E60 M5 vs. '10 CTS-V in HD video
Do you know why this race was so much closer than the one against the M5? I know the M5 estate is heavier... but this is a very different outcome!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_vZk...eature=related
-m
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7hiI...&feature=email
CTS-V's rock BTW. I don't think the car in the OG Video is running right, but either way, how are you guys saying an M5 can take it up top? I'd assume with the V's extra HP, it shouldn't be a problem. Although I know the M5's are geared to, and really shine in the high high speeds.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
Last edited by Brisk335; Oct 11, 2009 at 04:31 PM.
The m5 with SMG is FASTER than the CTS-V.. It traps higher from multiple places i have seen the 2 be put up aganist eachother, maybe the 6MT M5 might lose. As for the OP video, the M5 is trapping higher by the 1/4mile, cant compare track times and such to a E-timed airfield run as was done here with others time. Elevation, temp, track and equipment used all vary and as will the traps. Plus the M5 got a late start it seems.
GO TO MINTUE 4:00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zL0VcbZp0pI
If it was as modded as you say, The M5 would have beaten the is-f by alot more, the IS-F was actually sticking with it for a little. So maybe it was NOT really modded?
Last edited by Brisk335; Oct 12, 2009 at 04:48 PM.




.
they are such biased *******s
