Just spoke w/Speedriven... Latest news is SICK!
#101
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
07 E63 + 07 CLK63CAB
Sorry guys, misread the chart, I am a fool the air/fuel was richer after 5500.
With all the issues with cooling and you supercharged guys running tanks in the trunk or reservoirs in the engine compartment, what actually cools the tank besides filling with ice, once that melts the temp goes up. The lines running from the engine to the tank provide a method of cooling but most I see are rubber. Would it be an idea to run 1 inch copper tubes with aluminum fins wrap around to provide a method to dissipate the heat to and from the tank in the first place, also have not seen any tank with external cooling. Correct me if I am on the wrong track, just wondering out loud?
Not trying to be smart, just a question!
With all the issues with cooling and you supercharged guys running tanks in the trunk or reservoirs in the engine compartment, what actually cools the tank besides filling with ice, once that melts the temp goes up. The lines running from the engine to the tank provide a method of cooling but most I see are rubber. Would it be an idea to run 1 inch copper tubes with aluminum fins wrap around to provide a method to dissipate the heat to and from the tank in the first place, also have not seen any tank with external cooling. Correct me if I am on the wrong track, just wondering out loud?
Not trying to be smart, just a question!
#102
Banned
Sorry guys, misread the chart, I am a fool the air/fuel was richer after 5500.
With all the issues with cooling and you supercharged guys running tanks in the trunk or reservoirs in the engine compartment, what actually cools the tank besides filling with ice, once that melts the temp goes up. The lines running from the engine to the tank provide a method of cooling but most I see are rubber. Would it be an idea to run 1 inch copper tubes with aluminum fins wrap around to provide a method to dissipate the heat to and from the tank in the first place, also have not seen any tank with external cooling. Correct me if I am on the wrong track, just wondering out loud?
Not trying to be smart, just a question!
With all the issues with cooling and you supercharged guys running tanks in the trunk or reservoirs in the engine compartment, what actually cools the tank besides filling with ice, once that melts the temp goes up. The lines running from the engine to the tank provide a method of cooling but most I see are rubber. Would it be an idea to run 1 inch copper tubes with aluminum fins wrap around to provide a method to dissipate the heat to and from the tank in the first place, also have not seen any tank with external cooling. Correct me if I am on the wrong track, just wondering out loud?
Not trying to be smart, just a question!
#105
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Check the website. The 63 kit stage stage 1-3 requires removal of secondary air injection but not the 50-state legal stage 0 kit. However, the 55 kit does not mention anything about removing the secondary air injection pump. I imagine that if you wanted to upgrade to a 82TB, bigger injectors and colder plugs with reservoir tank, exhaust heads then removing the pump would be necessary. When my car is completed I doubt it will pass smog here in So. Cal.
#107
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Are you talking about the appearance or the performance? There is a good reason why Weistec has the inlet to one side. The throttle body inlet in front of the firewall is extremely restrictive. Even Speedriven is contending with this issue today.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
#108
MBWorld Fanatic!
Check the website. The 63 kit stage stage 1-3 requires removal of secondary air injection but not the 50-state legal stage 0 kit. However, the 55 kit does not mention anything about removing the secondary air injection pump. I imagine that if you wanted to upgrade to a 82TB, bigger injectors and colder plugs with reservoir tank, exhaust heads then removing the pump would be necessary. When my car is completed I doubt it will pass smog here in So. Cal.
#109
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
06 e55 amg
Are you talking about the appearance or the performance? There is a good reason why Weistec has the inlet to one side. The throttle body inlet in front of the firewall is extremely restrictive. Even Speedriven is contending with this issue today.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
#110
Banned
Are you talking about the appearance or the performance? There is a good reason why Weistec has the inlet to one side. The throttle body inlet in front of the firewall is extremely restrictive. Even Speedriven is contending with this issue today.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
I visited my car at Weistec today and they have some things in the works that will completely eliminate the Hot Air Intake issue, However they will not be altering their intake to a dual inlet design in my opinion.
#111
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,416
Received 1,001 Likes
on
808 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Every 10° increase in intake temps cost you around 1% power. Cold air starting and finishing the compression process is the key to making power in forced induction engines.
Last edited by BlownV8; 07-26-2013 at 11:19 AM.
#112
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Both companies have good designs and I don't know how restrictive the throttle body placement and the angle of the inlet will affect flow but Weistec's argument seems to make some sense however my first look at the placment of the cone filter in the center of the engine over the top of the exhaust manifold immediately screamed of heat soak even before I heard about all the AITs with OEM 55k customers. That is why they are addressing it by experimenting with several new designs to create a "RAM cold air intake effect".
Yes, starting with hot air in a forced induction engine is very bad. The hot air will get even hotter when it is compressed. You overload the intercoolers ability to cool the intake charge.
Every 10° increase in intake temps cost you around 1% power. Cold air starting and finishing the compression process is the key to making power in forced induction engines.
Every 10° increase in intake temps cost you around 1% power. Cold air starting and finishing the compression process is the key to making power in forced induction engines.
#113
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Even though I'm now a customer of Weistec, I prefer the symetrical look of the dual intakes. That's what I had before they removed my Kleemann Autorotor for this Whipple.
I've also read that the Autorotor design is actually MORE efficient than the Whipple/Lysholm design but Weistec states the other way around.
Can somebody chime in on which one is more efficient and why?
I've also read that the Autorotor design is actually MORE efficient than the Whipple/Lysholm design but Weistec states the other way around.
Can somebody chime in on which one is more efficient and why?
#114
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,416
Received 1,001 Likes
on
808 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
In order of efficiency.
1. Rotrex 80% +
2. a. Autorotor 70% - 80%
2. b. Lysholm 70% - 80%
3. Vortech/Procharger 60% - 80%
4. Eaton 40% - 55%
In comparison to the Autorotor and Lysholm with similar displacement, the same size Autorotor will outperform the Lysholm.
1. Rotrex 80% +
2. a. Autorotor 70% - 80%
2. b. Lysholm 70% - 80%
3. Vortech/Procharger 60% - 80%
4. Eaton 40% - 55%
In comparison to the Autorotor and Lysholm with similar displacement, the same size Autorotor will outperform the Lysholm.
#115
MBWorld Fanatic!
Where did you acquire this information?
#121
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: S Florida
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01 audi a4, 06 e55
#122
Banned
The customer chewed thru his tranny. We will be rebuilding it soon
The car has been running for months customer put around 5k miles on it until his trans went
After the dyno customer took the car, enjoyed the whole summer and dropped it off a month ago to rebuild the trans.
The car has been running for months customer put around 5k miles on it until his trans went
After the dyno customer took the car, enjoyed the whole summer and dropped it off a month ago to rebuild the trans.