e63 upgrades
Now you are going to get me started. Now I hope jrcart does go ahead and race gixxer, I'll put up some of my own money for that race. I saw jrcart run with my own two eyes, his car is in a different league PERIOD!
Per MB-USA the overall length of a CLK is 183.2 inches long, lets just call it 15 feet. As I stated earlier it appeared he was beating me by on average 12 car lengths in the quarter mile, thats 180 feet that converts to over 1 full second faster, does it not? So in reality, if my gtech is accurate jrcart is running faster than 11.30's. The reality is jrcart was running well above 120mph so his et is probably under 11.30. Sorry, but I'm just calling it how I saw it with my own eyes. As I stated earlier I have no vested interest, that was the first time I met jrcart and only wanted to see the evosport mods first hand. You all can doubt or think whatever you want, I have been drag racing my entire driving life, I know what I saw and I know now what that car is capable of. One more thing for the record, I own a heavily modded CLS55 that runs consistant 11 teens, so I am well aware of what you can do with the 55 motors.
I talk to Both Rob and Jim and there is no need for this , Rob just broke the 63 record in a stock E63 and I respect him. Relax, everyone this is all gotten silly and it is likely because I stirred the pot by talking about Jim's 206 mph run, still we are getting side tracked(get it ) tracked. LOL. FOCUS there is no need to call out anyone.
fact is nobody believed a 63 could dyno at 435 or better, nobody believed a 63 had attained 500 rwhp, and many doubted a sub 12 second pass was possible stock.
All three have been achieved by the two guys that are fighting.

This thread is about th OP that asked about upgrades for a car he feels needs to be made faster. We showed him some remedy and in doing so many counter points were brought up.
PLEASE PEOPLE TODAY IS A GREAT DAY and we can work this out!!
Per MB-USA the overall length of a CLK is 183.2 inches long, lets just call it 15 feet. As I stated earlier it appeared he was beating me by on average 12 car lengths in the quarter mile, thats 180 feet that converts to over 1 full second faster, does it not? So in reality, if my gtech is accurate jrcart is running faster than 11.30's. The reality is jrcart was running well above 120mph so his et is probably under 11.30. Sorry, but I'm just calling it how I saw it with my own eyes. As I stated earlier I have no vested interest, that was the first time I met jrcart and only wanted to see the evosport mods first hand. You all can doubt or think whatever you want, I have been drag racing my entire driving life, I know what I saw and I know now what that car is capable of. One more thing for the record, I own a heavily modded CLS55 that runs consistant 11 teens, so I am well aware of what you can do with the 55 motors.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG





In regrads to Carl, he is a long time member here and has zero complaints so lets chalk this up to a misunderstanding and move on.
As for the supposition of what each car will run ...I have no doubt they are fast but time slips are empirical in nature.




None bro, and I have to appreciate your passion (hence my comment in an earlier post). I guess not every loves their modded car like you- oh wait not everyone, in fact no one, even has a modded car like you.


Jealousy rears its ugly head
jcart, congrats for hitting the 500 whp
Hopefully more mods will come out and 63 will achieve even higher whp numbers
Fast55
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ventura County USA
Vehicle I drive: '06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
Posts: 1,711 No, I'm not. . The PDF is a comparison of only stock 55's and 63's.
__________________
Now, signature free!
Care to restate your position?
You told me specifically when a 63 hit 11 seconds you would reconsider your position. Day is here..
(Sorry, had to throw that in) It could take the AMG crown on the gas assuming he can get traction. Mr 573whp: If you make 573 RWHP in a CLS (assumed from your screen name), you shouldn't have any trouble keeping up with a 500 RWHP CLK? That match up should give you a good idea of what his BS will run until you can get it to a track. Videos please, I've yet to see an honest 600 hp pair of MB's getting it on.
Jr: Relax man. The car is a killer, no doubt. You've got to understand how much B.S. is posted here, it's almost non-stop. Some members have made a career out of exposing the crap. I've had more than a couple of coffee-from-nose laughing fits. Slow down and enjoy the site. Plenty of good people here and all are enthusiasts that enjoy ALL AMG's, not just 11 sec. black series CLK's. I never thought the wife's SLK55 was all that slow turning high 12's.
Congrats to gixxer whether or not his car is bone stock.
And they're REALLY messing with the wrong people. Anybody else met Oldgixxer? I wouldn't talk smack to him if I was holding a shotgun INSIDE an armored car.
(Sorry, had to throw that in) It could take the AMG crown on the gas assuming he can get traction. Mr 573whp: If you make 573 RWHP in a CLS (assumed from your screen name), you shouldn't have any trouble keeping up with a 500 RWHP CLK? That match up should give you a good idea of what his BS will run until you can get it to a track. Videos please, I've yet to see an honest 600 hp pair of MB's getting it on.
Jr: Relax man. The car is a killer, no doubt. You've got to understand how much B.S. is posted here, it's almost non-stop. Some members have made a career out of exposing the crap. I've had more than a couple of coffee-from-nose laughing fits. Slow down and enjoy the site. Plenty of good people here and all are enthusiasts that enjoy ALL AMG's, not just 11 sec. black series CLK's. I never thought the wife's SLK55 was all that slow turning high 12's.
Congrats to gixxer whether or not his car is bone stock.
"No 63 will hit 11s stock" Two different cars did it today . Im not asking you much , just to admit you erred in your prior statement.
I agree you still have a valid point on modability and overall performance. Averages on the 63 are coming way down after today.
jcart, congrats for hitting the 500 whp
Hopefully more mods will come out and 63 will achieve even higher whp numbers

There is a bunch of stuff done to my car that you can not even see and some of it has not ever been mentioned on this forum. For instance I had them replace all the brake lines with steel brake lines, new higher performance H&R lowering springs, it's got a roll cage and 4 point racing harnesses, a racing alignment and corner balancing...none of these things probably mean anything to you drag racers out there. I wanted them to build me a car that I could go to the Route 66 Raceway drag strip in the morning and run some killer times, then drive it just down the road to the Autobahn road courses and run some killer lap times in the afternoon and then drive the car out for a nice night on the town in style. In a nutshell I wanted a car that could be a threat or at least make a respectible stand against almost any other road going car out there, in any situation. From what I have seen and raced against so far they delivered what I wanted. So far I have raced a Ferarri F430...beat it, a supercharged Saleen Mustang...beat it, a built supercharged SRT-8 charger...beat it bad, and a stock CLK 63 Black Series...beat it bad.
I will post lap times at any track I run at as well as time slips from the drag strip as soon as it warms up and the tracks open up. I know that is the only way to shut some people up and prove a point.

What made you decide on the BS? I ask out of curiosity as a car like the F430 scud or Superlegerra can drag/track/cruise with the best of them and they bring lower kerbweights. Was it price of entry vs $$available for mods that ultimately make your car more personalized vs say a box-fresh f-car?
Your car looks very nice in the evosport pics and not looking to get screamed at.
"No 63 will hit 11s stock" Two different cars did it today . Im not asking you much , just to admit you erred in your prior statement.
I agree you still have a valid point on modability and overall performance. Averages on the 63 are coming way down after today.
What made you decide on the BS? I ask out of curiosity as a car like the F430 scud or Superlegerra can drag/track/cruise with the best of them and they bring lower kerbweights. Was it price of entry vs $$available for mods that ultimately make your car more personalized vs say a box-fresh f-car?
Your car looks very nice in the evosport pics and not looking to get screamed at.
*Edit- received PM from Jcart*
Gixxer's PM was more mild than this so don't see what NY's finest has done wrong here. Gix was personally attacked so responded
Last edited by transferred; Mar 10, 2008 at 10:21 PM.
PS, my e63 was 95k, not 75k. If you are quoting used values you are going to drop just as quick, actually quicker because of the mods. If you start quoting actual values - the mods you have done to your car have killed it's resale...you own that thing in perpetuity or you are going to get crushed.





