M113K & M113N/A crankshaft....
The following users liked this post:
jamesge (09-01-2020)
10-30-2013, 10:14 AM
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orbiting the planet
Posts: 4,478
Received 1,488 Likes
on
986 Posts
This place is a joke.
Haha...that is also correct...but in the U.S. we would call this a "stroker" engine, referring to the piston stroke.
In this case it means the piston will travel further up and down, meaning the "stroke" of the piston has been changed..what this does is increase the displacement (more cc's or cu. In) without changing the bore diameter (the diameter of the pistons). This is done using a crankshaft with the rod journals further away from the centerline of the crankshaft.
Now, thinking about it, not sure if the OP was referring to the base 113 engine, or the N/A AMG 113 (as in the 210 chassis E55) vs the S/C AMG 113 in our 211 chassis. I'd have to look up the specs on that.
In this case it means the piston will travel further up and down, meaning the "stroke" of the piston has been changed..what this does is increase the displacement (more cc's or cu. In) without changing the bore diameter (the diameter of the pistons). This is done using a crankshaft with the rod journals further away from the centerline of the crankshaft.
Now, thinking about it, not sure if the OP was referring to the base 113 engine, or the N/A AMG 113 (as in the 210 chassis E55) vs the S/C AMG 113 in our 211 chassis. I'd have to look up the specs on that.
10-30-2013, 10:24 AM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A.D., U.A.E
Posts: 7,031
Likes: 0
Received 383 Likes
on
348 Posts
00 C200 & 00 C55 & 06 SLK55
Thankss for info.,
Is there a special treatment or something with M113K crankshaft & con. rod & piston, than M113 N/A...?, if so,
that could help to unleash some power to M113 N/A....!!
ZAYED,,
Is there a special treatment or something with M113K crankshaft & con. rod & piston, than M113 N/A...?, if so,
that could help to unleash some power to M113 N/A....!!
ZAYED,,
10-30-2013, 10:58 AM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A.D., U.A.E
Posts: 7,031
Likes: 0
Received 383 Likes
on
348 Posts
00 C200 & 00 C55 & 06 SLK55
WaaaW, i didn't know M113K crank is lighter than M113 N/A, is that the same with con.rods & bearings & pistons....??
ZAYED,,
ZAYED,,
Trending Topics
10-30-2013, 11:25 AM
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
32 Posts
96 and 08 911 turbos
10-30-2013, 11:43 AM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A.D., U.A.E
Posts: 7,031
Likes: 0
Received 383 Likes
on
348 Posts
00 C200 & 00 C55 & 06 SLK55
Very good info.,
they mention the comparison between M119 & M113,
need a spec. comparison between M113K & M113 N/A....
ZAYED,,
they mention the comparison between M119 & M113,
need a spec. comparison between M113K & M113 N/A....
ZAYED,,
11-09-2013, 09:30 AM
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A.D., U.A.E
Posts: 7,031
Likes: 0
Received 383 Likes
on
348 Posts
00 C200 & 00 C55 & 06 SLK55
Just curious,,
how many HP drops, if removing S/C and putting N/A intake....?
is the S/C gives more than 80hp....??
ZAYED,,
how many HP drops, if removing S/C and putting N/A intake....?
is the S/C gives more than 80hp....??
ZAYED,,
11-09-2013, 12:20 PM
#11
Regardless if the NA version is lighter or not, if you use it in a supercharged application you have to have it weight balanced to match the weight of whatever pistons and rods you're using , so it's not really a benefit. It'll cost more to balance as a matter of fact if weight has to be added.
