I got this message on my display today...
Is that normal?... do I just add a quart of oil and that's it?.. or is there anything else I need to check?
If you drive 4 miles to work without letting it warm up it is consuming more oil than it should your entire commute.
Letting it warm first will allow all engine to run at the tolerances it was designed for.
Trending Topics




+1 on letting the warm up each time.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If you drive 4 miles to work without letting it warm up it is consuming more oil than it should your entire commute.
Letting it warm first will allow all engine to run at the tolerances it was designed for.
I had the car for almost 2 years and this is the first time I seen that message.. I'll add some oil and keep an eye on it I guess
Letting a car completely warm up before putting under load can add years to the life of the engine. It decreases blow-by gases. The warmed fluid in the collant actually warms the trans fluid and helps to evaporate condensation in the tranny. It helps to warm the intake to keep cold A/F vapors from condensating on inside of intake runners. There a ton of reasons to let a car fully warm before putting under load. One of the biggest is volumtric efficiency.
You average warming cycle to open/close loop on a EFI car is 7 minutes.
If you're worried so much about "valuable resources" why would you buy a supercharged 5.5L to move a 4000 lb car? Kinda hypocritical.
Letting a car completely warm up before putting under load can add years to the life of the engine. It decreases blow-by gases. The warmed fluid in the collant actually warms the trans fluid and helps to evaporate condensation in the tranny. It helps to warm the intake to keep cold A/F vapors from condensating on inside of intake runners. There a ton of reasons to let a car fully warm before putting under load. One of the biggest is volumtric efficiency.
You average warming cycle to open/close loop on a EFI car is 7 minutes.
If you're worried so much about "valuable resources" why would you buy a supercharged 5.5L to move a 4000 lb car? Kinda hypocritical.
Sorry, but there is absolutely no proof in what you've just said. As a matter of fact, their is proof against it and even automotive companies agree that letting a car idle to warm up only wastes gasoline. Modern engines have VERY tight tolerances compared to older engines and this are very efficient even when cold. No amount of "warming before driving" will make an engine last longer than it already would without doing this ( which is pretty much forever ).
I'm not talking about romping on it, just regular driving. Going WOT with a cold engine CAN BE BAD in the long run.
Last edited by GT-ER; Mar 6, 2011 at 04:34 PM.
Your exhaust for instance, the paladium or rhodium(sp) in your cats is meant to warm at a certain rate in order to burn off unspent fuel and air from the motor. At start up a cold engine is given a rich mixture-- driving in this rich mixture mode(open loop) can cause the cats to superheat and eventually burn the cats or melt closed the honeycomb pathways.
Your entire valve train has what is called "lash", these are the tolerances between all moving parts. This lash is decreased as parts warm--dramatically decreasing the forces between these parts--which is meant to be cushioned and lubricated by just a couple thousandths of oil. These minute tolerances can mean the difference between tapping and hammering.
You transmission fluid is also warmed by the warming of the engines coolant. Inside your transmission are many high tolerant parts that rely on your engine warming them up to tolerance.
You entire EFI requires heat to eventually move to a closed loop system. Without a cetain level of heat you will not get enough atomization of the air and fuel... The air and fuel will simply stick to the sides of the runners between the throttle plate and combustion chamber--- thus never reaching a full or close to stoichiometric mixture of 14.7:1. Which runs us back to feeding to much gas to the Cats and burning them up.
I have WAY more experience with building motors than just reading magazines.
I tell you what, if you removed the EPA and the manufactures needing cars to wear out, I bet they would advise letting the car reach closed loop at minimum--- which is around 5 minutes.
Case in point, when I was younger my dad was friends with a guy named Bob Lazier, his son Buddy Lazier was an aspiring Indy car driver(at the time, but later won Indy in 96) Bob and Buddy used to bring me along to the races and practices. One of the things that I thought was really cool was when they would first start the engines they would boil the coolant and then pour it into the motor. WHY, to bring everything into tolerance and avoid any possible wear--- Adding valuable life to a motor.
Sorry, but there is absolutely no proof in what you've just said. As a matter of fact, their is proof against it and even automotive companies agree that letting a car idle to warm up only wastes gasoline. Modern engines have VERY tight tolerances compared to older engines and this are very efficient even when cold. No amount of "warming before driving" will make an engine last longer than it already would without doing this ( which is pretty much forever ).
I'm not talking about romping on it, just regular driving. Going WOT with a cold engine CAN BE BAD in the long run.
Last edited by randallaguirre; Mar 6, 2011 at 05:39 PM.
I think my lexus's owner's manual clearly states to start driving in a few minutes and warm up the car under low load, it will warm up faster than letting it sit at idle.
soooo...I think I am gonna go with the owners manual.
I too have built engines and transmissions and have more experience than just the regular "I've read it somewhere" knowledge.
What I'm saying is that the difference would be negligible to the point that it may not even be measurable. I've driven cars to nearly 200,000 miles and then disassembled the engine and it shows little wear on it and I have never EVER let a car warm up before use.
As a matter of fact, I once had a 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix which I drove to 120,000 miles and then turbocharged it and drove it to 170,000 miles and then blew a piston ( went lean and I ran a somewhat aggressive spark advance ). When started to tear that engine apart, all the bearings and cylinder walls looked so good that I decided to just replace the broken piston and nothing else and put the engine back in. Ran a leak down test and it passed with flying colors and ran like that for years on end ( sold it soon afterwards so I don't know how many miles it eventually went up to ).
So again, if the difference is an engine lasting 300K+ miles vs. 350K+ miles....then does it even matter? And if it did, what makes you think it wouldn't last longer regardless of warming it up or not?
You entire EFI requires heat to eventually move to a closed loop system. Without a cetain level of heat you will not get enough atomization of the air and fuel... The air and fuel will simply stick to the sides of the runners between the throttle plate and combustion chamber--- thus never reaching a full or close to stoichiometric mixture of 14.7:1. Which runs us back to feeding to much gas to the Cats and burning them up.
A cold motor will simply not deliver a stoichiometric air ratio. (which is 14.7:1 and the point at which you are maximizing the potential burn rate of every atom of gas)
The most modern of engines have done everything they can to keep moving the injectors closer and closer to and sometimes INSIDE the intake ports to keep the warmup(open loop) process as short as possible.
But, there has to be at least enough distance so the the air charge and mix with the spray pattern of the injector and do everything they can to mix the air and fuel to a perfect 14.7:1 (stoichiometric)
Also, another reason vehicles stay in open loop fuel mapping is to allow the exhaust gasses to reach high enough temp to get an accurate reading which I believe is well over 1000 kelvins.
I used to work for Jim Shofner at AZ Speed and Speed and Marine-- I know fuel injection.
I imagine you fought these motor mounts too..? Funny thing it would make the steering wheel vibrate VIOLENTLY!
I too have built engines and transmissions and have more experience than just the regular "I've read it somewhere" knowledge.
What I'm saying is that the difference would be negligible to the point that it may not even be measurable. I've driven cars to nearly 200,000 miles and then disassembled the engine and it shows little wear on it and I have never EVER let a car warm up before use.
As a matter of fact, I once had a 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix which I drove to 120,000 miles and then turbocharged it and drove it to 170,000 miles and then blew a piston ( went lean and I ran a somewhat aggressive spark advance ). When started to tear that engine apart, all the bearings and cylinder walls looked so good that I decided to just replace the broken piston and nothing else and put the engine back in. Ran a leak down test and it passed with flying colors and ran like that for years on end ( sold it soon afterwards so I don't know how many miles it eventually went up to ).
So again, if the difference is an engine lasting 300K+ miles vs. 350K+ miles....then does it even matter? And if it did, what makes you think it wouldn't last longer regardless of warming it up or not?
The most modern of engines have done everything they can to keep moving the injectors closer and closer to and sometimes INSIDE the intake ports to keep the warmup(open loop) process as short as possible.
But, there has to be at least enough distance so the the air charge and mix with the spray pattern of the injector and do everything they can to mix the air and fuel to a perfect 14.7:1 (stoichiometric)
Also, another reason vehicles stay in open loop fuel mapping is to allow the exhaust gasses to reach high enough temp to get an accurate reading which I believe is well over 1000 kelvins.
I used to work for Jim Shofner at AZ Speed and Speed and Marine-- I know fuel injection.
You can get a stone cold engine to run at 14.7:1 with ease, it's just not ideal to do due to emissions and quick startup when cold...but it has nothing to do with the ability of the fuel injectors to properly atomize the fuel. This used to be a problem in older carbureted engines and CIS type fueling systems but modern injectors will perfectly atomize fuel even in winter colds.
I imagine you fought these motor mounts too..? Funny thing it would make the steering wheel vibrate VIOLENTLY!
We got WAY off topic though so I don't wish to keep arguing senslessly, this is as far as I go with this.
Last edited by GT-ER; Mar 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM.
A cold motor will simply not deliver a stoichiometric air ratio. (which is 14.7:1 and the point at which you are maximizing the potential burn rate of every atom of gas)
The most modern of engines have done everything they can to keep moving the injectors closer and closer to and sometimes INSIDE the intake ports to keep the warmup(open loop) process as short as possible.
But, there has to be at least enough distance so the the air charge and mix with the spray pattern of the injector and do everything they can to mix the air and fuel to a perfect 14.7:1 (stoichiometric)
Also, another reason vehicles stay in open loop fuel mapping is to allow the exhaust gasses to reach high enough temp to get an accurate reading which I believe is well over 1000 kelvins.
I used to work for Jim Shofner at AZ Speed and Speed and Marine-- I know fuel injection.
WOW, there is a TON of bad info in that post, Hell it's as if Jangy wrote that post







