What is the disadvantage of AWD?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 6
300ce
What is the disadvantage of AWD?
........there is a long standing joke about Immodium and Immodium AD. The Imoodium Ad works faster. So why would anyone want the slower one?
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,342
Likes: 11
From: PA
S600, GL450, GLC 43
........there is a long standing joke about Immodium and Immodium AD. The Imoodium Ad works faster. So why would anyone want the slower one?
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
See yeah
Merry Christmas
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 6
300ce
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Cary, IL
2003 CL55 Kompressor Horizon Blue Metallic
........there is a long standing joke about Immodium and Immodium AD. The Imoodium Ad works faster. So why would anyone want the slower one?
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
.......HP wars are so out of hand now, that traction is becoming the limiting factor. Is there some disadvantage of an AWD system that prevents car manufactures from having only AWD in their high HP cars? Looks like Nissan took advantage of all the things we talk talk about in this forum to build their apparently astonishing new GTR. Twin turbo, AWD, launch control to prevent wheel spin. MB still builds 600HP cars without even an LSD. So why take the Immodium if Immodium AD is available?
Ted
My experience with AWD "performance" cars is that they are a blast in wet and snow conditions, but understeering pigs in the dry. They feel like understeering pigs when even driven lightly in the dry. They drive nice in wet and snow because I modify my driving style to what would be considered bad practices in the dry.
So, in general, I also chalk this up to the weight. This is a relative thing (my CL isn't a lightweight). They also seem to move the drivetrain stress to the clutch/torque convertor and transmission. I'm certain there will be a ton of recalls because of drivetrain problems with the GTR. The net is that a vicious circle is created of beefing up the drivetrain (adding weight), then having more drivetrain problems because more weight is added.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,704
Likes: 28
From: 20854
new balance
weight + drivetrain loss.....examples are the original RS6 with 500hp that could barely run low 13's, Gallardos and Murcis are relatively slow but come on light platforms, you can overcome these losses by adding more HP
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Likes: 207
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
I'll start by saying I know I'm being subjective and I should keep an open opinion about the GTR.
My experience with AWD "performance" cars is that they are a blast in wet and snow conditions, but understeering pigs in the dry. They feel like understeering pigs when even driven lightly in the dry. They drive nice in wet and snow because I modify my driving style to what would be considered bad practices in the dry.
So, in general, I also chalk this up to the weight. This is a relative thing (my CL isn't a lightweight). They also seem to move the drivetrain stress to the clutch/torque convertor and transmission. I'm certain there will be a ton of recalls because of drivetrain problems with the GTR. The net is that a vicious circle is created of beefing up the drivetrain (adding weight), then having more drivetrain problems because more weight is added.
My experience with AWD "performance" cars is that they are a blast in wet and snow conditions, but understeering pigs in the dry. They feel like understeering pigs when even driven lightly in the dry. They drive nice in wet and snow because I modify my driving style to what would be considered bad practices in the dry.
So, in general, I also chalk this up to the weight. This is a relative thing (my CL isn't a lightweight). They also seem to move the drivetrain stress to the clutch/torque convertor and transmission. I'm certain there will be a ton of recalls because of drivetrain problems with the GTR. The net is that a vicious circle is created of beefing up the drivetrain (adding weight), then having more drivetrain problems because more weight is added.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 6
300ce
......all good points. In summary the consensus is that AWD results in more drive train loss and more weight. I wonder at what point they will become an absolute requirement. What good will the rumored furure V8TT 63 be with an open diff and no AWD? I notice that Kleemann chose the ML63 for their 800HP TT project. I don't think it is an accident.
Ted
Ted
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 19
From: London, UK
No longer stock '06 E55, A3 3.2 Quattro, GLE 400d, R107 280SL, Golf Polo
"One day all cars will be made this way..."
Lets face it ... whats the point of having a +700hp super car when u can't get the power down?
Lets face it ... whats the point of having a +700hp super car when u can't get the power down?
Last edited by stevebez; Dec 20, 2007 at 07:52 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Central New Jersey
CLK63 Black, E350 Wagon, Supercharged Denali, Lotus Elise, Tesla Model 3 Dual-Motor.
Guys don't forget about the great handling AWD little 4-cylinder Mitsubishi EVO that has to be one of the best bangs for the buck. The vehicle cost new is approx $30k then if you want to add $5-7k in mods... you'll be on par with anything that anyone puts out from any factory... and is sold in the USofA.
In 2005 I had looked at the Porches.
and the EVO MR offerings. Was not a real hard decision.
In 2005 I had looked at the Porches.
and the EVO MR offerings. Was not a real hard decision.
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, England
E55 W210
Maybe there's a marketing angle too. Apart from weight, cost, reliability issues there's also branding. Audi is recognised as a 4WD brand but maybe Mercedes-Benz has decided to remain distinctive and not to be seen to follow that route (except where it has traditionally done so), especially in the US market.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Maybe there's a marketing angle too. Apart from weight, cost, reliability issues there's also branding. Audi is recognised as a 4WD brand but maybe Mercedes-Benz has decided to remain distinctive and not to be seen to follow that route (except where it has traditionally done so), especially in the US market.
problem for AWD is they are relatively slow after certain speed.
assuming same weight and same or more hp on a AWD, the RWD ALWAYS
perform a lot better except launching. Launch is the only advantange AWD has, any thing like rolling start or mid end acceleration will get the AWD killed.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
is always weight and drivetrain loss.
problem for AWD is they are relatively slow after certain speed.
assuming same weight and same or more hp on a AWD, the RWD ALWAYS
perform a lot better except launching. Launch is the only advantange AWD has, any thing like rolling start or mid end acceleration will get the AWD killed.
problem for AWD is they are relatively slow after certain speed.
assuming same weight and same or more hp on a AWD, the RWD ALWAYS
perform a lot better except launching. Launch is the only advantange AWD has, any thing like rolling start or mid end acceleration will get the AWD killed.
RWD M3 vs EVO MR Tell me which will be better on a dry surface road race course?
AWD has more advantages than just launching.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
I'm sure cost is a big factor as well. An AWD on a Mercedes will probably cost a lot more than on japanese brands. Not including all the "additional" maintenance headaches that will result from the integration. Combine that with all the "famous" Mercedes maintenance issues that already exist, and things could start to get really bad
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Sure! of course you can always add more hp to the AWD, thats why it has disadvantage. We are talking about AWD disadvantage and you are switching it to the car set up now instead of AWD vs RWD.
same engine in same car the RWD set up will always be faster after launch. especially at higher speed.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
Sure! of course you can always add more hp to the AWD, thats why it has disadvantage. We are talking about AWD disadvantage and you are switching it to the car set up now instead of AWD vs RWD.
same engine in same car the RWD set up will always be faster after launch. especially at higher speed.
same engine in same car the RWD set up will always be faster after launch. especially at higher speed.
Originally Posted by hkpooh
assuming same weight and same or more hp on a AWD, the RWD ALWAYS
perform a lot better except launching. Launch is the only advantange AWD has
perform a lot better except launching. Launch is the only advantange AWD has
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: philadelphia
2005 E55 drowned/ 2011 CTS-v coupe gone/ 2012 E63 PP,LSD finally here
what about fun factor, I was ready to buy a 993 twin turbo back in the day, but then right before I was about to do a deal I got a chance to romp around in a GT2 and loved it, the AWD was great for traction, wet roads and Pikes Peak, but the GT2 was so much more fun, I was buying it to have fun with, the occasional street race and some wild 3a.m. runs, my point is that to me a rwd sports car is just more a drivers' car, I just enjoy getting sideways, but when it's wet or snowy I also enjoy blowing by most people but that's in the wifes' s/c Range Rover sport, again for me the AWD 993 TTwaas great but it took away too much drivers' instinct and required less driving skill and was not nearly as much fun as the rwd GT2,
sorry I kind of strayed off topic but my point is yes AWD gets better traction, is better on wet roads, and is probably better for real high HP cars but a rwd sports car is a drivers' car, I couldn't afford a GT2 so I just bought a 993 C2s widebody car and had the motor built to a 3.8l twin turbo with bigger Garrett turbos(we used ball bearing units which didn't come on factory turbo) huge intercooler, and 30k price tag, car made over 700hp and definately had traction issues but it was fun and challenging, so to me the disadvantage of AWD is fun factor, sorry for the novel,
is how my head feels now
sorry I kind of strayed off topic but my point is yes AWD gets better traction, is better on wet roads, and is probably better for real high HP cars but a rwd sports car is a drivers' car, I couldn't afford a GT2 so I just bought a 993 C2s widebody car and had the motor built to a 3.8l twin turbo with bigger Garrett turbos(we used ball bearing units which didn't come on factory turbo) huge intercooler, and 30k price tag, car made over 700hp and definately had traction issues but it was fun and challenging, so to me the disadvantage of AWD is fun factor, sorry for the novel,
is how my head feels now
Super Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
E55
WIEGHT is the only thing,
If they get a light AWD it will be in all cars. Trust me. My E55 vs AWD 996 turbo in the dry= tough match. In the wet or snow=no match.
Then again look at the AUDI's all the AWD modells, even with huge BHP advantage, are usually much slower than their BMW and MB rivals, but when you see these guy is the wet/Snow they disappear on you.
If they get a light AWD it will be in all cars. Trust me. My E55 vs AWD 996 turbo in the dry= tough match. In the wet or snow=no match.
Then again look at the AUDI's all the AWD modells, even with huge BHP advantage, are usually much slower than their BMW and MB rivals, but when you see these guy is the wet/Snow they disappear on you.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 8
From: Oklahoma City
2015 AMG C63 S
WIEGHT is the only thing,
If they get a light AWD it will be in all cars. Trust me. My E55 vs AWD 996 turbo in the dry= tough match. In the wet or snow=no match.
Then again look at the AUDI's all the AWD modells, even with huge BHP advantage, are usually much slower than their BMW and MB rivals, but when you see these guy is the wet/Snow they disappear on you.
If they get a light AWD it will be in all cars. Trust me. My E55 vs AWD 996 turbo in the dry= tough match. In the wet or snow=no match.
Then again look at the AUDI's all the AWD modells, even with huge BHP advantage, are usually much slower than their BMW and MB rivals, but when you see these guy is the wet/Snow they disappear on you.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,475
Likes: 5
From: City with Tall buildings!
C43/55,2k11 Volvo S60 T6AWD,2k Audi B5 S4,95 Eagle Talon Tsi AWD 500+awhp
