M5 Smack talk

We could always have a nice Formosa M5 vs E55 event. I promise we play nice.
Last edited by pearlpower; Dec 19, 2010 at 09:59 PM.
I would love to race any M car Ill even race up to 180 just to show you guys what a healthy working e55 setup runs.
That K4 car is supposed to have 640hp,how is it losing to a stock M car?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0hThO4LnT4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kENHL174VBs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL1_rCRXC5g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_zV0Ahkw5Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REmBlx2klGY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5jZ_L7QfvY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7RhpFJC_1g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDdVlAg8CgQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plo6f4t1ERo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQqUACAe_Rw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDqfh5BThdU
All those atilla E55 vids involve a known HEAVILY modded E55. Enough said.
That black M6 had 24 inch rims it looked like... Enough said...
Dead stops are NOT exactly easy for M5s/M6s...so no surprise. I did expect the AMG to pull off the line easily and it did.
The rest (if I missed any), were the drivers all driving properly??? P500S, S6 on , DSC off etc.?

We could always have a nice Formosa M5 vs E55 event. I promise we play nice.
Luckily for me, I have the best of both worlds (AMG SL55 and BMW M5). Obviously the SL is much better and easier to crusie around town with its torque just like the E55s. For highway and cornering speeds, I prefer the M5 all the way. Doesn't even compare in terms of handling of course.
Sorry if I came here looking like I wanted to start a war. I just wanted to defend the M5 and see what your responses would be. So far though, I've heard some people say they're even in all speeds and some others... (like that one poster who said he beat a modded m5 with 4 people in his stock car...) well.. yeah.
Hard to debate I'd say. I would LOVE to run a stock E55 AMG near my area soon to settle this once and for all.
SLR, CLK/SL BS, SLS? And besides, Nurburgring slightly favors high powered vehicles moreso than handlers imo. Don't get me wrong, i love the three pointed star, but i'm realistic too.
I can only imagine how much faster an AMG would be if it had a 6spd manual hooked up to it as opposed to an auto tranny.
All those atilla E55 vids involve a known HEAVILY modded E55. Enough said.
That black M6 had 24 inch rims it looked like... Enough said...
Dead stops are NOT exactly easy for M5s/M6s...so no surprise. I did expect the AMG to pull off the line easily and it did.
The rest (if I missed any), were the drivers all driving properly??? P500S, S6 on , DSC off etc.?

EDIT: Also while you're at it making up reasons for the M5/M6 losses in the youtube videos, maybe you can explain all these 13 second low-trapping M's. I'm waiting for you to just admit it takes a brain surgeon to drive an M car properly.
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-21091.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-20516.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-19718.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-19779.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-10867.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-7687.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-17443.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19561.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19734.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19465.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-20107.html
Last edited by cahiil55k; Dec 19, 2010 at 10:24 PM.
I agree that Merc does make cars that can run faster lap times at Nurburing due to vehicle cost/platform/etc.. (clk BS, BS,SLS, SLR)
but please tell me you agree with the following
In terms of Handling/steering feel
335i>c350
e30 m3> 190e 2.3
e36 m3> c43
e46 m3> c32 & c55
e9x m3> c63
e39 m5> w210 e55
e60 m5> w211 e55/e63
e63 m6> Sl55
maybe the s63/s65 handles better than a 760i but who knows. Im willing to bet the 750i feels sportier than a s500/550
and these differences are so large that they can be easily felt in normal day to day driving. There is no need for turning into a 2 lane road at 60 mph for you to feel the differences. If you can't feel it in normal driving, then you are not very sensitive. I could sit blindfolded in a m5 and e55 and tell which car i was being driven around in. Heck aven e46 m3 to 335i is noticeable.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I agree that Merc does make cars that can run faster lap times at Nurburing due to vehicle cost/platform/etc.. (clk BS, BS,SLS, SLR)
but please tell me you agree with the following
In terms of Handling/steering feel
335i>c350
e30 m3> 190e 2.3
e36 m3> c43
e46 m3> c32 & c55
e9x m3> c63
e39 m5> w210 e55
e60 m5> w211 e55/e63
e63 m6> Sl55
maybe the s63/s65 handles better than a 760i but who knows. Im willing to bet the 750i feels sportier than a s500/550
and these differences are so large that they can be easily felt in normal day to day driving. There is no need for turning into a 2 lane road at 60 mph for you to feel the differences. If you can't feel it in normal driving, then you are not very sensitive. I could sit blindfolded in a m5 and e55 and tell which car i was being driven around in. Heck aven e46 m3 to 335i is noticeable.
Since 95% of BMW driver's cant drive to begin with it doesn't make a difference that they begin to talk about handling etc. Look at the speedometer when you turn and that's the true handling capabilities. It doesnt matter how it feels as long as it gets it done. The SL55 will do it very quietly while the M while just make it feel harder for you. The Steering of the Benz's is very soft, while the M's are firm. But they will accomplish the same. Go Look at Dino from Veloce tune and how he tracked his SL55 better than SRT 10 Vipers and F cars. Actually the SL55 out-handles both the M5 and M6, I bet you didn't know that either and runs better times on the Nurburgring.
BMW's are obselte in a sense they don't have the straight line power or the turns. It's Porsche who is actually MB's main competition because they make FAST machine and Handling MONSTERS, which can knock on AMG's door.
Look at the E92 vs C63 Comparison, it has better handling because of what ? In a super extreme condition Solomon it was 1 sec faster. When are you going to be drifting between cones at 69 MPH? It's like MB making MB's work in space in case the earth implodes tomorrow. THE BMW's handling is no better than a light weight Honda. At the end of the day its about brute force straight line power and braking which AMG Deliver and it will handle 1:1 for the BMW, except it will be miles ahead already
even starting from 50km the stock E55 rules a stock M5 until they reach 250km and then M5 starts to catch up and pass buy the E55.
however, M5 owners always want to start from a bit high speed. and the members here knows i like to drive a bit high ^_^. so i started with an M5 from 200km heis is stock and mine is modded. believe me, i blew him away from 200 to 280km he fell behind me by 25 - 30 meters. he was satisfied because we tried from 0 and from 60 and from 120km.
there is no chance even for a modded M5 to beat a modded E55 even on high speeds if the E55 had headers. well except if it was the M5 G-power double supercharged.
i also have i video in the drag with a modded M5. i was ahead of him by a 1.3 seconds. but didn't post it on youtube.
Last edited by Ali_E55; Dec 19, 2010 at 11:26 PM.
even starting from 50km the stock E55 rules a stock M5 until they reach 250km and then M5 starts to catch up and pass buy the E55.
however, M5 owners always want to start from a bit high speed. and the members here knows i like to drive a bit high ^_^. so i started with an M5 from 200km heis is stock and mine is modded. believe me, i blew him away from 200 to 280km he fell behind me by 25 - 30 meters. he was satisfied because we tried from 0 and from 60 and from 120km.
there is no chance even for a modded M5 to beat a modded E55 even on high speeds if the E55 had headers. well except if it was the M5 G-power double supercharged.
i also have i video in the drag with a modded M5. i was ahead of him by a 1.3 seconds. but didn't post it on youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9ObA18Ggm0
EDIT: Also while you're at it making up reasons for the M5/M6 losses in the youtube videos, maybe you can explain all these 13 second low-trapping M's. I'm waiting for you to just admit it takes a brain surgeon to drive an M car properly.
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-21091.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-20516.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-19718.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-19779.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-10867.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-7687.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M5-Timeslip-17443.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19561.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19734.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-19465.html
http://www.dragtimes.com/BMW-M6-Timeslip-20107.html

I can keep going... It's funny how you behave.
13 seconds for a M5/M6 just means bad launch/ no use of launch control... You know, Road and Track, a couple of years ago, tested an M6 and M5 and both did 1/4 mile at around 12.1 seconds/118 mph each. Yeah, stock.
0-60= 4.0 seconds flat
0-100= 9.4 s
0-150= 20.6 (around I believe) s
I presume that this was done by good magazine test drivers and not amateurs. LOL at your comment that it takes brain surgeons to drive. I sense some fanboyism on ya kiddo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9ObA18Ggm0

I can keep going... It's funny how you behave.
13 seconds for a M5/M6 just means bad launch/ no use of launch control... You know, Road and Track, a couple of years ago, tested an M6 and M5 and both did 1/4 mile at around 12.1 seconds/118 mph each. Yeah, stock.
0-60= 4.0 seconds flat
0-100= 9.4 s
0-150= 20.6 (around I believe) s
I presume that this was done by good magazine test drivers and not amateurs. LOL at your comment that it takes brain surgeons to drive. I sense some fanboyism on ya kiddo.
I agree that Merc does make cars that can run faster lap times at Nurburing due to vehicle cost/platform/etc.. (clk BS, BS,SLS, SLR)
but please tell me you agree with the following
In terms of Handling/steering feel
335i>c350
e30 m3> 190e 2.3
e36 m3> c43
e46 m3> c32 & c55
e9x m3> c63
e39 m5> w210 e55
e60 m5> w211 e55/e63
e63 m6> Sl55
maybe the s63/s65 handles better than a 760i but who knows. Im willing to bet the 750i feels sportier than a s500/550
and these differences are so large that they can be easily felt in normal day to day driving. There is no need for turning into a 2 lane road at 60 mph for you to feel the differences. If you can't feel it in normal driving, then you are not very sensitive. I could sit blindfolded in a m5 and e55 and tell which car i was being driven around in. Heck aven e46 m3 to 335i is noticeable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLpEMa5Uy2o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbHHHchapHM
Last edited by Johncy2000; Dec 20, 2010 at 01:40 AM.
they cant admit that mercedes are better for line races.
although we admit BMW are great for twisties.
Edit:
forgot to mention. i am not a BMW hater. it is simply the E55 is better for my style of racing and life.
and you can check the picture below to see that i have an X6M that is modded which got 11.8 in the drag.
i choose it because it is simply faster and better than cayyen turbo, ML63, etc in the SUV group.
but it looks like you dont see what we drive and you think it is for the fact the we like the 2 stars more.
Last edited by Ali_E55; Dec 20, 2010 at 01:49 AM.

Both are great cars and have unique characteristics that set each other apart
Last edited by wmasmb430; Dec 20, 2010 at 02:10 AM.
Since 95% of BMW driver's cant drive to begin with it doesn't make a difference that they begin to talk about handling etc. Look at the speedometer when you turn and that's the true handling capabilities. It doesnt matter how it feels as long as it gets it done. The SL55 will do it very quietly while the M while just make it feel harder for you. The Steering of the Benz's is very soft, while the M's are firm. But they will accomplish the same. Go Look at Dino from Veloce tune and how he tracked his SL55 better than SRT 10 Vipers and F cars. Actually the SL55 out-handles both the M5 and M6, I bet you didn't know that either and runs better times on the Nurburgring.
BMW's are obselte in a sense they don't have the straight line power or the turns. It's Porsche who is actually MB's main competition because they make FAST machine and Handling MONSTERS, which can knock on AMG's door.
Look at the E92 vs C63 Comparison, it has better handling because of what ? In a super extreme condition Solomon it was 1 sec faster. When are you going to be drifting between cones at 69 MPH? It's like MB making MB's work in space in case the earth implodes tomorrow. THE BMW's handling is no better than a light weight Honda. At the end of the day its about brute force straight line power and braking which AMG Deliver and it will handle 1:1 for the BMW, except it will be miles ahead already
All those atilla E55 vids involve a known HEAVILY modded E55. Enough said.
That black M6 had 24 inch rims it looked like... Enough said...
Dead stops are NOT exactly easy for M5s/M6s...so no surprise. I did expect the AMG to pull off the line easily and it did.
The rest (if I missed any), were the drivers all driving properly??? P500S, S6 on , DSC off etc.?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDdVlAg8CgQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plo6f4t1ERo
That was my cls with 20s and tbal's (member on here now with an e55) M6 on 22s. Both cars were stock and my cls pulled on every run...
Curious, is there such a thing as a 10 second M5 that does NOT run cheater gas?
Most recent member to join the club
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0gVXQkyEvw
Last edited by pearlpower; Dec 20, 2010 at 04:45 AM.









