06 E55 vs. 06 C55
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
3-five-five/ TUNDRA/ 07 997 cab
06 E55 vs. 06 C55
Does a C55 pull as hard as a E55? I know the engines are similar but was wondering. It would seem a C is lighter therefore faster. Any input would be great.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Daytona, Florida
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
6 Posts
SL600
That style C55 was the n/a AMG block, same as in the CLK55. I have driven a C55 and a CLK55, and there is a major difference between them and an E55.
The C55/CLK55 may be a smidge faster right off the line, just because of the weight difference, but after that it's all over and an E55 would blow by it in no time.
The C55/CLK55 may be a smidge faster right off the line, just because of the weight difference, but after that it's all over and an E55 would blow by it in no time.
#3
Super Moderator
What kind of C55 is this? The E55 has something that the C55 doesn't...a supercharger. The C may be lighter then the E, but it is NOWHERE near the E55 as far as performance is concerned...
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2010 E63, 2008 Range Rover Sport, 2010 GLK350
The C55 and E55 do NOT have the same engine. The E55 has a kompressor on top and the C55 does not. The C55 uses the W210 E55 engine basically (no where near 500 HP - around 362HP I believe). So the E55 would pull on the C55 with no problem at all.
#5
back a few years ago i owned a C55. Was pretty much stock. Lined up with a CLS 55 and took him til about 80 mph and he slowly krept past me to about 1.5 car lengths by the 1/4 mile'ISH'
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
997.2 GT3
back a few years ago i owned a C55. Was pretty much stock. Lined up with a CLS 55 and took him til about 80 mph and he slowly krept past me to about 1.5 car lengths by the 1/4 mile'ISH'
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
Trending Topics
#8
I second that notion. Through the 1/4 mile, there's almost a second difference, or more depending how good the E55 launches. The C55 wouldn't stand a chance, stock to stock anyways.
Now, add a blower the C55 as well and, well... you've got yourself one pissed off little C-Class
Now, add a blower the C55 as well and, well... you've got yourself one pissed off little C-Class
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
back a few years ago i owned a C55. Was pretty much stock. Lined up with a CLS 55 and took him til about 80 mph and he slowly krept past me to about 1.5 car lengths by the 1/4 mile'ISH'
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
They are light and fast. Wish the c55 was supercharged! Would of had him all the way.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55, Renntech Pulley, ECU
Folks, these cars aren't in the same class. The C55 is a slug compared to the rampaging E55. The motor differential is WAY to large to make the weight difference a factor. Maybe in a ultra-tight autocross setting the weight would make the C faster, but in the real world it is E55 fodder. Come on folks... 360 HP for the C55 and let's not even talk about the torque difference. Unfair fight, comparing a smaller NA mildly fast car to the E.
Case closed.
Skeeter
Case closed.
Skeeter
Last edited by Skeeter; 02-24-2009 at 04:15 AM.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Folks, these cars aren't in the same class. The C55 is a slug compared to the rampaging E55. The motor differential is WAY to large to make the weight difference a factor. Maybe in a ultra-tight autocross setting the weight would make the C faster, but in the real world it is E55 fodder. Come on folks... 360 HP for the C55 and let's not even talk about the torque difference. Unfair fight, comparing a smaller NA mildly fast car to the E.
Case closed.
Skeeter
Case closed.
Skeeter
When I went looking for my new toy it was an E55 or S600. The C55 was NOT on my radar
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Really out gunned by the E or S.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: They are NOT that much lighter to make ANY real world difference that the lovely low end torque wouldn't crush
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#14
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I think you'd be surprised how fast those things get. Stock to stock, yes I would agree-- I don't even know why this thread was started, BUT a blown C55 will kill a stock E55.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Okay, but the cost of that blower for the C55, put into mods for the E55, and the E55 would KILL the C55 again![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#17
Okay, but the cost of that blower for the C55, put into mods for the E55, and the E55 would KILL the C55 again![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
If you start the issue with money, I need only point out the C55s are cheaper so therefor you'd actually be saving money instead of buying an E55. Even with the blower a C55 might still come out cheaper then an E55.
Whichever you choose, you can't go wrong with any combination. All push out a decent amount of power, smoke your neighbors F360 and still get the groceries
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
Folks, these cars aren't in the same class. The C55 is a slug compared to the rampaging E55. The motor differential is WAY to large to make the weight difference a factor. Maybe in a ultra-tight autocross setting the weight would make the C faster, but in the real world it is E55 fodder. Come on folks... 360 HP for the C55 and let's not even talk about the torque difference. Unfair fight, comparing a smaller NA mildly fast car to the E.
Case closed.
Skeeter
Case closed.
Skeeter
However, the E55 can become C55 "fodder" (as you put it) when any turns come into play (not just autocross, but on a high speed road circuit). The lighter weight and stiffer suspension setup of the more nimble C55 really makes a difference in such a situation. This is from observations made on lapping days at a track (ie real world average drivers situation).
This is not that surprising, as the C55 is more like the E46 M3 when it comes to direct competitors. Any Benz with a supercharged 5.4L V8 or the newer 6.2L V8 kills these cars in staright line acceleration.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: D.C. METRO AREA
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Nissan GT-R cobb/midpipe/ic piping/wastegate actuators/tials
Okay, but the cost of that blower for the C55, put into mods for the E55, and the E55 would KILL the C55 again![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
I am just saying why start the battle with a handicap my friend. Besides the E55 is a MUCH nicer ride to begin with.
Oh well, to each his own. Good luck with whatever car/supercharger combination you choose.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
PS: I'll stay with my V12
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
997.2 GT3
C55 is a better handling car than the E55, but it would still be far down my list of track or autocross cars. Considering only 4-door sedans, I'd put the Evo, STI, E36 M3, 335i and 330i ZHP all ahead in the handling department.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55 AMG, 135i, 911 GT3, GLE43 AMG
But the beauty of the C55 is that it has handling grip and laptimes that are very close to the E46 M3 coupe. That's what sold me on the C55.....I get the benefit of a 4 door sedan to take the family with a ride which isn't as harsh, yet can keep up with the E46 M3 on a twisty track back in 2004/2005 when the C55 was introduced. The only negative is it doesn't have the superior driving "feel" of the M3. Basically, I viewed it as a very all-rounded multipurpose 4 door sedan that I could take to the track occasionally.
The newer generation 135i/335i are very decent too, which basically offers the performance of the previous E46 M3 at a lower cost.
Magazine tests and laptimes are all consistent in showing similar on-track performance between the C55 and E46 M3, but I've already proven to myself on lapping days what the C55 is capable of against cars like the E46 M3, E36 M3's, STi's, and even E55's
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
As for autocross, I haven't tried it with the C55, although I suspect it's performance will not be as good as its track performance against it's rivals. Having said that, some C32/C55 members also autocross their cars, with decent success.
Anyways, we're getting off topic here. The original poster was referring simply to straight line acceleration between the E55 and C55. There is no dispute there which one is faster if the straight is long enough.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
You used to help people out on this forum.. Not sure what happened
Last edited by AKnight55; 02-01-2012 at 10:14 PM.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!