are seeing ...
What am I missing ? Chart is excel ... how do I post it?
Hope that helps