Fighting with the warranty company




I recently had to replace my front air suspension since they were leaking. I bought a platinum plan from USA Warranty and in it, it says it covers suspension components. When we tried to make a claim, they denied the claim saying that they are struts and a wear item. My mechanic has been trying to fight them on this but they are declining the claim. I was wondering if any of you have been through this? To me the suspension on our cars is not supposed to be a wear item. I just wanted to gather info from the knowledgeable folks on this forum to have some ammunition before calling them back up. If I don't have a claim, then I will just let it go but I think I have a claim right now...
Thanks!
You better to start shopping for rebuilt struts -- They are supposed to be cheap and awesome.




Last edited by Yuille36; Jul 28, 2011 at 01:38 PM.
If they say they cover suspension items, what suspension items do they cover? Every single piece on the suspension is a "wear" item. Unless the fine print specifies that they won't warrant air stuts or dampers, I'd sue their *****.
This is why I will never buy an extended warranty. I rather just fix the car myself.
Last edited by shardul; Jul 28, 2011 at 02:34 PM.




Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




@GUYSANDIEGO - I never would have thought to ask specifically about suspension.
@Yuille36 - I went on recommendation of many folks here to get one. I have already had a couple of successful claims. All it takes is for seats to go bad, ECU, supercharger, fuel tank etc ... just a few items and you can make it back. I have fixed every other car I had myself. Factory warranty was not an option open to me when I purchased the car.
@GT-ER - I agree with your thoughts .. same as mine. Struts are listed as wear item. But the box says Air suspension.
@Shardul - Sneaky ******* :P LOL joke! .. .I can always rely on you for an answer! I may go this route if I have to.
@ClkWork - Yeah - they suck you in with "Bumper to bumper" Then comes the fine print that's kind of unethical in my book.
here's what he said
"Airmatic struts are not actually shock absorbers, and they are not called shock absorbers in the part description even though we all call them that. They do not perform shocking action, and they do not have a defined lifespan like a brake rotor where they are considered a consumable item. they are supposed to last for the life of the car, and if they don't it's because they failed and so are covered."
here's what he said
"Airmatic struts are not actually shock absorbers, and they are not called shock absorbers in the part description even though we all call them that. They do not perform shocking action, and they do not have a defined lifespan like a brake rotor where they are considered a consumable item. they are supposed to last for the life of the car, and if they don't it's because they failed and so are covered."
True.
My warranty is through NAC also and I was very careful to confirm that AirMatic failures were covered before I agreed to sign anything.
Based on my first service visit with my car ($1100) of which NAC covered about $800 without a compliant.... I'm convinced that the warranty will easily pay for itself over the next few years.
-G
here's what he said
"Airmatic struts are not actually shock absorbers, and they are not called shock absorbers in the part description even though we all call them that. They do not perform shocking action, and they do not have a defined lifespan like a brake rotor where they are considered a consumable item. they are supposed to last for the life of the car, and if they don't it's because they failed and so are covered."
I can see them having a case for the fronts. If they won't pay to replace shocks, you can not replace the air springs. The rear is simply a spring (an air operated spring.)
NAC doesn't cover "door handles" but when my keyless go buttons broke on the handles it was filed as a claim as a faulty locking switch. Obviously you can't fix the switch without replacing the handle so they were sort-of-compelled to cover it.
I'm sure there is a way to carefully word the claim to get it through. After all, if the entire car collapses due to an airbag failure then it's function is at least partly that of a "spring".... And not just for damping suspension oscillations.
The shop you work with probably makes a big difference too. Some shops are more willing to fight on your behalf and come up with a claim that will avoid the exclusions of the warranty. Other shops can't be bothered and don't even want to be forced to deal with a 3rd party warranty company.
-G
here's what he said
"Airmatic struts are not actually shock absorbers, and they are not called shock absorbers in the part description even though we all call them that. They do not perform shocking action, and they do not have a defined lifespan like a brake rotor where they are considered a consumable item. they are supposed to last for the life of the car, and if they don't it's because they failed and so are covered."
Got my Fidelity Platinum warranty from him and he was dead on with his recommendation.
You better to start shopping for rebuilt struts -- They are supposed to be cheap and awesome.
My warranty is through NAC also and I was very careful to confirm that AirMatic failures were covered before I agreed to sign anything.
Based on my first service visit with my car ($1100) of which NAC covered about $800 without a compliant.... I'm convinced that the warranty will easily pay for itself over the next few years.
-G
Is it considered poor form to quote your own posts?


I just called NAC about a few new "items" that are broken on my car:
1. Horn (either the High or Low tone) is not working
2. Front accessory 12V (in ashtray) does not work
3. Oil Leaks from valve covers on both sides
All three are covered 100%.... admittedly, the first one is a pretty simple fix (not sure what the part costs) but the 12V adapter is not a fuse or socket issue, so there's probably going to be quite a bit of labor to replace the affected harness. And, from what I've read on this forum already the leaking valve covers are a time-intensive process to get the parts off, cleaned and re-installed.... a few solid hours anyway, plus parts.
I wouldn't be surprised if the bill was up in the $700 - $800 range for this series of repairs (parts & labor)
This NAC warranty is paying for itself in a big hurry.
Last edited by GregMB; Aug 5, 2011 at 12:46 PM. Reason: clarifying...


