Any update on cams?
#127
MBWorld Fanatic!
since vrp knows the specs of their own cams, i would think they should be able to get a pretty darn close tune for ahmad then.
#128
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
but
while VRP knows the specs of their own cams ... I don't think they have tuned a NA 5.4 motor or one that has been supercharged with VRP cams. Seriously the CLK has been modified a LOT as a result no cookie cutter tune is gonna be perfect. It SHOULD be custom tuned.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
If it was me I would have gotten Kleemann cams on a Kleemann car. On my car I would use Renntech cams(which I would again get another custom tune) or test VRP's only if I got a custom tune for it.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
If it was me I would have gotten Kleemann cams on a Kleemann car. On my car I would use Renntech cams(which I would again get another custom tune) or test VRP's only if I got a custom tune for it.
#129
MBWorld Fanatic!
while VRP knows the specs of their own cams ... I don't think they have tuned a NA 5.4 motor or one that has been supercharged with VRP cams. Seriously the CLK has been modified a LOT as a result no cookie cutter tune is gonna be perfect. It SHOULD be custom tuned.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
If it was me I would have gotten Kleemann cams on a Kleemann car. On my car I would use Renntech cams(which I would again get another custom tune) or test VRP's only if I got a custom tune for it.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
If it was me I would have gotten Kleemann cams on a Kleemann car. On my car I would use Renntech cams(which I would again get another custom tune) or test VRP's only if I got a custom tune for it.
i TOTALLY disagree with having to get locked into one tuner just because you started with some of their parts. if the product performs as promised, you buy the best product/service for the best price...period.
#130
MBWorld Fanatic!
i'm not coming down on vrp and vic knows that! my comment was simply that if they're going to custom tune amgsc's car and his car has basically the same set up as ahmad's car except vrp's cams, all they need to do is make a few adjustments for the specs of their cams and ahmads got a tune to start with. hopefully you can see my point.
i TOTALLY disagree with having to get locked into one tuner just because you started with some of their parts. if the product performs as promised, you buy the best product/service for the best price...period.
i TOTALLY disagree with having to get locked into one tuner just because you started with some of their parts. if the product performs as promised, you buy the best product/service for the best price...period.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#131
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
At the same time you must have a tuner that is willing to tune your car with other parts on it. Also warranty their parts even though its a mix and match. IMHO thats the hard part.
#132
MBWorld Fanatic!
while VRP knows the specs of their own cams ... I don't think they have tuned a NA 5.4 motor or one that has been supercharged with VRP cams. Seriously the CLK has been modified a LOT as a result no cookie cutter tune is gonna be perfect. It SHOULD be custom tuned.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
Give VRP a break.
My only take on this would have been VRP stating that they havent tested in that configuration and can't guarantee a RWHP benefit without a custom tune.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Originally Posted by SLK55R
If it was me I would have gotten Kleemann cams on a Kleemann car. On my car I would use Renntech cams(which I would again get another custom tune) or test VRP's only if I got a custom tune for it.
Last edited by ProjectC55; 06-23-2008 at 10:48 PM.
#133
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
Dude,cams are cams regardless of who makes them. The difference would be whether the cams are made for F/I or not based on overlap and lift.. If the cams don't have too much overlap they can generally be used on any stck F/I,F/I kit ,Renntech or Kleemann, no matter who makes the cams. That goes for the programming as well.
Btw I don't have a single VRUS product ... so I have no reason to stand up for them.
#134
MBWorld Fanatic!
Nice how my 5.5L motor works in my C43 when the original motor was a 4.3L motor. No SW upgrade was needed at all even though I had it done(Superchips),computer did all the adaptations on it's own. Just plug and play.
Chged the entire exh system ,Kleemann headers on down to the muffler and the car runs even more like a wild animal. Did not have to upgrade the SW still as a result.
#135
MBWorld Fanatic!
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Hmmm maybe we could ask Sleeper X if Oliver or Renntech came to NYC from Germany and Fla!
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by ProjectC55; 06-23-2008 at 11:12 PM.
#136
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Here is my take on this...
I bought the cams expecting similar results as Albert but didn't get it. After I saw the results I was willing to get a custom tune. Cory was nice enough to offer to do a custom tune on my car (YES, with VRP cams!!!) so I just wanted the specs on the cams to give him so he could get agressive with the tune. VRP did NOT offer to do a custom tune for my car and I was told that I needed to ship my car to Cali if I wanted a tune. Not until just recently (see above) has VRP offered to do a tune.
I STRONGLY disagree that I should stick to one tuner. I will go with whatever suits my needs the best. I considered Kleemann cams but wanted something more agressive, enter VRP. I have an eisenmann exhaust, brembo brakes, DPE wheels, KW suspension... all kinds of different stuff on my car. I buy what I think is best for me, not because it has some name on it.
Chicago X- Funny you should mention that, I sent them an email earlier today.
I have yet to datalog the car since I am doing a couple more mods in the next week or two and THEN I will be ready to talk to someone about a custom tune.
I bought the cams expecting similar results as Albert but didn't get it. After I saw the results I was willing to get a custom tune. Cory was nice enough to offer to do a custom tune on my car (YES, with VRP cams!!!) so I just wanted the specs on the cams to give him so he could get agressive with the tune. VRP did NOT offer to do a custom tune for my car and I was told that I needed to ship my car to Cali if I wanted a tune. Not until just recently (see above) has VRP offered to do a tune.
I STRONGLY disagree that I should stick to one tuner. I will go with whatever suits my needs the best. I considered Kleemann cams but wanted something more agressive, enter VRP. I have an eisenmann exhaust, brembo brakes, DPE wheels, KW suspension... all kinds of different stuff on my car. I buy what I think is best for me, not because it has some name on it.
Chicago X- Funny you should mention that, I sent them an email earlier today.
I have yet to datalog the car since I am doing a couple more mods in the next week or two and THEN I will be ready to talk to someone about a custom tune.
Last edited by blackbenzz; 06-23-2008 at 11:18 PM.
#137
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Dude,cams are cams regardless of who makes them. The difference would be whether the cams are made for F/I or not ,based on overlap and lift.. If the cams don't have too much overlap they can generally be used on any stck F/I,F/I kit ,Renntech or Kleemann, no matter who makes the cams. That goes for the programming as well.
That's why Vadim not only dyno tuned my car for countless hours and multiple sessions, he also road tunes it for several days to make sure the power is available/usable in daily driving conditons (up various grades, part throttle, stop and go, weather conditions, etc..). Maybe I'm not knowledgable enough but I just don't think ECU programming by mail is a complete solution for cars with multiple mods from different manufacturers and slightly different specs. I've heard stuff like FI is FI but I've always felt better having tuners take my car for days or even weeks to get it right (on the dyno but more importantly on the road). VRP's rates for doing this is very fair.
I know it's a hassle to leave your car with a tuner for weeks sometimes like I did but it eventually pays off especially if you don't need your car for commuting during that time.
Last edited by AMGSC; 06-24-2008 at 06:58 PM.
#138
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
e55 w/LET TUNE Drinks: vodka STRAIGHT Wheels: 19" HRE 547r Mods:FF headers ASP Pulley
Yes that's true but when you combine different mods from different makes then the tiny differences between each mod causes the variables to multiply exponentially.
That's why Vadim not only dyno tuned my car for countless hours and multiple sessions, he also road tunes it for several days to make sure the power is available/usable in daily driving conditons (up various grades, part throttle, stop and go, weather conditions, etc..). Maybe I'm not knowledgable enough but I just don't think ECU programming by mail is a complete solution for cars with multiple mods from different manufacturers and slightly different specs. I've heard stuff like FI is FI but I've always felt better having tuners take my car for days or even weeks to get it right (on the dyno but more importantly on the road). VRP's rates for doing this is very fair. I got a fixed fee of $1,000 for a custom tune. He just charged me 1 additional hr of dyno time at $125 for every major mod addition after that. That's because he knows I'm broke I guess and he feels sorry for my HPS nightmare.![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I know it's a hassle to leave your car with a tuner for weeks sometimes like I did but it eventually pays off especially if you don't need your car for commuting during that time. Vadim would never charge you custom tuning by the hour. He's very fair.
That's why Vadim not only dyno tuned my car for countless hours and multiple sessions, he also road tunes it for several days to make sure the power is available/usable in daily driving conditons (up various grades, part throttle, stop and go, weather conditions, etc..). Maybe I'm not knowledgable enough but I just don't think ECU programming by mail is a complete solution for cars with multiple mods from different manufacturers and slightly different specs. I've heard stuff like FI is FI but I've always felt better having tuners take my car for days or even weeks to get it right (on the dyno but more importantly on the road). VRP's rates for doing this is very fair. I got a fixed fee of $1,000 for a custom tune. He just charged me 1 additional hr of dyno time at $125 for every major mod addition after that. That's because he knows I'm broke I guess and he feels sorry for my HPS nightmare.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I know it's a hassle to leave your car with a tuner for weeks sometimes like I did but it eventually pays off especially if you don't need your car for commuting during that time. Vadim would never charge you custom tuning by the hour. He's very fair.
you nailed it
I laugh when people just get a tune on a dyno
if the tuner doesnt take the car out then whats the point
#139
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes that's true but when you combine different mods from different makes then the tiny differences between each mod causes the variables to multiply exponentially.
That's why Vadim not only dyno tuned my car for countless hours and multiple sessions, he also road tunes it for several days to make sure the power is available/usable in daily driving conditons (up various grades, part throttle, stop and go, weather conditions, etc..). Maybe I'm not knowledgable enough but I just don't think ECU programming by mail is a complete solution for cars with multiple mods from different manufacturers and slightly different specs. I've heard stuff like FI is FI but I've always felt better having tuners take my car for days or even weeks to get it right (on the dyno but more importantly on the road). VRP's rates for doing this is very fair. I got a fixed fee of $1,000 for a custom tune. He just charged me 1 additional hr of dyno time at $125 for every major mod addition after that. That's because he knows I'm broke I guess and he feels sorry for my HPS nightmare.![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I know it's a hassle to leave your car with a tuner for weeks sometimes like I did but it eventually pays off especially if you don't need your car for commuting during that time. Vadim would never charge you custom tuning by the hour. He's very fair.
That's why Vadim not only dyno tuned my car for countless hours and multiple sessions, he also road tunes it for several days to make sure the power is available/usable in daily driving conditons (up various grades, part throttle, stop and go, weather conditions, etc..). Maybe I'm not knowledgable enough but I just don't think ECU programming by mail is a complete solution for cars with multiple mods from different manufacturers and slightly different specs. I've heard stuff like FI is FI but I've always felt better having tuners take my car for days or even weeks to get it right (on the dyno but more importantly on the road). VRP's rates for doing this is very fair. I got a fixed fee of $1,000 for a custom tune. He just charged me 1 additional hr of dyno time at $125 for every major mod addition after that. That's because he knows I'm broke I guess and he feels sorry for my HPS nightmare.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I know it's a hassle to leave your car with a tuner for weeks sometimes like I did but it eventually pays off especially if you don't need your car for commuting during that time. Vadim would never charge you custom tuning by the hour. He's very fair.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
What the heck are you guys calling multiple mods?
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Since VRP wants to advertise these cams, then tell us where we can go locally in our areas across the US to tune our cars then if we purchase the cams. How's that!
The great thing about Activeautowerks is that if I have Schrick cams in my M3 and supporting mods(inj,exh,etc),I just mail them my ECU with my mods and it's a wrap. I don't have to drive my car all the way down to Fla if I don't want to. They have been doing this for yrs. If there is a problem they tell you to mail the ECU back and they make more adjustments. Car runs like a beast!!
Last edited by ProjectC55; 06-24-2008 at 07:56 AM.
#140
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'10 Porsche Turbo PDK, 500e, GL450
mods
I was under the impression he didn't just have a Kleemann supercharger and Eisenmann exhaust.
Regardless I've made my point ... you can get all excited as much as you want.
Regardless I've made my point ... you can get all excited as much as you want.
#141
MBWorld Fanatic!
Your a clown and you go on the ignore list! Have a nice day in your convertible and your latte in your hand.
![word](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
Last edited by ProjectC55; 06-24-2008 at 08:06 AM.
#143
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
S600TT, R350
Gents, come on, lets settle down.
Read my earlier posts and I will repeat this again.
The cams that Ahmad bought second hand were designed by Shrick to work on 55 Kompressor engines. Even if they did release the specs to Victor, my guess they are not exactly true. The only way to find out is to put them on CamDoctor and measure them.
Now, why do we need to know the specs? Is there a line in the software that you enter the cam specs? No.
To tune the car, one needs to know data, like A/F ratio vs. rpm. Timing vs. RPM, boost, engine temperature, air temperature and so on. Than based upon this data a tuner can adjust corresponding values in the data tables and hopefully get it close, as the values in the table use modifiers and are in metric format. In other words it is a pain that takes numerous iterations to perfect.
Obviously having a car at ones disposal and data logging it makes tuners life a lot simpler.
The problem with Ahmad's CLK is that it is a MAF car. At around 350 HP, MAF runs out of air flow and a voltage clamp flat lines MAF output and defaults to a map. A map that is likely has a fixed value. In addition Kleemann FMU adds fuel pressure vs. boost to keep A/F ratio safe. Very likely car is very rich with very retarded timing.
On Kompressor cars, the maps end at around 800HP aiflow.
So now you see why his car did not pick up the same numbers that Albert's car did.
In addition there are possibly other airflow/exhaust restrictions that we might not be aware off.
This is why his car needs tuning more than Kompressor 55s.
Read my earlier posts and I will repeat this again.
The cams that Ahmad bought second hand were designed by Shrick to work on 55 Kompressor engines. Even if they did release the specs to Victor, my guess they are not exactly true. The only way to find out is to put them on CamDoctor and measure them.
Now, why do we need to know the specs? Is there a line in the software that you enter the cam specs? No.
To tune the car, one needs to know data, like A/F ratio vs. rpm. Timing vs. RPM, boost, engine temperature, air temperature and so on. Than based upon this data a tuner can adjust corresponding values in the data tables and hopefully get it close, as the values in the table use modifiers and are in metric format. In other words it is a pain that takes numerous iterations to perfect.
Obviously having a car at ones disposal and data logging it makes tuners life a lot simpler.
The problem with Ahmad's CLK is that it is a MAF car. At around 350 HP, MAF runs out of air flow and a voltage clamp flat lines MAF output and defaults to a map. A map that is likely has a fixed value. In addition Kleemann FMU adds fuel pressure vs. boost to keep A/F ratio safe. Very likely car is very rich with very retarded timing.
On Kompressor cars, the maps end at around 800HP aiflow.
So now you see why his car did not pick up the same numbers that Albert's car did.
In addition there are possibly other airflow/exhaust restrictions that we might not be aware off.
This is why his car needs tuning more than Kompressor 55s.
#144
MBWorld Fanatic!
#145
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
S600TT, R350
that's what eddy current dyno's are for...
#146
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
Gents, come on, lets settle down.
Read my earlier posts and I will repeat this again.
The cams that Ahmad bought second hand were designed by Shrick to work on 55 Kompressor engines. Even if they did release the specs to Victor, my guess they are not exactly true. The only way to find out is to put them on CamDoctor and measure them.
Now, why do we need to know the specs? Is there a line in the software that you enter the cam specs? No.
To tune the car, one needs to know data, like A/F ratio vs. rpm. Timing vs. RPM, boost, engine temperature, air temperature and so on. Than based upon this data a tuner can adjust corresponding values in the data tables and hopefully get it close, as the values in the table use modifiers and are in metric format. In other words it is a pain that takes numerous iterations to perfect.
Obviously having a car at ones disposal and data logging it makes tuners life a lot simpler.
The problem with Ahmad's CLK is that it is a MAF car. At around 350 HP, MAF runs out of air flow and a voltage clamp flat lines MAF output and defaults to a map. A map that is likely has a fixed value. In addition Kleemann FMU adds fuel pressure vs. boost to keep A/F ratio safe. Very likely car is very rich with very retarded timing.
On Kompressor cars, the maps end at around 800HP aiflow.
So now you see why his car did not pick up the same numbers that Albert's car did.
In addition there are possibly other airflow/exhaust restrictions that we might not be aware off.
This is why his car needs tuning more than Kompressor 55s.
Read my earlier posts and I will repeat this again.
The cams that Ahmad bought second hand were designed by Shrick to work on 55 Kompressor engines. Even if they did release the specs to Victor, my guess they are not exactly true. The only way to find out is to put them on CamDoctor and measure them.
Now, why do we need to know the specs? Is there a line in the software that you enter the cam specs? No.
To tune the car, one needs to know data, like A/F ratio vs. rpm. Timing vs. RPM, boost, engine temperature, air temperature and so on. Than based upon this data a tuner can adjust corresponding values in the data tables and hopefully get it close, as the values in the table use modifiers and are in metric format. In other words it is a pain that takes numerous iterations to perfect.
Obviously having a car at ones disposal and data logging it makes tuners life a lot simpler.
The problem with Ahmad's CLK is that it is a MAF car. At around 350 HP, MAF runs out of air flow and a voltage clamp flat lines MAF output and defaults to a map. A map that is likely has a fixed value. In addition Kleemann FMU adds fuel pressure vs. boost to keep A/F ratio safe. Very likely car is very rich with very retarded timing.
On Kompressor cars, the maps end at around 800HP aiflow.
So now you see why his car did not pick up the same numbers that Albert's car did.
In addition there are possibly other airflow/exhaust restrictions that we might not be aware off.
This is why his car needs tuning more than Kompressor 55s.
Didn't you recently say you tuned a Kleemann sc C55 (437whp) and you tuned AMGSC's kleemann sc C55 (510whp)? Neither of which are 55k motors. What makes my car so much harder to tune? It will take you longer than 30 hours to tune my car because it took you that long to tune a 55k car? If I was to go with a VRP tune, what steps would I need to take?
#147
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
S600TT, R350
Why was none of this said BEFORE I bought the cams???
Didn't you recently say you tuned a Kleemann sc C55 (437whp) and you tuned AMGSC's kleemann sc C55 (510whp)? Neither of which are 55k motors.
If I was to go with a VRP tune, what steps would I need to take?
#148
Out Of Control!!
Thread Starter
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
So basically you are telling me no mail tune... thanks for the support
#150
MBWorld Fanatic!
btw, good dyno shops don't buy their fans at home depot and you don't need a billion dollar wind tunnel or 130mph airflow to map driveability... but you should at least start with an eddy current dyno.
you know better than to make misleading blanket statements like that.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)