W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63

Am I the only one that thinks Nav is unnecessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-10-2003, 11:58 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Air Force
 
E55 KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,530
Received 198 Likes on 156 Posts
2016 GLE63s / 2016 E63s / 2002 E55
No confirmation, however, that is the word I have read on the W211 E-Class board. There is also some rumor about the new W211 DVD Comand being compatible with "BlueTooth" phones. I have no idea what bluetooth is?
Old 02-10-2003, 12:02 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
Eddie Knopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2013 E 350, 2012 GLK 350, 2012 C300 4matic
Bluetooth

E55 KEV - Bluetooth is a Motorola (amongst others) standard for wireless tranmissions.

One could envision wireless linkage of the phone (no beg deal), but how about wirless connection into command for an MP3 player ????
Old 02-10-2003, 12:13 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Veteran: Air Force
 
E55 KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 5,530
Received 198 Likes on 156 Posts
2016 GLE63s / 2016 E63s / 2002 E55
Re: Bluetooth

Originally posted by Eddie Knopp
E55 KEV - Bluetooth is a Motorola (amongst others) standard for wireless tranmissions.

One could envision wireless linkage of the phone (no beg deal), but how about wirless connection into command for an MP3 player ????
Thanks Eddie, not wireless however, the W210 Comand has an Aux input in the glove box to add an MP3 player. Maybe the W211 system will have an Aux input also.
Old 02-10-2003, 12:32 PM
  #29  
Super Member
 
Eddie Knopp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2013 E 350, 2012 GLK 350, 2012 C300 4matic
The bluetooth is a wireless protocol. Maybe that's the future.

I'm still interested if anyone can truly confirm whether the Nav can be retrofitted easily.
Old 02-11-2003, 09:52 AM
  #30  
Almost a Member!
 
Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: S VA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 E55 '99 ML430 '96 C4 Cab
Dr. Chill;
I have a portable GPS system (nexian) that I use with my non-nav vehicles. The GPS antenna module plugs into my handspring visor. I load the visor with whatever maps I need (highway level for the trip, street level for my destination). It has very limited utility. It is difficult to pick up a GPS signal, even with the optional external antenna. Without the external antenna, I could only pick up a signal when the unit was on the dash, up against the windshield, and unavailable for viewing. It does better in my convertable with the top down. I don't know it the garmen system is much better. It would be nice if someone who has one would post their opinion of it.
Rich
'99 ML430 w/Alpine multimedia system w/CD rom nav
'96 911 C4 Cab
'01 E55

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Am I the only one that thinks Nav is unnecessary?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.