E60 M5 vs. '10 CTS-V in HD video
10-10-2009, 02:01 AM
#51
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A Prius because I'm green
10-10-2009, 02:10 AM
#52
.
10-10-2009, 02:20 AM
#53
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A Prius because I'm green
10-10-2009, 05:17 AM
#54
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden, Europe
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG
Marky,
Do you know why this race was so much closer than the one against the M5? I know the M5 estate is heavier... but this is a very different outcome!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_vZk...eature=related
-m
Do you know why this race was so much closer than the one against the M5? I know the M5 estate is heavier... but this is a very different outcome!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_vZk...eature=related
-m
they are such biased *******s
10-10-2009, 04:04 PM
#56
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2008 ML320 CDI
10-11-2009, 09:41 AM
#58
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
S65 vs M5, the speed is 295 km/h (183 mph) at the end of the airfield. It's a vid from Gustav. I'm the driver of the S65.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7hiI...&feature=email
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7hiI...&feature=email
CTS-V's rock BTW. I don't think the car in the OG Video is running right, but either way, how are you guys saying an M5 can take it up top? I'd assume with the V's extra HP, it shouldn't be a problem. Although I know the M5's are geared to, and really shine in the high high speeds.
10-11-2009, 04:28 PM
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
///M5 Beast
Here is some video for you guys to fight over aswell.
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
Last edited by Brisk335; 10-11-2009 at 04:31 PM.
10-11-2009, 08:41 PM
#61
Here is some video for you guys to fight over aswell.
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
10-12-2009, 02:13 AM
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
///M5 Beast
^ good info.. But the M5 walked the Is-f aswell, which what i expected for stock M5 vs a intake/no cats IS-F...
If it was as modded as you say, The M5 would have beaten the is-f by alot more, the IS-F was actually sticking with it for a little. So maybe it was NOT really modded?
If it was as modded as you say, The M5 would have beaten the is-f by alot more, the IS-F was actually sticking with it for a little. So maybe it was NOT really modded?
Last edited by Brisk335; 10-12-2009 at 04:48 PM.
10-12-2009, 04:37 AM
#63
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CTS-V & 2010 E63 AMG
Cant believe this race ... according to my races against M5 from 0-280 kmh ... i was ahead by 2-4 car length ... and my car is stock ... i think my new E63 will kill M5 same what i did with my CTS-V
