New TT will have 10:1 compression. Massive HP mod gains gonna be limited?
He's got a point in that most massive hp monsters are running 8-9:1 compression.
Wild card I keep bringing up to him is the Direct Injection system which is gonna let us run more boost on higher compression (just going from what Benz is saying on press releases)
Interesting.




Renntech is already planning some decent (50-60hp gain) ECU reprogramming.
The problem is VVV
1St Di injectors are highly unreliable, Do not run the fuel system low on fuel , too the point of air getting into the fuel system.
2nd this is that spark plug technology hasn't quite caught up to the DI demands. They will not make 30.000 miles , High tip erosion , from high pressure fuel being sprayed at them . and long spark duration , to light it off in stratified mode.
3rd packageing. on a 4 valve head motor there is not much room for a centrally mounted DI injector , & then find a place to locate the Spark plug so it can light off the fuel correctly
There is a ton of issues with DI on a 4 stroke engine. It works well on 2 strokes. My guess it will take another 5 years, before you will see it in car engines Sorry for the sad news . _PTEngineering
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Audi A3
Audi R8
Audi S4
Cadillac STS
Chevrolet HHR SS
Pontiac Solstice GXP
Volkswagen Jetta GLI
Ferrari California
Porsche 997
Porsche Caymen
X6 XDrive 50i
Ford Ecoboost - multiple applications
Checy Ecotec - multiple applications
Audi A3
Audi R8
Audi S4
Cadillac STS
Chevrolet HHR SS
Pontiac Solstice GXP
Volkswagen Jetta GLI
Ferrari California
Porsche 997
Porsche Caymen
X6 XDrive 50i
Ford Ecoboost - multiple applications
Checy Ecotec - multiple applications
Also, the 4.2 in the Audi A8 has been DI since 2007.
Doesn't the BMW 335 also run DI and their pumps always fail?
But apparently technically impossible.
One of the properties of DFI is the ability to run higher compression because the flame front moves much faster which allows less advance on the spark and reduces the chance of pre-detonation.
From what I have read, everything needs to become more and more finely tuned. So I am willing to bet that reliability will likely fall off much faster as you move from "stock to awe".
One of the properties of DFI is the ability to run higher compression because the flame front moves much faster which allows less advance on the spark and reduces the chance of pre-detonation.
From what I have read, everything needs to become more and more finely tuned. So I am willing to bet that reliability will likely fall off much faster as you move from "stock to awe".
), and one of the issues I came across was concern about buildup around the valves, etc., *outside* the cylinder due to absence of the detergent effect of fuel. I tried surfing for it just now but could not find the posts (admittedly I did not try very hard).
Last edited by i_am_amused; Aug 27, 2010 at 06:42 PM.
There are different strategies manufactures employ to keep it in check. DI engines make more power because they run more compression and have more oxygen per combustion cycle( due to running much leaner than traditional stoich ratio). The injectors produce more swirl and combine with the airflow to make a more heterogeneous mixtrure. This higher compression and "leaner" burn mean the engines run alot hotter than non DI. That is the first way they deal with carbon buildup. Extra heat to cook off alot of the blowby gases. They also add complex PCV Catch cans( or cyclone filters) to prevent much of the gunk from getting injested. Lastly they also add supplementary injectors in the IM to provide the "wash down" that I mentioned earlier. The new engine will employ this in some fashion I am sure.
Last edited by KLR CLS; Aug 28, 2010 at 04:49 PM.





