W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M113K Upper Fixed / Clutchless S/C Pulley

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-25-2013, 03:14 PM
  #1  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
M113K Upper Fixed / Clutchless S/C Pulley

With all the Biturbo, single Turbo, built blocks, after market blower threads etc etc project going on. We figured we would work on something too and offer it to the MB community.

-Ultra lightweight and removes over 3 lbs of rotating mass from the SC , that turns at almost twice as fast as the crank pulley.
-Super quick spool up time to max boost levels.
-Fixed SC pulley sizes range from 168mm to 200mm crank pulley equivalent, and all from an easy SC pulley change.
-Low inertia fixed pulley, frees up lost power, while not adding heat from extra boost needed to turn heavier parts
-Quicker response time going into wide open throttle
-Install is easy and does not require removal of super charger or permenant modification of sc shaft
-The pulley is held on by interference fit, factory bolt and factory roll pin design. You just align the part like the fatory unit and just torque onto the shaft. Very easy and no shims needed.
-pulley will work without the magnet on the SC shaft
-This unit will be 100% compatible with the belt wrap kit.
-Pulley will be avaliable for sale within the next 20 days.
-Pricing will be relased soon.




Last edited by shardul; 03-27-2013 at 11:44 AM.
Old 03-25-2013, 03:21 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
black06c230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,943
Received 214 Likes on 169 Posts
2012 Volt - 2005 E55 - 2011 G55 - 2013 GL63
Interesting. Does mean the SC is always engaged since there is no clutch? How is the driveability?

Last edited by black06c230; 03-25-2013 at 03:24 PM.
Old 03-25-2013, 03:33 PM
  #3  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
shardul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,139
Received 293 Likes on 242 Posts
2003 W211 E55, 2003 W220 S600
Originally Posted by black06c230
Interesting. Does mean the SC is always engaged since there is no clutch? How is the driveability?
yes. with a ecu remap driveability will be good.
Old 03-25-2013, 03:37 PM
  #4  
Member
 
War Tank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
e55
Great work Shardul, can't wait for the final numbers to come out.
Old 03-25-2013, 03:37 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
efiftyfizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 956
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
W212 E63 AMG S Model
Interesting stuff... I think we can all agree that a record low for MPG is right around the corner!
Old 03-25-2013, 03:40 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Manuyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 1,610
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
06 e55,81SC Targa,08 CLK63 BLK,91 E34 M5
i want....
but gonna suck on gas lol
Old 03-25-2013, 03:40 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
SilverStrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
05 E55, 07 ML500
And to think I just bought your smaller pulley, which I might add is very nice.. Will be curious when it's released.. Decisions decisions..
Old 03-25-2013, 03:47 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Crissus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 698
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
Highly interesting for sure. But for a daily driver im not sure. Fuel consumption will significantly rise.
I remember AMGs claim that our compressor eats around +-100HP at max-RPM alone to spin.
Dunno how that is at lower RPM though, but i guess a clutch is there for a reason.

Hopefully the guys from Eurocharged can chime in here and talk a bit what their findings are.
Old 03-25-2013, 03:51 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
thumper823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: west michigan
Posts: 450
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
04 E55
wow this is very exciting, im interested in how exaclty this will affect the fuel mileage tho? i dont doubt that it would change but what will "make" it lose fuel economy????

losing that magnet should make a huge difference!!!
Old 03-25-2013, 03:58 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Crissus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 698
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
Originally Posted by thumper823
....but what will "make" it lose fuel economy????
The power needed to actually move the Kompressor.
Like stated before, AMG once said its 100HP of crank power wasted for propulsion of the Kompressor at max-RPM (~6200RPM).
Thats why there was/is a clutch for normal driving.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:02 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
efiftyfizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 956
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
W212 E63 AMG S Model
Originally Posted by Crissus
The power needed to actually move the Kompressor.
Like stated before, AMG once said its 100HP of crank power wasted for propulsion of the Kompressor at max-RPM (~6200RPM).
Thats why there was/is a clutch for normal driving.
Right... currently the supercharger engages via throttle response / RPM based on your driving habits. That's why the highway MPG of this car can be good if you're cruising around 70-80 as the supercharger can remain off.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:19 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Alex Kapparos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Southport, NC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Subscribed for this. I think it is a great idea as long as the mapping makes it driveable. As far as MPG goes, as long as I can make it from gas station to gas station it's all good.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:21 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dirt Scooters
Not knocking it but there's no "spool-up". Its crank driven not pressure driven like a turbo. Either way its good to see people still trying to come up with new things for these cars. Hope the correct R&D is done. Whats the weight difference between this and your smaller s/c pulley?
Old 03-25-2013, 04:29 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Sir-Boost-a-Lot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,092
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
Just cruising at part throttle will take a fraction of that number to turn the supercharger, as in less than 10hp with the bypass valve open. The only losses are the power needed to spin the aluminum rotors themselves since the system is under no pressure.

It takes a lot of power to turn at RPM because it's a positive displacement blower compressing air into a plenum already under pressure.

Originally Posted by Crissus
The power needed to actually move the Kompressor.
Like stated before, AMG once said its 100HP of crank power wasted for propulsion of the Kompressor at max-RPM (~6200RPM).
Thats why there was/is a clutch for normal driving.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:47 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SterlingE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,693
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
2006 E55, 2012 Jeep SRT, 2008 G37s 6MT (The Mrs.), 2005 Explorer
Originally Posted by Sir-Boost-a-Lot
Just cruising at part throttle will take a fraction of that number to turn the supercharger, as in less than 10hp with the bypass valve open. The only losses are the power needed to spin the aluminum rotors themselves since the system is under no pressure.

It takes a lot of power to turn at RPM because it's a positive displacement blower compressing air into a plenum already under pressure.
^This.

As far as MPG's the weistec is clutchless and didn't lose MPG's. I'm sure your right foot will have a bigger affect than the clutchless SC. I rarely take mine on long trips so eff mpgs.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:48 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
Crissus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 698
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
C215 CL55 AMG, W124 500E, W210 E430, W124 300E
Originally Posted by Sir-Boost-a-Lot
Just cruising at part throttle will take a fraction of that number to turn the supercharger, as in less than 10hp with the bypass valve open. The only losses are the power needed to spin the aluminum rotors themselves since the system is under no pressure.

It takes a lot of power to turn at RPM because it's a positive displacement blower compressing air into a plenum already under pressure.
Thanks for that clarification. However i would like to hear from real-world test environments about this change.

If there is no big change (within 10% range after a good tune) for casual driving, i wait and rather buy this instead of the smaller SC pulley with clutch.
Old 03-25-2013, 04:50 PM
  #17  
PLATINUM SPONSOR
 
Exotic-metal55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,810
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
2003 CL55
Fixed SC, is about 2 lbs lighter than the smaller Sc pulley we have out.

With a much lighter clutchless pulley, no clutch to slip, reduced engine inertia on the crank and rotaing assembly; engine will rev quicker and allow the SC to spin up or reach desired RPM quicker. The Sc spins about 2 times to each turn of the crank (depending on crank size), so this is a good place to take off weight as well.
__________________



E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.

CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.

www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
Old 03-25-2013, 04:55 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SterlingE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,693
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
2006 E55, 2012 Jeep SRT, 2008 G37s 6MT (The Mrs.), 2005 Explorer
Brooke,
What's it take to take the magnet off the SC? Probably what 2-4lbs savings there as well?
Old 03-25-2013, 05:22 PM
  #19  
PLATINUM SPONSOR
 
Exotic-metal55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,810
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
2003 CL55
Originally Posted by SterlingE55
Brooke,
What's it take to take the magnet off the SC? Probably what 2-4lbs savings there as well?
It takes a puller to remove it. Of course MB has a tool for it but $$$$.
__________________



E63 Biturbo, UPD Cold Air induction kit, UPD performance crank pulley and UPD adjustable rear suspension with ride height adjustment.

CL55 UPD Cold Air Boost kit, UPD 3000 stall converter, UPD 77mm SC clutched pulley and beltwrap kit, Custom long tubes, UPD crank pulley , UPD suspension kit, UPD SC pulley, Aux. HE, Trunk tank w/rule 2000 pump, Mezeire pump, UPD 5pc idler set, Aluminum rotor hats.

www.ultimatepd.com
instagram @ultimate_pd
facebook.com/ultimatepd
Old 03-25-2013, 05:22 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
e55amgrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northern Va
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Dirt Scooters
More than 2-4lbs. That would be the ticket in my opinion.
Old 03-25-2013, 05:33 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SterlingE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,693
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
2006 E55, 2012 Jeep SRT, 2008 G37s 6MT (The Mrs.), 2005 Explorer
Originally Posted by Exotic-metal55
It takes a puller to remove it. Of course MB has a tool for it but $$$$.
I'll see if Jerry can pull it off when he has my car next week.

Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
More than 2-4lbs. That would be the ticket in my opinion.
Agreed.
Old 03-25-2013, 05:34 PM
  #22  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by e55amgrocket
Not knocking it but there's no "spool-up". Its crank driven not pressure driven like a turbo. Either way its good to see people still trying to come up with new things for these cars. Hope the correct R&D is done. Whats the weight difference between this and your smaller s/c pulley?
Maybe "spool up" goes from instant to pre mediated?
Old 03-25-2013, 05:47 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
PACougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,109
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
1000Hp Diesel Trucks, 2019 E63s
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
Maybe "spool up" goes from instant to pre mediated?
So what are you saying, if someone is going to buy one they should go check to see if their car is spooling up in the driveway right now!
Old 03-25-2013, 05:55 PM
  #24  
Member
 
schino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E55, 11 second truck, ducati streetfighter 1098
Originally Posted by Sir-Boost-a-Lot
Just cruising at part throttle will take a fraction of that number to turn the supercharger, as in less than 10hp with the bypass valve open. The only losses are the power needed to spin the aluminum rotors themselves since the system is under no pressure.

It takes a lot of power to turn at RPM because it's a positive displacement blower compressing air into a plenum already under pressure.
setup looks good!

thats right, when its pulling vacuum its much easier to spin. once it starts getting under pressure is when the hp comes in but that would be the same with clutch or not. a for instance the tvs1900 which is the latest generation eaton with 4 lobe hybrid roots only takes 2 hp to drive with bypass open going down the road.
Old 03-25-2013, 06:45 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Forrest Gump 9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,190
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
shrimp boat
Are there different sizes?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: M113K Upper Fixed / Clutchless S/C Pulley



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.