What would you say if I told you that a Wanna-Be Tuner's Jealousy makes them Lie?
09-17-2010, 02:02 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MB AMG Test Pilot
What would you say if I told you that a Wanna-Be Tuner's Jealousy makes them Lie?
Here's the jealousy induced lie, hypothetically speaking:
Hypothetically, It's obvious as to why someone would start a hypothetical lie like this:
1) Jealousy is eating the hypothetical person alive (let's call him KockmoLC56 to conceal his identity) that another CL65 beat his CL65 by a tenth and has been trying for months to get the title back, including modifying his turbos with billet wheels, porting the compressor side, and reducing the weight of the car (notice no outrageous hypothetical claims made by KockmoLC56 against other tuners when KockmoLC56's E.T. was the fastest - Kockmo can't throw stones from his hypothetical glass house);
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
3) The hypothetical person's liddle feewings are hurt because the well respected tuner they are trying to disparage with this thread refused to work on their car and desperately wanted them to. (I have seen PMs to prove it and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
4) The hypothetical liar was offered the opportunity to inspect the car he is hypothetically trying to disparage, and he declined, because he would have to put his hypothetical money where his hypothetical mouth is. (I have seen PMs to prove this as well and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
5) The hypothetical liar would have to be seriously delusional to think anybody who knows anything about a CL65 would believe that any real tuner (such as Renntech, Brabus, etc) needs to use NOS on a CL65 to beat the hypothetical CL65 by a tenth of a second. See number #2 above as to why the delusion might occur.
Get the hypothetical picture?
Let's say in a TOTALLY hypothetical situation that someone on this board gathered conclusive proof that a Tuner was blatantly misrepresenting the performance of their tunes and supporting mods. Should this person disclose these facts or should the truth come out? I can see a street racer or hustler misrepresent their set up in hopes of luring an unknowing opponent into a money race, but a Tuner? Is it right for a Tuner to flat out lie about the extent of the mods and upgraded components that are on a shop/customer car in order drive sales and make their tunes appear more capable? Let's also suppose that this tuner had all the employees sign a legal document to not disclose these "secret mods" under the threat of a major lawsuit? Would the existence of such a document mean that they are protecting their IP or hiding something? Again, totally hypothetical
Hypothetically, It's obvious as to why someone would start a hypothetical lie like this:
1) Jealousy is eating the hypothetical person alive (let's call him KockmoLC56 to conceal his identity) that another CL65 beat his CL65 by a tenth and has been trying for months to get the title back, including modifying his turbos with billet wheels, porting the compressor side, and reducing the weight of the car (notice no outrageous hypothetical claims made by KockmoLC56 against other tuners when KockmoLC56's E.T. was the fastest - Kockmo can't throw stones from his hypothetical glass house);
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
3) The hypothetical person's liddle feewings are hurt because the well respected tuner they are trying to disparage with this thread refused to work on their car and desperately wanted them to. (I have seen PMs to prove it and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
4) The hypothetical liar was offered the opportunity to inspect the car he is hypothetically trying to disparage, and he declined, because he would have to put his hypothetical money where his hypothetical mouth is. (I have seen PMs to prove this as well and will forward to anyone that wants them, hypothetically speaking);
5) The hypothetical liar would have to be seriously delusional to think anybody who knows anything about a CL65 would believe that any real tuner (such as Renntech, Brabus, etc) needs to use NOS on a CL65 to beat the hypothetical CL65 by a tenth of a second. See number #2 above as to why the delusion might occur.
Get the hypothetical picture?
09-17-2010, 02:24 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ahh...yes. The drama unfolds. Feel free to send PM', hypothetically that is.
Trending Topics
09-17-2010, 02:39 PM
#8
Former Vendor of MBWorld
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes
on
242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Well the way I see it, is that for majority of the tuners, tuning is their primary source of income. Now if they are doing something wrong/falsifying information yes I am all for exposing them. But on the other hand if a particular individual is trying harm the image of a reputable tuner for some other selfish reason, then I feel that is just wrong.
09-17-2010, 03:01 PM
#9
It's good to see both sides of the story but you should have posted your rebuttal in the original thread since it is still unlocked. Now I'm stuck reading between two hypothetical threads, which if two wrongs don't make a right and two rights don't make a left, then your hypotheticals cancel each other out and you're both stating facts, which doesn't make much sense to me.
09-17-2010, 03:26 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MIAMI FL
Posts: 1,073
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 C230 6speed/14 C63
+1
seriously...
OP YOUR not in the risk of getting sued by legally binding contract so if you REALLY have the proof you should just post it.. NOT HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING
...
seriously...
OP YOUR not in the risk of getting sued by legally binding contract so if you REALLY have the proof you should just post it.. NOT HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING
...
09-17-2010, 03:30 PM
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
2) Any intelligent person would see that the hypothetical person making such a negative hypothetical lie about a well respected hypothetical tuner must be *** drunk from being on their hypothetical knees at the tuner's shop they are trying to hypothetically promote with this hypothetical lie;
-Rob
09-17-2010, 03:56 PM
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55 AMG, 72' Toyota Carina, 63' Ford F100, 72' Mercedes 250c, 15' Harley Davidson Softail
well then let's say, Hypothetically of course, I don't give a s*** about e-thugging threads. would that make me seem like a hypothetical douchebag?
09-17-2010, 04:07 PM
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Can we get down to the brass tacks and facts of the matter at hand? I think we all are in consensus on that.
09-17-2010, 04:10 PM
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Finally some "hypothetical" information from the other side....
In my opinion, it is always an extremely good call for big and well-respected hypothetical tuners to NOT TOUCH cars that have been messed with by a million other tuners because the last tuner always gets the blame when a catastrophic failure occurs. It has happened many times in the past and will continue to happen many times in the future.
In my opinion, it is always an extremely good call for big and well-respected hypothetical tuners to NOT TOUCH cars that have been messed with by a million other tuners because the last tuner always gets the blame when a catastrophic failure occurs. It has happened many times in the past and will continue to happen many times in the future.
09-17-2010, 04:20 PM
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Why hide under a new screen name?? Didn't the OP post in his original screen name? To me it's like throwing a rock and hiding your hand.
If you were really trying to face the hypothetical BS…then there would be no need to hide under a fake name. Ohh well...carry on.
If you were really trying to face the hypothetical BS…then there would be no need to hide under a fake name. Ohh well...carry on.
09-17-2010, 04:37 PM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Common guys, this is way too much drama for the whole tuner vs tuner type debates..... although I think it's probably good entertainment for Fridays
09-17-2010, 05:00 PM
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Just a like a ball game with stats.
So far we are at a staggering 49 uses of Hypothetic and it's variants.
Well on pace to shatter the record set in the other thread.
So far we are at a staggering 49 uses of Hypothetic and it's variants.
Well on pace to shatter the record set in the other thread.
09-17-2010, 05:24 PM
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
