What would you say if I told you that a Wanna-Be Tuner's Jealousy makes them Lie?
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
MB AMG Test Pilot
What would you say if I told you that a Wanna-Be Tuner's Jealousy makes them Lie?
Here's the jealousy induced lie, hypothetically speaking:
Hypothetically, It's obvious as to why someone would start a hypothetical lie like this:
1) Jealousy is eating the hypothetical person alive (let's call him KockmoLC56 to conceal his identity) that another CL65 beat his CL65 by a tenth and has been trying for months to get the title back, including modifying his turbos with billet wheels, porting the compressor side, and reducing the weight of the car (notice no outrageous hypothetical claims made by KockmoLC56 against other tuners when KockmoLC56's E.T. was the fastest - Kockmo can't throw stones from his hypothetical glass house);
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
3) The hypothetical person's liddle feewings are hurt because the well respected tuner they are trying to disparage with this thread refused to work on their car and desperately wanted them to. (I have seen PMs to prove it and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
4) The hypothetical liar was offered the opportunity to inspect the car he is hypothetically trying to disparage, and he declined, because he would have to put his hypothetical money where his hypothetical mouth is. (I have seen PMs to prove this as well and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
5) The hypothetical liar would have to be seriously delusional to think anybody who knows anything about a CL65 would believe that any real tuner (such as Renntech, Brabus, etc) needs to use NOS on a CL65 to beat the hypothetical CL65 by a tenth of a second. See number #2 above as to why the delusion might occur.
Get the hypothetical picture?
Let's say in a TOTALLY hypothetical situation that someone on this board gathered conclusive proof that a Tuner was blatantly misrepresenting the performance of their tunes and supporting mods. Should this person disclose these facts or should the truth come out? I can see a street racer or hustler misrepresent their set up in hopes of luring an unknowing opponent into a money race, but a Tuner? Is it right for a Tuner to flat out lie about the extent of the mods and upgraded components that are on a shop/customer car in order drive sales and make their tunes appear more capable? Let's also suppose that this tuner had all the employees sign a legal document to not disclose these "secret mods" under the threat of a major lawsuit? Would the existence of such a document mean that they are protecting their IP or hiding something? Again, totally hypothetical
Hypothetically, It's obvious as to why someone would start a hypothetical lie like this:
1) Jealousy is eating the hypothetical person alive (let's call him KockmoLC56 to conceal his identity) that another CL65 beat his CL65 by a tenth and has been trying for months to get the title back, including modifying his turbos with billet wheels, porting the compressor side, and reducing the weight of the car (notice no outrageous hypothetical claims made by KockmoLC56 against other tuners when KockmoLC56's E.T. was the fastest - Kockmo can't throw stones from his hypothetical glass house);
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
3) The hypothetical person's liddle feewings are hurt because the well respected tuner they are trying to disparage with this thread refused to work on their car and desperately wanted them to. (I have seen PMs to prove it and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
4) The hypothetical liar was offered the opportunity to inspect the car he is hypothetically trying to disparage, and he declined, because he would have to put his hypothetical money where his hypothetical mouth is. (I have seen PMs to prove this as well and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
5) The hypothetical liar would have to be seriously delusional to think anybody who knows anything about a CL65 would believe that any real tuner (such as Renntech, Brabus, etc) needs to use NOS on a CL65 to beat the hypothetical CL65 by a tenth of a second. See number #2 above as to why the delusion might occur.
Get the hypothetical picture?
Trending Topics
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 12,139
Likes: 295
From: Houston
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Well the way I see it, is that for majority of the tuners, tuning is their primary source of income. Now if they are doing something wrong/falsifying information yes I am all for exposing them. But on the other hand if a particular individual is trying harm the image of a reputable tuner for some other selfish reason, then I feel that is just wrong.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
211-55
It's good to see both sides of the story but you should have posted your rebuttal in the original thread since it is still unlocked. Now I'm stuck reading between two hypothetical threads, which if two wrongs don't make a right and two rights don't make a left, then your hypotheticals cancel each other out and you're both stating facts, which doesn't make much sense to me.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI FL
2006 C230 6speed/14 C63
+1
seriously...
OP YOUR not in the risk of getting sued by legally binding contract so if you REALLY have the proof you should just post it.. NOT HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING
...
seriously...
OP YOUR not in the risk of getting sued by legally binding contract so if you REALLY have the proof you should just post it.. NOT HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING
...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: OC, SoCal
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
-Rob
Super Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
E55 AMG, 72' Toyota Carina, 63' Ford F100, 72' Mercedes 250c, 15' Harley Davidson Softail
well then let's say, Hypothetically of course, I don't give a s*** about e-thugging threads. would that make me seem like a hypothetical douchebag?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 9
From: Blasting off!
CLS63 Designo Edition, Hyundai Genesis 3.8 , Veloster Turbo, CLS500(Sold), E320 (SMOKED) R500 (Sold)
Can we get down to the brass tacks and facts of the matter at hand? I think we all are in consensus on that.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Finally some "hypothetical" information from the other side....
In my opinion, it is always an extremely good call for big and well-respected hypothetical tuners to NOT TOUCH cars that have been messed with by a million other tuners because the last tuner always gets the blame when a catastrophic failure occurs. It has happened many times in the past and will continue to happen many times in the future.
In my opinion, it is always an extremely good call for big and well-respected hypothetical tuners to NOT TOUCH cars that have been messed with by a million other tuners because the last tuner always gets the blame when a catastrophic failure occurs. It has happened many times in the past and will continue to happen many times in the future.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 5
From: South FL & NYC
Your worst nightmare...
Why hide under a new screen name?? Didn't the OP post in his original screen name? To me it's like throwing a rock and hiding your hand.
If you were really trying to face the hypothetical BS…then there would be no need to hide under a fake name. Ohh well...carry on.
If you were really trying to face the hypothetical BS…then there would be no need to hide under a fake name. Ohh well...carry on.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Common guys, this is way too much drama for the whole tuner vs tuner type debates..... although I think it's probably good entertainment for Fridays
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 13
From: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Just a like a ball game with stats.
So far we are at a staggering 49 uses of Hypothetic and it's variants.
Well on pace to shatter the record set in the other thread.
So far we are at a staggering 49 uses of Hypothetic and it's variants.
Well on pace to shatter the record set in the other thread.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 5
From: South FL & NYC
Your worst nightmare...
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
