Anyone run a v.2 CTS-V yet?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 2
From: L.I. NY
2011 CTSV auto, 06 E55 white pano, 87 Grand national, 63 split window
Say it again becuz they dont hear u tho lol, Benz is a way better car overall even thought the ctsv may be a little faster and handle a little better, keep in mind that the 55k was made from 04-06 and the ctsv-2 started in 09. That being said Cadillac was smart enough to build the ctsv-2 to be better than that current year w211 (E63), the BMW E60 and the Audi RS6. I use the word "Better" loosely lol. I rather my 55k all day, its just an overall better car, not to mention its panty dropping points. #BenzLife #BenzLove
So BlueML: Great statement!
...and I will not dispute the handling of the CTS-V...my 2004 handled incredible! I didn't really try any handling on the new one I drove but if it is better (which we can all assume) then it must be even more incredible. I, for one, am not a handling guy so it is not a big deal for me. Don't care for turns!
Last edited by 60nomad; Jul 2, 2013 at 09:14 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 438
Likes: 4
From: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
I’m no AMG or Caddy nut hugger. With that being said, a CTS-V does not have the panache of an E55k, but it is in no way inferior to a W211. A W212 is a little better, but not a W211. The interior of a W211 is very nice and feels good, but I am not missing it one bit driving the Caddy. I think the basic difference on the inside is that the Mercedes has more of a luxurious feel and the Caddy has more of a sporty feel to it similar to driving a M3 with newer tech. Now a base CTS is inferior to base W211 or W212, but not a V. This will all change with the 2014 V-Sport that is about to hit the streets, but I digress.
The exterior is love me or hate me. I think those who hate it dislike it for one or both of these reasons:
1. It’s very angular.
2. It’s aggressively designed.
3. It’s an American brand. (Period)
If the same exact car was made by a European make like Audi or Maserati with the same exact design and specs sans the emblems a course I believe most people worldwide would view this car more favorably. It's similar to the way people currently view Hyundai vs. other brands. For similar money most would rather drive a less attractive vehicle than be seen in a Hyundai. The same outlook holds true for any American car that embark on territory traditionally dominated by the Europeans. We all know the historical reasons why so I will leave it at that.
Now overall, my CTS-V gets WAY more attention on the streets then my E55k ever did, but who cares. Justin simply wanted to hear our opinions of how we thought the E55k performed against the 2009-2014 CTS-V.
In closing, a V series Cadillac will never ever have the flair of an AMG or M, but a V is darn good cost effective alternative.
The exterior is love me or hate me. I think those who hate it dislike it for one or both of these reasons:
1. It’s very angular.
2. It’s aggressively designed.
3. It’s an American brand. (Period)
If the same exact car was made by a European make like Audi or Maserati with the same exact design and specs sans the emblems a course I believe most people worldwide would view this car more favorably. It's similar to the way people currently view Hyundai vs. other brands. For similar money most would rather drive a less attractive vehicle than be seen in a Hyundai. The same outlook holds true for any American car that embark on territory traditionally dominated by the Europeans. We all know the historical reasons why so I will leave it at that.
Now overall, my CTS-V gets WAY more attention on the streets then my E55k ever did, but who cares. Justin simply wanted to hear our opinions of how we thought the E55k performed against the 2009-2014 CTS-V.
In closing, a V series Cadillac will never ever have the flair of an AMG or M, but a V is darn good cost effective alternative.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
It’s an American brand. (Period)
If the same exact car was made by a European make like Audi or Maserati with the same exact design and specs sans the emblems a course I believe most people worldwide would view this car more favorably. It's similar to the way people currently view Hyundai vs. other brands. For similar money most would rather drive a less attractive vehicle than be seen in a Hyundai. The same outlook holds true for any American car that embark on territory traditionally dominated by the Europeans. We all know the historical reasons why so I will leave it at that.
If the same exact car was made by a European make like Audi or Maserati with the same exact design and specs sans the emblems a course I believe most people worldwide would view this car more favorably. It's similar to the way people currently view Hyundai vs. other brands. For similar money most would rather drive a less attractive vehicle than be seen in a Hyundai. The same outlook holds true for any American car that embark on territory traditionally dominated by the Europeans. We all know the historical reasons why so I will leave it at that.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 160
2006 E55
Stock for stock, the supercharged CTS-V is slightly faster than an E55. They are CONSISTENT high 11s/low 12s @117-118 cars. Of course, a novice driver is an exception, but the the CTS-V SHOULD be faster every time on stock cars. I am leaving factory freaks etc. out of the question, but this is the norm.
Anybody who argues otherwise is an AMG brand ***** or has never driven a V, or both.
Anybody who argues otherwise is an AMG brand ***** or has never driven a V, or both.
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 29
From: Orlando
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
Sure, both old and new!
Classics with da poosey magnet install -
Including but certainly not limited to:
67-69 Camaro
67-68 Fastback Mustang ( almost all 64-70 mustangs actually)
70 Chevelle
Almost any convertible from 62-72
07+ GT500 (most newer Mustang GTs again)
06+ Z06
Most full size american diesel crew cab trucks
Most full size American gas crew cab 4x4 trucks
Classics with da poosey magnet install -
Including but certainly not limited to:
67-69 Camaro
67-68 Fastback Mustang ( almost all 64-70 mustangs actually)
70 Chevelle
Almost any convertible from 62-72
07+ GT500 (most newer Mustang GTs again)
06+ Z06
Most full size american diesel crew cab trucks
Most full size American gas crew cab 4x4 trucks
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 438
Likes: 4
From: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Agreed, as evidenced by the panty dropper comments. I'm curious to know if anyone considers any American cars to be panty droppers?
Stock for stock, the supercharged CTS-V is faster than an E55. They are CONSISTENT high 11s @117-118 cars. Of course, a novice driver is an exception, but the the CTS-V SHOULD be faster every time on stock cars.
Anybody who argues otherwise is an AMG brand ***** or has never driven a V, or both.
Anybody who argues otherwise is an AMG brand ***** or has never driven a V, or both.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
Sure, both old and new!
Classics with da poosey magnet install -
Including but certainly not limited to:
67-69 Camaro
67-68 Fastback Mustang ( almost all 64-70 mustangs actually)
70 Chevelle
Almost any convertible from 62-72
07+ GT500 (most newer Mustang GTs again)
06+ Z06
Most full size american diesel crew cab trucks
Most full size American gas crew cab 4x4 trucks
Classics with da poosey magnet install -
Including but certainly not limited to:
67-69 Camaro
67-68 Fastback Mustang ( almost all 64-70 mustangs actually)
70 Chevelle
Almost any convertible from 62-72
07+ GT500 (most newer Mustang GTs again)
06+ Z06
Most full size american diesel crew cab trucks
Most full size American gas crew cab 4x4 trucks
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 438
Likes: 4
From: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
id love to run one
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 29
From: Orlando
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
I strongly strongly disagree . I've built countless pro-touring musclecars for both myself and others, and just about everytime I take one out, somebody drops a comment or comes to take a look. It's not so much the status of the car, most of them have no idea that they cost as much as a Gallardo or 430 Ferrari , it's just that everybody likes a clean classic and would like to go for a ride!
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 29
From: Orlando
1967 Pro Touring turbo LSX Camaro
That's the funniest thing I've seen all day
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 438
Likes: 4
From: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
lmao GM- Government motors
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 2
From: L.I. NY
2011 CTSV auto, 06 E55 white pano, 87 Grand national, 63 split window
I strongly strongly disagree . I've built countless pro-touring musclecars for both myself and others, and just about everytime I take one out, somebody drops a comment or comes to take a look. It's not so much the status of the car, most of them have no idea that they cost as much as a Gallardo or 430 Ferrari , it's just that everybody likes a clean classic and would like to go for a ride!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 27
From: A to the Z (the state)
'06 E55
The next gen (V3) CTS has my attention. I am anxiously awaiting the CTS-V version, but for now, here's a badass rendering and some actual shots of the "regular V3 CTS:
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 61
From: Cypress, TX
'06 E55, '15 Jeep SRT8, '94 Mustang GT
I strongly strongly disagree . I've built countless pro-touring musclecars for both myself and others, and just about everytime I take one out, somebody drops a comment or comes to take a look. It's not so much the status of the car, most of them have no idea that they cost as much as a Gallardo or 430 Ferrari , it's just that everybody likes a clean classic and would like to go for a ride!
I've just never seen a chick, who has the mindset at dropping her panties upon seeing a car they are impressed with, get excited over an old car. I imagine that the girls who drop toe floss over the sight of a car care about one thing....image, or rather brand recognition.
