Thats it, WRECKLESS DRIVING??
I was just addressing people who started posting things like, "a cop can't just go off what other people say" and "it's hearsay". Ummmm, that is NOT true. Legally it's NOT if someone goes so far as to dial 911, files a report with a uniformed officer, and offers to testify against you under oath in Court. There are some people who have nothing better to do. People seem to have a strange notion of the US legal system. More often than not it is going to come down to the investigating officer and whether or not he wants to file the paper work, as well as how big of a stink the observing party is on the matter. You have a few different dynamics going on.
Back in Ohio, I knew of a guy that was arrested for flipping off a woman while screaming "F*ck You" at her and then cutting her off. She happened to be the wife of a police officer. Let's say...it didn't end well for him. That is just one of the facts of life.
I'm not, but it doesn't seem this clear cut to me. If the person files a complaint, the police speak to the subject, who denies it, then it becomes a he said/she said case. Unless the complainant can find corroborating witnesses, there is really no evidence.
you say i'm speeding, I say I'm not. Without any further evidence, there is no clear guilty verdict.
We all bought these cars for speed and luxury. If I would have had 500hp at 17, I wouldn't be here today. Anyone, at any age can drive a fast car, it's when the situation changes that experience comes into play and at 17 you don't have that yet.
A 35 zone is there for a reason - It's not the place to test your cars limits.
I will tell you this - If I had been anywhere near that with my 2 year old little girl, watching a guy fly around a corner like that, it wouldn't have been the cops knocking at your door.
Enjoy the car, but pick the time a place better.
No way a child this age, should own this car. I don't care if he bought it with his own money. A 17 year old child, with less than 2 years driving experience, has no business behind the wheel of this particular automobile. And that's what you are, regardless if you want to admit or not. I knew it all when I was 17 too, trust me.
Now, if you tell me that you've taken defensive driving courses, and have had professional instruction, then I'll bend. But based on your original post, I doubt it.
Drive a Honda Civic for a few years, then go big. But until then, please stay out of my neighborhood. I've got kids, and no fence.
Last edited by Benz-O-Rama; Jun 7, 2011 at 03:00 PM.
So you've been driving for 2.5 years, so you think you know how to react when situations come up. newsflash, every teenager thinks they are a great driver. statistically, this is far from true.
I like how you are so callous about dying like its no big deal. Thats final kid, theres no reset button on this ****. This ain't forza on xbox.
Finally, what happens when the rear swings out and a car containing a mother and child just happen to appear. Killing yourself is one thing, killing someone else is another. You ready to live the rest of your life knowing that your stupid actions caused the death of someone's wife, mother, or child?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




We all bought these cars for speed and luxury. If I would have had 500hp at 17, I wouldn't be here today. Anyone, at any age can drive a fast car, it's when the situation changes that experience comes into play and at 17 you don't have that yet.
A 35 zone is there for a reason - It's not the place to test your cars limits.
I will tell you this - If I had been anywhere near that with my 2 year old little girl, watching a guy fly around a corner like that, it wouldn't have been the cops knocking at your door.
Enjoy the car, but pick the time a place better.
+1
His dady bought it new and then probally gave it to him. Remember when he first started posting and kept saying he bought it new then he started an appology post for lying and saying finally that his daddy actually bought it new and drove it some 100k miles before giving it to him. I knew then he was a real winner. Gave him a break due to his age but this post clealy shows he should not even be on a public forum better yet driving an AMG. These 03s are so cheap now this is what we have to look forward to.
I was just addressing people who started posting things like, "a cop can't just go off what other people say" and "it's hearsay". Ummmm, that is NOT true. Legally it's NOT if someone goes so far as to dial 911, files a report with a uniformed officer, and offers to testify against you under oath in Court. There are some people who have nothing better to do. People seem to have a strange notion of the US legal system. More often than not it is going to come down to the investigating officer and whether or not he wants to file the paper work, as well as how big of a stink the observing party is on the matter. You have a few different dynamics going on.
Back in Ohio, I knew of a guy that was arrested for flipping off a woman while screaming "F*ck You" at her and then cutting her off. She happened to be the wife of a police officer. Let's say...it didn't end well for him. That is just one of the facts of life.
I have represented no less than 3 matters which refer to these complaints, the only chance the police have in succeeding is if the complainant is called and appears to testify.
The first thing the judge will ask is where is the person making the complaint, if they are not present the judge will usually (and did in 2 circumstances) throw the case out.
Secondly, even if the person making the complaint appears, it will still depend on the account given and other circumstances as to whether the judge will impose a fine, from my experience none of them received any penalty but a warning.
As for your story about the police officer, I don't know what you mean by didn't end well for him, it is very unlikely this would ever happen in Australia.
I was just addressing people who started posting things like, "a cop can't just go off what other people say" and "it's hearsay". Ummmm, that is NOT true. Legally it's NOT if someone goes so far as to dial 911, files a report with a uniformed officer, and offers to testify against you under oath in Court. There are some people who have nothing better to do. People seem to have a strange notion of the US legal system. More often than not it is going to come down to the investigating officer and whether or not he wants to file the paper work, as well as how big of a stink the observing party is on the matter. You have a few different dynamics going on.
Back in Ohio, I knew of a guy that was arrested for flipping off a woman while screaming "F*ck You" at her and then cutting her off. She happened to be the wife of a police officer. Let's say...it didn't end well for him. That is just one of the facts of life.
There is a reason why police testimony is different from that of a civilian (in Australia anyway), in certain matters police are considered to be expert witnesses such as determining drivers speeds even without radar, as they receive special training at this. Therefore, their testimony will be given different weight than that of a lay persons.
It is notoriously difficult for a police to achieve a conviction when all they have to rely on is a persons statement that someone was going over the speed limit, no judge would ever give a conviction based purely on this.
Last edited by iAMGod; Jun 7, 2011 at 05:55 PM.
Basically in that situation they have to prove it. Heresy doesn't mean shiat.
Next time, I'd tell him to pound sand.
And you chatting with him didn't get you off of anything. He didn't see you do anything. And he knew that giving you a ticket would not hold up in any court.
Again, never admit anything. No matter what. Remember, everything you say can and will be used against you.
word
Real talk kid your not responsible enough to be driving the car you claim , and if i was your pops and was home when cop came i woulda whooped yer *** before cop left the driveway and took the keys to the car .. But personally if you paid for the car yourself you would be more mature about owning it ..
No way a child this age, should own this car. I don't care if he bought it with his own money. A 17 year old child, with less than 2 years driving experience, has no business behind the wheel of this particular automobile. And that's what you are, regardless if you want to admit or not. I knew it all when I was 17 too, trust me.
Now, if you tell me that you've taken defensive driving courses, and have had professional instruction, then I'll bend. But based on your original post, I doubt it.
Drive a Honda Civic for a few years, then go big. But until then, please stay out of my neighborhood. I've got kids, and no fence.
You probably haven't had any friends who have died in street racing accidents, or "wreckless driving" accidents? You probably have never lost control of your car while being a stupid street racer? You probably haven't crashed your car while being a stupid street racer?
I have, all of those, and I'm still young enough to remember those days freshly. With that mentality, if you take yourself in a crash, the only sad thing will be that you'd have gone too young and inexperienced to have developed some rationale thoughts to look back and this and laugh in shame. However, the tragedy would be that you might take someone/s with you, and that's what's important, considering YOU have the admitted murderous/criminal/volatile intent.
I begged, fought, pleaded, and worked my a$$ off to get a Mustang GT as my first bought car when I was young (my hand-me-down was an '87 embarrassing Gold Audi 5000), and I though I was spoiled! The power in that car could have killed me (and my friends), and I can only imagine an E55. Admitting this is a little hypocritical, considering what I just said, shame on your parents!
Last edited by K-A; Jun 8, 2011 at 05:25 AM.





